Free electricity with and without the use of magnets.

By making sure we do not have access to these operational free energy devices/resources. That most of these suppressed, neglected and misunderstood FREE energy principles have all been cleaner, cheaper and most importantly, in most cases have had the capacity to decentralize the energy grid and produce a self-contained home power system.

Tesla explained it all and paid with his life for it.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is energy-frequencies-and-fibration.jpg

Because science is knowledge, and knowledge is power, those who desire power tend to have research divisions heavily involved in secret science – the more they know, the farther up the causality chain they can act, and thus the more effects they can control.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is DNA_activation.jpg

Unfortunately, the majority of those who attempt to bring liberating technology into mainstream use and thus could upset the power monopoly are killed.

There are advanced civilizations out there hundreds of million years old and thriving and no one of them is using or in need of coal, oil or gas. Letting us have the secret disk technology able to travel without burning fuel.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is ufos-navy-2.jpg
Behind it is demonic com-plot to limit our knowledge and understanding, possibility to travel and move including able to leave the earth. Because earth is a prison run by Luna-crates and butchers.
Looking in hindsight what is always easy and the explanations as provided here are harmful acts on behave of governments and commercial actors.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is ufo-navy-2.jpg
It contradicts there actions and behaviour as being in to protect and advance humanity but self-centered interest.
Nothing of what is happening is by accident, nothing looks like it seems and everything as such is connected. Producing crab, distract, cheat and steal.
The earth belongs to there inhabitants not a small group in power nor the so-called elite. ( Cabal & deep state)
What we call did call nothing in the past is on the cosmological scale, virtually everything. It is the home of all the invisible fields, rippling with the activity of every real force. Every kind of matter produces a field, the field all mesh in complex ways, often causing interference with other fields. Fields are the “stuff” of the virtual vacuum. When everything that can be removed from a vacuum has been removed, the Higgs field remains.
Basically; other than from interaction with matter of other fields a field will not be changed in the vacuum. It will not go away; it simply cannot. Fields are a fundamental part of the vacuum structure itself.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is disk-lady.jpg
 The field consists of an infinite number of one-dimensional North and South poles in an incoherent state- incoherent due to the presence of a multitude of other interfering fields formed by other North and South poles, or particles or quanta. Thus the virtual vacuum is far from empty, far from nothing, it is rather seething with potential energy as the primordial powerhouse of everything in the universe.

The climate debate:

The need for convenient, economical and powerful sources of renewable energy remains urgent.
When the magnetic fields within a generator are caused to move and interact by means other than applied mechanical force, electric power can be supplied without the necessity of consuming limited natural resources, thus with far greater economy.

Summary of the Invention It has long been known that the source of the magnetism within a permanent magnet is a spinning electric current within ferromagnetic atoms of certain elements, persisting indefinitely in accord with well-defined quantum rules.


This atomic current encircles every atom, thereby causing each atom to emit a magnetic field, as a miniature electromagnet. This atomic current does not exist in magnets alone. It also exists in ordinary metallic iron, and in any element or metallic alloy which can be “magnetized”, that is, any material which exhibits ferromagnetism.

All ferromagnetic atoms and “magnetic metals” contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.
In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible.
The orientation of magnetic flux both internal and external to the material, pivots easily.
Such materials are referred to as magnetically “soft”, due to this magnetic flexibility.

Permanent magnet materials are magnetically “hard”. The orientation axis of each is fixed in place within a rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move.
This constraint aligns the field of ordinary magnets permanently, hence the name “permanent”.

The axis of circular current flow in one ferromagnetic atom can direct the axis of magnetism within another ferromagnetic atom, through a process known as “spin exchange”. This gives a soft magnetic material, like raw iron, the useful ability to aim, focus and redirect the magnetic field emitted from a magnetically hard permanent magnet. In the present invention, a permanent magnet’s rigid field is sent into a magnetically flexible “soft” magnetic material. the permanent magnet’s apparent location, observed from points within the magnetically soft material, will effectively move, vibrate, and appear to shift position when the magnetisation of the soft magnetic material is modulated by ancillary means (much like the sun, viewed while underwater, appears to move when the water is agitated).

By this mechanism, the motion required for generation of electricity can be synthesized within a soft magnetic material, without requiring physical movement or an applied mechanical force.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is teslapyramide.jpg

Background This invention relates to a method and device for generating electrical power using solid state means.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Tesla-patent-1901-300x206.jpg
Tesla

It has long been known that moving a magnetic field across a wire will generate an electromotive force (EMF), or voltage, along the wire. When this wire is connected in a closed electrical circuit, an electric current, capable of performing work, is driven through this closed circuit by the induced electromotive force.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is tesla_radiant-energy-1024x302.jpg

Permanent magnet materials are magnetically “hard”. The orientation axis of each is fixed in place within a rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move.
This constraint aligns the field of ordinary magnets permanently, hence the name “permanent”.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Pyramide_and_electrictry.jpg

The magnets may be formed of any polarised magnetic material. In order of descending effectiveness, the most desirable permanent magnet materials are Neodymium-Iron-Boron (“NIB”), Samarium Cobalt, AlNiCo alloy, or “ceramic” Strontium-Barium or Lead-Ferrite.

Magnetic flux adds together in these zones, where induced magnetic flux (c) aids the input flux (a).
This is the reverse of typical generator action, where induced flux (c) is typically opposing the “input” flux originating the induction. Since the magnetic interaction is a combination of magnetic flux opposition and magnetic flux acceleration, there is no longer an overall magnetic braking or total opposition effect. The braking and opposition is counterbalanced by a simultaneous magnetic acceleration within the core. Since mechanical motion is absent, the equivalent electrical effect ranges
from idling, or absence of opposition, to a strengthening and overall acceleration of the electrical input signal (within coils 6).

It has also long been known that this resulting electric current causes the closed circuit to become encircled with a secondary, induced magnetic field, whose polarity opposes the primary magnetic field which first induced the EMF. this magnetic opposition creates mutual repulsion as a moving magnet approaches such a closed circuit, and a mutual attraction as that moving magnet moves away from the closed circuit. Both these actions tend to slow or cause “drag” on the progress of the moving magnet, causing the electric generator to act as a magnetic brake, whose effect is in direct proportion to the amount of electric current produced.

Key to understanding:

All ferromagnetic atoms and “magnetic metals” contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.
In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible.


The orientation of magnetic flux both internal and external to the material, pivots easily.
Such materials are referred to as magnetically “soft”, due to this magnetic flexibility.

The axis of circular current flow in one ferromagnetic atom can direct the axis of magnetism within another ferromagnetic atom, through a process known as “spin exchange”. This gives a soft magnetic material, like raw iron, the useful ability to aim, focus and redirect the magnetic field emitted from a magnetically hard permanent magnet. In the present invention, a permanent magnet’s rigid field is sent into a magnetically flexible “soft” magnetic material. the permanent magnet’s apparent location, observed from points within the magnetically soft material, will effectively move, vibrate, and appear to shift position when the magnetisation of the soft magnetic material is modulated by ancillary means (much like the sun, viewed while underwater, appears to move when the water is agitated). By this mechanism, the motion required for generation of electricity can be synthesised within a soft magnetic material, without requiring physical movement or an applied mechanical force.

The synthesised magnetic motion is produced without either mechanical or electrical resistance.
This synthesised magnetic motion is aided by forces generated in accordance with Lenz’s Law, in order to produce acceleration of the synthesised magnetic motion, instead of physical “magnetic braking” common to mechanically-actuated electrical generators.

A primary factor determining permanent magnet material composition is the magnetic flux strength of the particular material type. In an embodiment of the invention, these magnets may also be substituted with one or more electromagnets producing the required magnetic flux. In another embodiment of the invention, a superimposed DC current bias can be applied to the output wire to generate the required magnetic flux, replacing or augmenting the permanent magnets.

This core is a critical component of the generator.
The core determines the output power capacity, the optimum magnet type, the electrical impedance and the operating frequency range. the core may be any shape, composed of any ferromagnetic material, formed by any process (sintering, casting, adhesive bonding, tape-winding, etc.)

The existence of negative energy/effects.

Scientific American, January 2000
from TerryBoyce Website
recovered through WayBackMachine Website
Spanish version
The construction of worm holes and warp drive would require a very unusual form of energy.
Unfortunately, the same laws of physics that allow the existence of this “negative energy” also appear to limit its behavior

If a wormhole could exist, it would appear as a spherical opening to an otherwise distant part of the cosmos. In this doctored photograph of Times Square, the wormhole allows New Yorkers to walk to the Sahara with a single step, rather than spending hours on the plane to Tamanrasset. although such a wormhole does not break any known laws of physics, it would require the production of unrealistic amounts of negative energy.
Can a region of space contain less than nothing?
Common sense would say no; the most one could do is remove all matter and radiation and be left with vacuum. But quantum physics has a proven ability to confound intuition, and this case is no exception. A region of space, it turns out, can contain less than nothing. Its energy per unit volume – the energy density – can be less than zero.
Needless to say, the implications are bizarre. According to Einstein’s theory of gravity, general relativity, the presence of matter and energy warps the geometric fabric of space and time. What we perceive as gravity is the space-time distortion produced by normal, positive energy or mass.
But when negative energy or mass – so-called exotic matter – bends space-time, all sorts of amazing phenomena might become possible: traversable wormholes, which could act as tunnels to otherwise distant parts of the universe; warp drive, which would allow for faster-than-light travel; and time machines, which might permit journeys into the past.
Negative energy could even be used to make perpetual-motion machines or to destroy black holes. A Star Trek episode could not ask for more.
For physicists, these ramifications set off alarm bells. The potential paradoxes of backward time travel–such as killing your grandfather before your father is conceived–have long been explored in science fiction, and the other consequences of exotic matter are also problematic. They raise a question of fundamental importance: Do the laws of physics that permit negative energy place any limits on its behavior?
We and others have discovered that nature imposes stringent constraints on the magnitude and duration of negative energy, which (unfortunately, some would say) appear to render the construction of wormholes and warp drives very unlikely.
Double Negative
Before proceeding further, we should draw the reader’s attention to what negative energy is not.
It should not be confused with antimatter, which has positive energy. When an electron and its antiparticle, a positron, collide, they annihilate. The end products are gamma rays, which carry positive energy. If antiparticles were composed of negative energy, such an interaction would result in a final energy of zero.
One should also not confuse negative energy with the energy associated with the cosmological constant, postulated in inflationary models of the universe [see ” Cosmological Antigravity,” by Lawrence M. Krauss; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, January 1999]. Such a constant represents negative pressure but positive energy. (Some authors call this exotic matter; we reserve the term for negative energy densities.)
The concept of negative energy is not pure fantasy; some of its effects have even been produced in the laboratory. They arise from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, which requires that the energy density of any electric, magnetic or other field fluctuate randomly. Even when the energy density is zero on average, as in a vacuum, it fluctuates.
Thus, the quantum vacuum can never remain empty in the classical sense of the term; it is a roiling sea of “virtual” particles spontaneously popping in and out of existence [see “Exploiting Zero-Point Energy,” by Philip Yam; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1997]. In quantum theory, the usual notion of zero energy corresponds to the vacuum with all these fluctuations.
So if one can somehow contrive to dampen the undulations, the vacuum will have less energy than it normally does–that is, less than zero energy.

Waves of light ordinarily have a positive or zero energy density at different points in space (top). But in a so-called squeezed state, the energy density at a particular instant in time can become negative at some locations (bottom). To compensate, the peak positive density must increase.


As an example, researchers in quantum optics have created special states of fields in which destructive quantum interference suppresses the vacuum fluctuations. These so-called squeezed vacuum states involve negative energy. More precisely, they are associated with regions of alternating positive and negative energy.
The total energy averaged over all space remains positive; squeezing the vacuum creates negative energy in one place at the price of extra positive energy elsewhere. A typical experiment involves laser beams passing through nonlinear optical materials [see “Squeezed Light,” by Richart E. Slusher and Bernard Yurke; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, May 1988]. The intense laser light induces the material to create pairs of light quanta, photons. These photons alternately enhance and suppress the vacuum fluctuations, leading to regions of positive and negative energy, respectively.
Another method for producing negative energy introduces geometric boundaries into a space. In 1948 Dutch physicist Hendrik B. G. Casimir showed that two uncharged parallel metal plates alter the vacuum fluctuations in such a way as to attract each other. The energy density between the plates was later calculated to be negative. In effect, the plates reduce the fluctuations in the gap between them; this creates negative energy and pressure, which pulls the plates together.
The narrower the gap, the more negative the energy and pressure, and the stronger is the attractive force.
The Casimir effect has recently been measured by Steve K. Lamoreaux of Los Alamos National Laboratory and by Umar Mohideen of the University of California at Riverside and his colleague Anushree Roy. Similarly, in the 1970s Paul C. W. Davies and Stephen A. Fulling, then at King’s College at the University of London, predicted that a moving boundary, such as a moving mirror, could produce a flux of negative energy.
For both the Casimir effect and squeezed states, researchers have measured only the indirect effects of negative energy.
Direct detection is more difficult but might be possible using atomic spins, as Peter G. Grove, then at the British Home Office, Adrian C. Ottewill, then at the University of Oxford, and one of us (Ford) suggested in 1992.
Gravity and Levity
The concept of negative energy arises in several areas of modern physics.
It has an intimate link with black holes, those mysterious objects whose gravitational field is so strong that nothing can escape from within their boundary, the event horizon.
In 1974 Stephen W. Hawking of the University of Cambridge made his famous prediction that black holes evaporate by emitting radiation [see “The Quantum Mechanics of Black Holes,” by Stephen W. Hawking; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, January 1977].
A black hole radiates energy at a rate inversely proportional to the square of its mass. Although the evaporation rate is large only for subatomic size black holes, it provides a crucial link between the laws of black holes and the laws of thermodynamics. The Hawking radiation allows black holes to come into thermal equilibrium with their environment.
At first glance, evaporation leads to a contradiction. The horizon is a one-way street; energy can only flow inward. So how can a black hole radiate energy outward? Because energy must be conserved, the production of positive energy – which distant observers see as the Hawking radiation – is accompanied by a flow of negative energy into the hole. Here the negative energy is produced by the extreme space-time curvature near the hole, which disturbs the vacuum fluctuations. In this way, negative energy is required for the consistency of the unification of black hole physics with thermodynamics.
The black hole is not the only curved region of space-time where negative energy seems to play a role. Another is the worm hole – a hypothesized type of tunnel that connects one region of space and time to another. Physicists used to think that wormholes exist only on the very finest length scales, bubbling in and out of existence like virtual particles [see “Quantum Gravity, by Bryce S. DeWitt; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1983]. In the early 1960s physicists Robert Fuller and John A. Wheeler showed that larger wormholes would collapse under their own gravity so rapidly that even a beam of light would not have enough time to travel through them.
But in the late 1980s various researchers – notably Michael S. Morris and Kip S. Thorne of the California Institute of Technology and Matt Visser of Washington University – found otherwise.
Certain wormholes could in fact be made large enough for a person or spaceship. Someone might enter the mouth of a wormhole stationed on Earth, walk a short distance inside the wormhole and exit the other mouth in, say, the Andromeda galaxy. The catch is that traversable wormholes require negative energy. Because negative energy is gravitationally repulsive, it would prevent the wormhole from collapsing.
For a wormhole to be traversable, it ought to (at bare minimum) allow signals, in the form of light rays, to pass through it. Light rays entering one mouth of a wormhole are converging, but to emerge from the other mouth, they must defocus – in other words, they must go from converging to diverging somewhere in between [see illustration below]. This defocusing requires negative energy.
Whereas the curvature of space produced by the attractive gravitational field of ordinary matter acts like a converging lens, negative energy acts like a diverging lens.

Climate change which is real but carbon dioxide in itself is, was nor will be a climates changer, just a big lie. To be able to charge everybody. Carbon dioxide is the raw material for the carbon-hydrates. Simple.

Kan een cartoon zijn

A wide range of shapes, materials
and processes is known in the art of making magnetic cores. Effective common materials include amorphous metal alloys (such as sold under the “Metglas” trademark by Metglas Inc., Conway, S.C.), nanocrystalline alloys, manganese and zinc ferrites as well as ferrites of any suitable element including any combination of magnetically “hard” and “soft” ferrites, powdered metals and ferromagnetic alloys, laminations of cobalt and/or iron and silicon-iron “electrical steel”.

The Phi-Transformer. Toroidal shapes are clearly important in many devices which pull in additional energy from the environment, even to the extent that Bob Boyce warns against the high-frequency sequential pulsing of coils wound on a toroid yoke, producing a rotating magnetic field as unpredictable surge events can generate some 10,000 amps of additional current which will burn out the circuit components and can very well trigger a radiant energy build up which can create a lightning strike. It is electrical in nature. In actual fact, magnetism and electricity are not two separate things,
but instead, they are different aspects of the same thing, so both should really be referred to as
“electromagnetism”. The wave has two components on the vertical part being the electric charge and magnetic forces moving the charge. You do need soft magnets. Most known and in use for a long time is the Hans Coler device patented well before the WW2 in Germany. Almost all underground installations and Alien/human research installation’s /town run by the Deep State/cabal. Same people who are in Davos pushing the fake carbon dioxide show including Dulce. Only the West/EU paying and the rest exempted even getting paid. Cost of so-called green energy is threefold of that of coal, killing our industry. Compensated by the EU and government by creating money out of nothing. India and China alone have been building between three and for big new coal burning electric powerplants a week.

Stupid, Stupid, Stupid.

The magnetic flux from a permanent magnet consists of two components.
One component is rotary and it spreads out in every direction.
The second component is linear and it gets swamped and hidden by the rotary field.

It is important that the voltage applied to the energising coil in this ‘conditioning’ process be a perfect
sinewave. Shock, or outside influence can destroy the ‘conditioning’ but it can be reinstated by repeating
the conditioning process. It should be noted that the conditioning process may not be successful at the
first attempt but repeating the process on the same magnet is usually successful. Once conditioning is completed, the capacitors are no longer needed. The device then only needs a few milliwatts of 60 Hz applied to the input coil to give up to 1.5 kW at 60 Hz at the output coil. The output coil can then supply the input coil indefinitely. The conditioning process modifies the magnetisation of the ferrite slab. Before the process the North pole is on one face of the magnet and the South pole on the opposite face. After conditioning, the South pole does not stop at the mid point but extends to the outer edges of the North pole face, extending inwards from the edge by about 6 mm. Also, there is a magnetic ‘bubble’ created in the middle of the North pole face and the position of this ‘bubble’ moves when another magnet is brought near it. The conditioned slab has three coil windings:

EARTH’S NUCLEUS AND ROLE OF THE PYRAMIDS
IN CONTROL OF ITS PROCESSES.


Application of two inventions of the author: method of geoholography and method of geohydrodiagnostics enabled to conduct Earth’s nucleus research. The research has been affected by means of microwave range frequency scanning and showed discrepancy between the existing understandings of the Earth’s nucleus structure with real one. Current opinion that the Earth’s nucleus consists of iron and nickel is based upon seismic observation data, without taking into consideration thermophysical characteristics of mentioned metals. Actually, iron and nickel are characterized by high thermo-conductivity and relatively low thermal heat capacity. That’s why both the Earth itself and its nucleus should have got cold for a thousand years’ period only. Then, what is the source of the volcanoes, geothermal waters and hot oil?
 The research, conducted by means of quantum generator for scanning the Earth’s nucleus as well as special test attachments, enabled to determine its real diameter and composition with great precision. The Earth’s nucleus consists of 7 shells, varying in thickness and composition. The nucleus radius is equal to 2340+30 Km. The thickness of the outer layer is about 430 Km. It is on alloy of sand and clay with insertions of graphite, diamonds, ruby and other crystals. The next shell is about 220 Km. and is composed of a various liquid metals’ conglomerate: lead, platinum, gold, silver, copper, nickel, tin, etc. The thickness of the next shell is about 90 Km. and is composed of liquid lead. The next shell is approximately 360 Km. long and is composed of uranium. The next shell is about 70 Km. long, is composed of graphite, serves as delay mechanism and reflector of neutrons. Under this shell we can found 90 Km. layers of inert gases. It is the zone of convective thermo exchange in the gas area of the nucleus. The central part of the nucleus is composed of the of light gas elements, which participate in the reaction of thermonuclear fusion as well as its products (hydrogen, deuterium, tritium, helium, nitrogen, carbonic acid, lithium, methane, oxygen, etc.). The thickness of this shell is about 720 Km by radius. Thus, it has for the first time been found, that the reactions of nuclear fusion are being happened in the earth’s nucleus. These processes are of the same nature with those, being happened inside the sun. Following the exhaust of the matter, which participates in the reactions, a gradual decrease of temperature should have been occurred. However, owing to the circumstances, beyond our understanding, things are going another way. Since, the volcanic activity increases from time to time, we have a sound reason to believe that alongside with nuclear fusion reactions, the processes of uranium accumulation and fusion are being underway. However, influences of other factors are admittable. Thus, for example, comparing an explosive nature of solar reactions with rather calm processes inside the Earth’s nucleus, it seems reasonable to believe that certain energies could exist. These hypothetic energies might control and restrain nuclear fusion and decay as well as additionally heat metallic nucleus shells. Having analyzed energy exchange in the Great Pyramids of Egypt as well as Seven Sevastopol Pyramids, which have been found by us, the author came to the following conclusions:    – the high frequency cosmic energy comes to the tops of the whole group of the Pyramids through 3 channels, varying in frequency. Inside the Pyramid this energy is converting into low-frequency one, and is summarizing and penetrates by a focused beam down to graphite nucleus’ shell. Simultaneously, by means of inductive influence of this energy, metal-composed shells are additionally heated. Energy distribution analysis taken by a separately chosen Pyramid, located in different parts of the planet, revealed an unexpected result: certain group of Pyramids serves only as a receiver of Cosmic energy, another group – only as a transmitter using diamond layer as big quantity of lasers. This proved to be very high frequency energy. However, a certain part of this energy is converting into low-frequency one is radiate into open Space. The model of the interaction of the Pyramids and Earth’s nucleus is presented at pic. 1.

Willing to find the source of the cosmic energy, the author composed the holograms of the sky and synchronized them with the holograms of the parts of the Earth, containing Pyramids (Egypt, Himalayas, England, Mexico, Sevastopol, Easter Island and Bermuda Islands).Having hologrammically tracked the energy flows, the author revealed that Himalayas and Bermuda Pyramids provide energy exchange of the Earth’s nucleus with Alpha Aureus (Capella); Mexican and English (Stonehenge) – with Alpha Lyra (Vega); Egyptian, Sevastopol and Easter  Island – with Alpha Cule (Canopus).Each Star of Northern Celestial Hemisphere controls two groups of Pyramids. One group serves as a receiver, whereas another as a transmitter to the Star. The Stars are located under the 120″ angle in relation to each other, thus, creating electromagnetic momentums, effecting the position of the Earth’s axis, and, probably, its rotation. However, in accordance with the laws of celestial mechanics, one more group of Pyramids should have been existed, in order to get the equality of momentums of the Northern and Southern Earth Hemispheres. According to the mathematical calculation, this group of Pyramids must have been existed in the center of South America. These missing Pyramids have been found in Brasilia. The whole scheme of energy exchange with stars is shown at Pic.2.

In view of the above-mentioned, the following conclusions could be deducted:    – The Pyramids play an important role in control of the Earth’s nucleus, position of the Earth’s axis and the rotation of the Globe. That is why it seems intuitively clear, that is very significant to preserve the entirety of the Pyramids’ structure. The decreased vertical energy exchange Pyramids should be specially treated by the cosmic energy for the sake of vertical conductivity restoration. This work could be performed New Age Masters Restoration of the Pyramids’ direct function could contribute the prolongation of the current civilization and to ease the Transitive collapses.

The author,
assistant technical sciences, professor Vitaly A. Gokh. academician

Back to: A Practical Guide to ‘Free Energy’ Devices
Devices Part 5: Last updated: 10th December 2007
Author: Patrick J. Kelly

  1. Energy can be taken from “permanent” magnets Johnson, Camus, Bedini, Ecklin, Coler, Sweet, Bearden, Davidson, Gunderson, Flynn, etc. Nelson Camus. Nelson Camus built a motor using only permanent magnets as the power source. He stated that it was difficult to adjust the magnets to the correct positions but that when he did, the motor ran uninterrupted for six months. An output power of 300 Watts has been produced.

Nelson Camus.

With ferrite magnets some 600 rpm has been achieved and with NIB magnets 3000 rpm. As far as I am aware, nobody else has built a working copy. He states that the moveable aluminum sheets are essential to the operation in addition to acting as a start/stop mechanism.
Here is a sketch of the arrangement: There are two, non-magnetic rotors on the central shaft, one near each end of the shaft. These are adjustable from 85 to 89 degrees to each other, i.e., nearly at right angles to each other but not quite.
The thick aluminum plates modify the magnetic field and so are essential for operation of the motor.
The pairs of aluminum plates at each end of the cylinder are adjustable separately. The stator magnets
are adjustable in height and lateral position and this is done to tune the motor once it has started running.

It appears that much skill and perseverance are needed to get this motor operational, but once it has been adjusted, it runs indefinitely.

Details can be seen on the http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/trmdiag.htm web site.

John Bedini has produced a very simple motor design which uses only permanent magnets: Here, the magnetic field of the stator magnet is altered by the iron yoke. This gives the rotor magnets a push as
they pass by, and dampens the opposing thrust which would normally inhibit the rotation.

John W. Ecklin was granted US Patent Number 3,879,622 on 29th March 1974. The patent is for a magnet/electric motor generator which produces an output greater than the input necessary to run it. There are two styles of operation.


The main illustration for the first is:
Here, the (clever) idea is to use a small low-power motor to rotate a magnetic shield to mask the pull of two magnets. This causes a fluctuating magnet field which is used to rotate a generator drive.
In the diagram above, the motor at point ‘A’ rotates the shaft and shielding strips at point ‘B”.

These rectangular mu-metal strips form a very conductive path for the magnetic lines of force when they are lined up with the ends of the magnets and they effectively shut off the magnet pull in the area of point ‘C’. At point ‘C’, the spring-loaded traveler is pulled to the left when the right-hand magnet is shielded and the left hand magnet is not shielded. When the motor shaft rotates further, the traveler is pulled to the right when the left-hand magnet is shielded and the right hand magnet is not shielded. This oscillation is passed by mechanical linkage to point ‘D’ where it is used to rotate a shaft used to power a generator. As the effort needed to rotate the magnetic shield is relatively low, it is claimed that the output exceeds the input and so can be used to power the motor which rotates the magnetic shield.

The second method for exploiting the idea is shown in the patent as: Here, the same shielding idea is utilized to produce a reciprocating movement which is then converted to two rotary motions to drive two generators. The pair of magnets ‘A’ are placed in a housing and pressed towards each other by two springs. When the springs are fully extended, they are just clear of the magnetic shield ‘B’
When a small electric motor (not shown in the diagram) moves the magnetic shield out of the way, the two


magnets are strongly repelled from each other as their North poles are close together. This compresses the springs and through the linkages at ‘C’ they turn two shafts to generate output power.

A modification of this idea is the Brown-Ecklin Generator. In this arrangement, the movable magnetic
shielding arrangement provides a direct electrical output rather than a mechanical movement:
Here, the same motor and rotating magnetic shield arrangement is used, but the magnetic lines of force are blocked from flowing through a central I-piece.

This I-piece is made of laminated iron slivers and has a pickup coil or coils wound around it.
The device operates as follows: In the position shown on the left, the magnetic lines of force flow
downwards through the pickup coils. When the motor shaft has rotated a further ninety degrees, the
situation on the right occurs and there, the magnetic lines of force flow upwards through the pickup coils.

This is shown by the blue arrows in the diagram. This reversal of magnetic flux takes place four times for
every rotation of the motor shaft.

Invention Intelligence (India). The following design for a permanent magnet motor was published in the
April 1977 issue of ‘Invention Intelligence’ in India: This design relies on the magnetic field of a
magnet being distorted by having the pole faces angled at 45 degrees. In the diagram, the magnets are shown in blue and they are mounted in a non-magnetic stator and rotor material shown in grey. The rotor is mounted on two ball races shown in yellow.

The theory is that the repulsing forces of the four North-North outer magnet pairs along with the repulsing forces of the four inner South-South magnet pairs should be continuously greater than the
North-South attracting forces, thus giving continuous rotation.
It appears most likely that this design is just a theory and that a working model has never been constructed.
However, it is possible that this system might work very well, so the information is presented here for
interest and possible experimentation.
It might be remarked that making the magnet face have a 45 degree angle may well not skew the magnetic field sufficiently to give a big enough imbalance to provide significant drive power. One way to increase the effect might be to use a mu-metal strip along the back of each magnet. Mu-metal is an expensive material which conducts magnetic lines of force in a phenomenal way and so soaks up any magnetism near it.:

Hans Coler.

German naval captain Hans Coler invented an over-unity generator in 1925.
He called this device the ‘Stromerzeuger’ and for a few watts from a dry battery it provided 6 KW continuously.


He was refused development support because it was “a perpetual motion machine”.

Hans also invented a passive device which he called the ‘Magnetstromapparat’. His unit required very careful and slow adjustment to get it operating but when it started it continued on test in a locked room for three months of continuous operation.
Nobody, including Hans, seems any too sure how this device works but it is presented here in case you wish to research it further.

It comprises six bar magnets wound as shown here. Some are wound in a clockwise direction when looking at the North pole and these are called “Right” those wound in an anticlockwise direction are called “Left”: These six magnets are arranged in a hexagon and wired as shown here:

And the schematic diagram is:One extremely interesting feature of this passive device is that it has been
witnessed producing 450 mV for several hours; it was capable of developing up to 12 Volts.
The witnesses were quite sure that it was not picking up radio or mains input. So, what was it picking up?
To operate the device, the switch is left in the open position, the magnets are moved slightly apart and the sliding coil set into various positions with a wait of several minutes between adjustments. The magnets are then separated still further and the coils moved again. This process is repeated until at a critical separation of the magnets, a voltage is developed. The switch is now closed and the process continued more slowly. The voltage then builds up to a maximum which is then maintained indefinitely. The position of the apparatus in the room and the orientation of the device had no effect on the output. The magnets were selected to be as nearly equal in strength as possible and the resistance of the magnet and coil were checked after winding to make sure they were as nearly equal as possible (about 0.33 ohms).

The “Stromerzeuger” consisted of an arrangement of magnets, flat coils and copper plates with a primary
circuit powered by a small battery. The output from the secondary circuit was used to light a bank of lamps and it was claimed that the output power was many times the input power and to continue indefinitely.


The apparatus principally consists of two parallel connected spools which being bi-filarly wound in a
special way, are magnetically linked together. One of these spools is composed of copper sheets
(the spool is called the ‘plate spool’). The other one is made of a number of thin parallel connected
isolated wires (called ‘spool winding’), running parallel to the plates, at small intervals.
Both spools can be fed by separate batteries (6 Volt, 6.5 AHr were used). At least two batteries are
needed to get the apparatus operating, but subsequently, one battery can be removed. The spools are
arranged in two halves each by the bi-filar windings. The plate spool also contains iron rods with
silver wire connections. These rods are magnetised by a special battery through exciter
windings. Electrically, the exciter winding is completely isolated from the other windings.
Hans said that the production of energy takes place principally in these iron rods and the winding
of the spools plays an essential part in the process. It should be mentioned that the spool circuit
is powered up first. Initially, it took a current of 104 mA. The plates and exciter circuits are
then switched on simultaneously. When this is done, the current in the spool circuit dropped from 104 mA to about 27 mA. It is suggested that an electron be not only regarded as a negatively charged particle but also as a South magnetic pole.


The basic Stromerzeuger element is that of an open secondary circuit, capacity
loaded, inductively coupled to a primary circuit. The novel feature is that the capacities are connected
to the secondary core through permanent magnets as shown here: It is claimed that on switching on the
primary circuit, “separation of charges” takes place with M1 becoming positively charged and M2 becoming negatively charged and that these charges are “magnetically polarised” when they formed, owing to the presence of the magnets. When the primary circuit is switched off, a “reversing current” flows in the secondary but the magnets “do not exert a polarising effect on this reversal”. Two of the basic elements shown above are placed together making a double stage arrangement with the copper plates close together (presumably as capacitor plates) :The secondary windings are both exactly equal and wound in a direction such that, on switching the primary coil on, the electrons in the secondary coil flow from P1 to P2 and from F1 to F2. This is the basic working arrangement. More of these double stages can be added to provide higher outputs.

6Floyd Sweet.

Another device in the same category of permanent magnets with energised coils round it
(and very limited practical information available) was produced by Floyd Sweet. The device was dubbed
“Vacuum Triode Amplifier” or “VTA” by Tom Bearden and the name has stuck, although it does not appear to be a particularly accurate description. The device was capable of producing more than 1 kW of output power at 120 Volts, 60 Hz and is self-powered. The output is energy which resembles electricity in that it powers motors, lamps, etc. but as the power increases through any load there is a temperature drop instead of the expected temperature rise. When it became known that he had produced the device he became the target of serious threats, some of which were delivered face-to-face in broad daylight. It is quite possible that the concern was due to the device tapping zero-point energy, which when done at high currents opens a whole new can of worms.

One of the observed characteristics of the device was that when the current was increased,
the measured weight of the apparatus reduced by about a pound. While this is hardly new, it suggests that space/time was being warped. The German scientists at the end of WWII had been experimenting with this (and killing off the unfortunate people who were used to test the system) – if you have considerable perseverance, you can read up on this in Nick Cook’s inexpensive book “The Hunt for Zero-Point” ISBN 0099414988.

Floyd found that the weight of his device reduced in proportion to the amount of energy being produced.
But he found that if the load was increased enough, a point was suddenly reached where a loud sound like a whirlwind was produced, although there was no movement of the air. The sound was heard by his wife Rose who was in another room of their apartment and by others outside the apartment. Floyd did not increase the load further (which is just as well as he would probably have received a fatal dose of radiation if he had) and did not repeat the test. In my opinion, this is a dangerous device and I personally, would not recommend anyone attempting to build one. It should be noted that a highly lethal 20,000 Volts is used to ‘condition’ the magnets and the principles of operation are not understood at this time.

Also, there is insufficient information to hand to provide realistic advice on practical construction details. On one occasion, Floyd accidentally short-circuited the output wires. There was a bright flash and the wires became covered with frost. It was noted that when the output load was over 1 kW, the magnets and coils powering the device became colder, reaching a temperature of 20 degrees Fahrenheit below room temperature. On one occasion, Floyd received a shock from the apparatus with the current flowing between the thumb and the small finger of one hand. The result was an injury akin to frostbite, causing him considerable pain for at least two weeks.

Observed characteristics of the device include: 1.

The output voltage does not change when the output power is increased from 100W to 1 kW.

2. The device needs a continuous load of at least 25W.

3. The output falls in the early hours of the morning but recovers later on without any intervention.

4. A local earthquake can stop the device operating.

5. The device can be started in self-powered mode by briefly applying 9 Volts to the drive coils.

  1. The device can be stopped by momentary interruption of the power to the power coils.Conventional instruments operate normally up to an output of 1 kW but stop working above that output level, with their readings showing zero or some other spurious reading. Information is limited, but it appears that Floyd’s device was comprised of one or two large ferrite permanent magnets (grade 8, size 150 mm x 100 mm x 25 mm) with coils wound in three planes mutually at right angles to each other (i.e. in the x, y and z axes). The magnetisation of the ferrite magnets is modified by suddenly applying 20,000 Volts from a bank of capacitors (510 Joules) or more to plates on each side of it while simultaneously driving a 1 Amp 60 Hz (or 50 Hz) alternating current through the energising coil. The alternating current should be at the frequency required for the output. The voltage pulse to the plates should be applied at the instant when the ‘A’ coil voltage reaches a peak. This needs to be initiated electronically. It is said that the powering of the plates causes the magnetic material to resonate for a period of about fifteen minutes, and that the applied voltage in the energising coil modifies the positioning of the newly formed poles of the magnet so that it will in future, resonate at that frequency and voltage.

It is important that the voltage applied to the energising coil in this ‘conditioning’ process be a perfect
sinewave. Shock, or outside influence can destroy the ‘conditioning’ but it can be reinstated by repeating
the conditioning process. It should be noted that the conditioning process may not be successful at the
first attempt but repeating the process on the same magnet is usually successful. Once conditioning is completed, the capacitors are no longer needed. The device then only needs a few milliwatts of 60 Hz applied to the input coil to give up to 1.5 kW at 60 Hz at the output coil. The output coil can then supply the input coil indefinitely. The conditioning process modifies the magnetisation of the ferrite slab. Before the process the North pole is on one face of the magnet and the South pole on the opposite face. After conditioning, the South pole does not stop at the mid point but extends to the outer edges of the North pole face, extending inwards from the edge by about 6 mm. Also, there is a magnetic ‘bubble’ created in the middle of the North pole face and the position of this ‘bubble’ moves when another magnet is brought near it. The conditioned slab has three coil windings:

  1. The ‘A’ coil is wound first around the outer perimeter, each turn being 150 + 100 + 150 + 100 = 500 mm
    long (plus a small amount caused by the thickness of the coil former material). It has about 600 turns of
    28 AWG (0.3 mm) wire.
  2. The ‘B’ coil is wound across the 100 mm faces, so one turn is about 100 + 25 + 100 + 25 = 250 mm
    (plus a small amount for the former thickness and clearing coil ‘A’).
    It has between 200 and 500 turns of 20 AWG (1 mm) wire.
  3. The ‘C’ coil is wound along the 150 mm face, so one turn is 150 + 25 + 150 + 25 = 350 mm
    (plus the former thickness, plus clearance for coil ‘A’ and coil ‘B’).
    It has between 200 and 500 turns of 20 AWG (1 mm) wire and should match the resistance of coil ‘B’ as
    closely as possible.

Coil ‘A’ is the input coil.
Coil ‘B’ is the output coil.
Coil ‘C’ is used for the conditioning and for the production of gravitational effects.
Much of this information and photographs of the original device can be found on the website:
“http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/Construction%20of%20the%20Floyd%20Sweet’s%20VTA%20by
%20Watson.htm” where a paper by Michael Watson gives much practical information.

For example, he states that an experimental set up which he made, had the ‘A’ coil with a resistance of 70
ohms and an inductance of 63 mH,
the ‘B’ coil, wound with 23 AWG wire with a resistance of 4.95 ohms and an inductance of 1.735 mH, and the

‘C’ coil, also wound with 23 AWG wire, with a resistance of 5.05 ohms and an inductance of 1.78 mH.

In passing, if the gravity thrust aspect of this information interests you, let me mention a television
documentary programme which you may not have seen. In it, Boyd Bushman demonstrated what might just have
been a simplistic gravity thrust device. Boyd is a US weapons designer of 35 years experience.
He designed the prototype for the ‘Stinger’ missile. He moved to Lockheed as a designer.
There he experimented with various things including the model he demonstrated.

It consisted of 250 turns of 30 AWG enamelled wire wound in a circular bundle about 200 mm in diameter.
The winding was circular in cross section and air cored.

The turns were secured by masking tape, some of which was used to tether the ring to a table top.

He then plugged the coil directly in to the 110V 60 Hz mains supply. The ring immediately lifted off
the table. Boyd described the device as dangerous as it becomes very hot in just a few seconds.
He stated that in his opinion, fed with different voltage and frequency, the ring could be made able to
provide thrust for a full-scale flying vehicle.

Tom Bearden. Tom Bearden, Stephen Patrick, James Hayes, Kenneth Moore and James Kenny were granted US Patent 6,362,718 on 26th March 2002. This patent is for an electromagnetic generator with no moving parts.
This device can be self-powered and is described on JL Naudin’s excellent site at
http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm where test results are shown. This device has been shown to have a greater output than its input and an output five times higher than the input has been mentioned.

The “Motionless Electromagnetic Generator” or “MEG” consists of a magnetic ring with output coils wound on
it.

Inside the ring is a permanent magnet to provide a steady magnetic flux around the ring.
Superimposed on the ring are two electromagnets which are activated one after the other to make the magnetic
flux oscillate. This is very much like Floyd Sweet’s “VTA” device.

The external power source shown above is intended to be disconnected when the circuit starts operating,
at which time, part of the output from one of the pick-up coils is fed back to power the circuit driving
the oscillator coils. The circuit then becomes self-sustaining, with no external input but with a
continuous electrical output.

If you should construct one of these, please be warned that it should not
be started up unless there is an external load across the pick-up coils, otherwise dangerous,
potentially lethal voltages can be produced. Don’t get yourself killed or injured – please be very careful.
A re-worded excerpt from the patent for this system, is in PatD4 of this set of documents and it gives the
construction details of the prototype: dimensions, number of turns, materials used, drive frequency,
monostable pulse durations, etc.

The prototype produced two outputs of 48 watts for one input of 12 watts.
This allowed the input power to be taken from one of the outputs, while that same output was powering other loads.

This device is essentially, a custom-built transformer with two primary windings (the oscillator coils) and
two secondary windings (the pick-up coils), with a permanent magnet inserted to create a standing magnetic field through the yoke (frame) of the transformer.

However, a permanent magnet has two separate energy streams coming from it.
The main field is the magnetic field which is very well known. It normally flows out in every direction,
but in the MEG, a very good conducting path is provided by the frame of the device. This traps the magnetic energy flow and channels it around inside the frame. This prevents it masking the second energy field which is the Electrical energy field.

With the magnetic field moved out of the way, it is now possible to tap this energy field for additional
power output. The MEG looks like a very simple device, but in actual fact, it is not. To act as a
successful device with a Coefficient of Performance (COP) over 1, where the input power which is provided is less than the useful power output of the device, then Tom says that the frame needs to be made from a nanocrystalline material. This material has special properties which give the MEG it’s exceptional output and it is described in Device Patents No 4. in this series of documents.

Care has to be taken with this device as the output power can be so high that it can burn the insulation
off the wires and destroy the device if the output power is not controlled carefully.
The output power is normally limited to a COP of 5.4 for practical reasons.
If the necessary input power is taken from the output power via a rigorous control circuit which prevents
runaway, then the device can provide output power while no outside input power is needed.
The output power is controlled by the waveform being sent to the oscillator coils.
The power is controlled by the exact shape of the “square wave” drive:

This waveform is adjusted carefully to keep the COP down to 5.4 for safety sake.
The waveform is also adjustable for frequency and Mark/Space ratio. As it is some years since this device
was patented, the question can be asked as to why it is not in production and offered for sale everywhere.
The reason is that the MEG is a laboratory prototype which needs careful adjustment and tweaking.
It has been replicated by others and it’s performance verified as being COP>1, but it is not yet ready for
production where it is necessary to have the design enhanced to the stage that it can be assembled in a
factory and work immediately without the need for manual adjustments. That development is in hand and may be completed in the next year or two.

Some further explanation is in order. The MEG has an overall efficiency, well below 100% in spite of having ( Coefficient Of Performance well in excess of 1. The COP of 5.4 mentioned earlier is an arbitrary figure selected by the designers to prevent the insulation being burnt off the output wires.
The actual maximum output is almost unlimited, certainly a COP of 100 is perfectly possible,
but quite unnecessary in practical terms.

If a standard laminated iron yoke is used for the MEG, it will never have a COP>1 as input power will be
needed to make it operate. The magnetic flux from a permanent magnet consists of two components.
One component is rotary and it spreads out in every direction.
The second component is linear and it gets swamped and hidden by the rotary field.

If a torroidal yoke wound with an input winding over its whole length is used, then that traps all of the
rotating magnetic field inside the torroid. The snag is that this requires considerable input power to
energise the torroidal winding. The big advance with the MEG is that the inventors have discovered some
standard off-the-shelf nanocrystalline materials which have the property of trapping the rotational magnetic field inside a torroid formed from them, without the need for any energising coil.
This is a major boost to the functioning of the device. Now, with the rotational magnetic field trapped
inside the torroid, the liner field becomes accessible, and it is a very useful field indeed.

It is electrical in nature. In actual fact, magnetism and electricity are not two separate things,
but instead, they are different aspects of the same thing, so both should really be referred to as
“electromagnetism”. Anyway, the linear field is easy to access once the rotational field has been removed.
All that is necessary is to pulse it sharply. When that is done, real electricity is introduced into the
MEG from the surrounding environment. The sharper the waveform, the greater the additional electrical input
becomes.

This is what makes the MEG have a COP of say, 5.4 which is a practical working output.
If the output is then manipulated to provide the input power needed for the pulsing, the COP effectively
becomes infinite as you do not have to provide any power to make it work and you have a substantial
power output. The power output divided by the power input you have to provide to make the device operate,
gives the COP rating, so any output divided by zero input, always gives infinity.


Dave Lawton has experimented with the MEG arrangement, using a professionally constructed custom
laminated iron yoke. He found that using the standard arrangement, he found no difference when he removed
the permanent magnet. Testing various configurations, he found that the most effective set-up for his
components is:

Here, the drive coils are both put asymmetrically on one side of the frame and wired so that their pulses
complement each other. Then two pairs of button magnets are placed on the other side of the centreline,
each side of the yoke, and bridged together with two straight vertical sections of laminated iron bar.
This arrangement is sensitive to the exact position of these magnets and tuning is achieved by moving the
group of four magnets and two bars (effectively two “horseshoe” magnets) slightly left or right to find
the optimum position.

Introducing or removing these magnets then made a considerable difference to the operation of the device.
There are other devices which are very close to the MEG construction. One of these is at present being
displayed on the web page http://www.inkomp-delta.com/page8.html, though for full understanding of what is being said, considerable language skills are needed as the translation programs fail dramatically when asked to translate this information.

However, the following information appears to be displayed there by Elin Pelin and Valeri Ivanov and
dated 11th February 2007:

An effective device can be constructed from a permanent magnet, a toroid and a laminated iron yoke.
The arrangement is displayed like this:

It appears that when the switch is made from State 1 to State 2, that a rotating magnetic field is set up
in the toroid. Presumably, the switching will be caused by pulsing a coil wound around the yoke and the
output power pick-up from a coil around the toroid like this:
If you are fluent in Russian (or whatever language is used on the web site) it would be most helpful if
you would let me know if this description is accurate, and if there are any important additional details
which need to be stressed, or ant experimental results which it would be useful to know about.

The Phi-Transformer. Toriodal shapes are clearly important in many devices which pull in additional energy from the environment, even to the extent that Bob Boyce warns against the high-frequency sequential pulsing of coils wound on a toroid yoke, producing a rotating magnetic field as unpredictable surge events can generate some 10,000 amps of additional current which will burn out the circuit components and can very well trigger a radiant energy build up which can create a lightning strike.

Bob himself has been hit by just such a lightning strike and he is lucky to have survived. Lesser systems
such as the toroid transformer used in Bob’s electrolyser system are safe even though they generate a power gain. So the many toroidal system designs are definitely worth examining. One of these is the
“Phi-Transformer” which looks like a somewhat similar arrangement to the MEG described above.

However, it operates in quite a different way: Here, lines of magnetic flux coming from a permanent magnet are channelled through a laminated yoke which is effectively a circular mains transformer core.
The difference is in the fact that instead of electronically driving a coil to alter the flux coming from
the permanent magnet, in this system the magnet is rotated by a small motor.
The performance of this device is impressive. The power required to rotate the magnet is not unduly
affected by the current drawn from the coils.

The flux is channelled through the laminated iron core and in tests an output of 1200 watts for an input of
140 watts has been achieved, and that is a COP of 8.5 which is very respectable, especially for such a simple device.

The Dave Squires Generator.

At http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/dsqromg2.htm a generator design is shown,
dated 1999. All attempts to contact Dave Squires have been unsuccessful, so it is not known if the
information there is from tests on a device which has actually been built or if it is just a theoretical
design, though it is likely that it was not built at that time.

A central core is produced by casting the shape shown below, using an amorphous iron powder / epoxy mix. However, as the operating frequency is low at only 50 Hz or 60 Hz, there does not seem to be any reason why normal transformer laminations should not be used, in which case six sets of shims shaped like this:
which would make the winding of the coils very much easier as standard bobbins could be slotted into place as the core yoke is being assembled. However, the complete core is shaped like this with coils placed in the slots: The thinking behind this arrangement is that the “back-EMF” magnetic flux which normally causes Lenz Law opposition to the free rotation of the magnets around the toroid, is diverted around behind the coil and turned so that instead of hindering the rotation, it actually assists it: The speed of rotation is quoted as being 1,000 rpm for 50 Hz and 1,200 rpm for 60 Hz, which appears incorrect to me, there being six pulses per rotation, so 500 rpm and 600 rpm would appear the actual rates of rotation required. The coil windings are suggested as being 180 turns of AWG 14 (16 SWG) for 120 volts AC, at a supposed current of 100 amps, which is quite unrealistic as the maximum current for that size of wire is 5.9 amps. The magnets are 2 inches long, 1 inch deep neodymium set into a circular rotor of 12 inch diameter. There can, of course, be more than one rotor on a single shaft, and the number of turns would be doubled for 240 volts AC output.

The yoke on which the coils are wound is effectively a series of toroids, though admittedly, not exactly
circular is shape. An alternative shape which might be considered would be as shown below where the
section carrying the magnetic flux for any one coil is more isolated from the other toroids.
It is not clear if making the section which passes through the coil, straight rather than curved,
so I will leave that detail to people who are expert in magnetics.

Dan Davidson.

Dan has produced a system rather similar to the ‘MEG’ described above. His system is
different in that he uses an acoustic device to vibrate a magnet which forms the core of a transformer.
This is said to increase the output by a substantial amount. His arrangement looks like this:

Dan’s patent forms part of this set of documents and it gives details of the types of acoustic transducers
which are suitable for this generator design.

Pavel Imris. Pavel was awarded a US patent in the 1970’s.
The patent is most interesting in that it describes a device which can have an output power which is more
than nine times greater than the input power. He achieves this with a device which has two pointed
electrodes enclosed in a quartz glass envelope which contains xenon gas under pressure
(the higher the pressure, the greater the gain of the device) and a dielectric material.

Here, the power supply to one or more standard fluorescent lamps is passed through the device.

This produces a power gain which can be spectacular when the gas pressure in the area marked ‘24’ and ‘25’ in the above diagram is high. The patent is included in this set of documents and it contains the following table of experimental measurements: Table 1 shows the data to be obtained relating to the optical electrostatic generator.

Table 2 shows the lamp performance and efficiency for each of the tests shown in Table 1. The following is
a description of the data in each of the columns of Tables 1 and 2.

Column Description B Gas used in discharge tube

C Gas pressure in tube (in torrs) D Field strength across
the tube (measured in volts per cm. of length between the electrodes)

E Current density (measured in microamps per sq. mm. of tube cross-sectional area)

F Current (measured in amps) G Power across the tube (calculated in watts per cm. of length between the
electrodes)

H Voltage per lamp (measured in volts)

K Current (measured in amps)

L Resistance (calculated in ohms)

M Input power per lamp (calculated in watts)

N Light output (measured in lumens) Table 1 Optical Generator Section A B C D E F G Test No. Type of discharge Pressure of Xenon Field strength Current density Current Power str. across lamp
lamp across lamp (Torr) (V/cm) (A/sq.mm) (A) (W/cm.) 1 Mo elec – – – – – 2 Xe 0.01 11.8 353 0.1818 2.14 3 Xe 0.10 19.6 353 0.1818 3.57 4 Xe 1.00 31.4 353 0.1818 5.72 5 Xe 10.00 47.2 353 0.1818 8.58 6 Xe 20.00 55.1 353 0.1818 10.02 7 Xe 30.00 62.9 353 0.1818 11.45 8 Xe 40.00 66.9 353 0.1818 12.16 9 Xe 60.00 70.8 353 0.1818 12.88 10 Xe 80.00 76.7 353 0.1818 13.95 11 Xe 100.00 78.7 353 0.1818 14.31 12 Xe 200.00 90.5 353 0.1818 16.46 13 Xe 300.00 100.4 353 0.1818 18.25 14 Xe 400.00 106.3 353 0.1818 19.32 15 Xe 500.00 110.2 353 0.1818 20.04 16 Xe 600.00 118.1 353 0.1818 21.47 17 Xe 700.00 120.0 353 0.1818 21.83 18 Xe 800.00 122.8 353 0.1818 22.33 19 Xe 900.00 125.9 353 0.1818 22.90 20 Xe 1,000.00 127.9 353 0.1818 23.26 21 Xe 2,000.00 149.6 353 0.1818 27.19 22 Xe 3,000.00 161.4 353 0.1818 29.35 23 Xe 4,000.00 173.2 353 0.1818 31.49 24 Xe 5,000.00 179.1 353 0.1818 32.56
Table 2 Fluorescent Lamp Section A H K L M N Test No. Voltage Current Resistance Input Energy Light Output (Volts) (Amps) (Ohms) (Watts) (Lumen) 1 220 0.1818 1,210 40.00 3,200 2 218 0.1818 1,199 39.63 3,200 3 215 0.1818 1,182 39.08 3,200 4 210 0.1818 1,155 38.17 3,200 5 200 0.1818 1,100 36.36 3,200 6 195 0.1818 1,072 35.45 3,200 7 190 0.1818 1,045 34.54 3,200 8 182 0.1818 1,001 33.08 3,200 9 175 0.1818 962 31.81 3,200 10 162 0.1818 891 29.45 3,200 11 155 0.1818 852 28.17 3,200 12 130 0.1818 715 23.63 3,200 13 112 0.1818 616 20.36 3,200 14 100 0.1818 550 18.18 3,200 15 85 0.1818 467 15.45 3,200 16 75 0.1818 412 13.63 3,200 17 67 0.1818 368 12.18 3,200 18 60 0.1818 330 10.90 3,200 19 53 0.1818 291 9.63 3,200 20 50 0.1818 275 9.09 3,200 21 23 0.1818 126 4.18 3,200 22 13 0.1818 71 2.35 3,200 23 8 0.1818 44 1.45 3,200 24 5 0.1818 27 0.90 3,200 The results from Test No. 24 where the gas pressure is a very high 5,000 Torr, show that the input power for each 40-watt standard fluorescent tubes is 0.9 watts for full lamp output. In other words, each lamp is working to its full specification on less than one fortieth of its rated input power. However, the power taken by the device in that test was 333.4 watts which with the 90 watts needed to run the 100 lamps, gives a total input electrical power of 423.4 watts instead of the 4,000 watts which would have been needed without the device. That is an output power of more than nine times the input power. From the point of view of any individual lamp, without using this device, it requires 40 watts of electrical input power to give 8.8 watts of light output which is an efficiency of about 22% (the rest of the input power being converted to heat). In test 24, the input power per lamp is 0.9 watts for the 8.8 watts of light produced, which is a lamp efficiency of more than 900%. The lamp used to need 40 watts of input power to perform correctly. With this device in the circuit, each lamp only needs 0.9 watts of input power which is only 2.25% of the original power.

Graham Gunderson Quite an impressive performance for so simple a device! Graham Gunderson On 27th July 2006, a patent application from Graham Gunderson for a Solid State Electric Generator was published (number US 2006/0163971 A1).

The details are as follows: Abstract A solid-state electrical generator including at least one
permanent magnet, magnetically coupled to a ferromagnetic core provided with at least one hole penetrating its volume; the hole(s) and magnet(s) being placed so that the hole(s) intercept flux from the permanent magnet(s) coupled into the ferromagnetic core.

A first wire coil is wound around the ferromagnetic core for the purpose of moving the coupled permanent magnet flux within the ferromagnetic core.

A second wire is routed through the hole(s) penetrating the volume of the ferromagnetic core, for the purpose of intercepting this moving magnetic flux, thereby inducing an output electromotive force.

A changing voltage applied to the first wire coil causes coupled permanent magnet flux to move within the core relative to the hole(s) penetrating the core volume, thus inducing electromotive force along wire(s) passing through the hole(s) in the ferromagnetic core.

The mechanical action of an electrical generator is therefore synthesised without the use of moving parts.

Background This invention relates to a method and device for generating electrical power using solid state means. It has long been known that moving a magnetic field across a wire will generate an electromotive force (EMF), or voltage, along the wire. When this wire is connected in a closed electrical circuit, an electric current, capable of performing work, is driven through this closed circuit by the induced
electromotive force.

It has also long been known that this resulting electric current causes the closed circuit to become
encircled with a secondary, induced magnetic field, whose polarity opposes the primary magnetic field which first induced the EMF. this magnetic opposition creates mutual repulsion as a moving magnet approaches such a closed circuit, and a mutual attraction as that moving magnet moves away from the closed circuit. Both these actions tend to slow or cause “drag” on the progress of the moving magnet, causing the electric generator to act as a magnetic brake, whose effect is in direct proportion to the amount of electric current produced.

Historically, gas engines, hydroelectric dams and steam-fed turbines have been used to overcome this magnetic braking action which occurs within mechanical generators. A large amount of mechanical power is required to produce a large amount of electrical power, since the magnetic braking is generally proportional to the amount of electrical power being generated. There has long been felt the need for a generator which reduces or eliminates the well-known magnetic braking interaction, while nevertheless generating useful electric power.

The need for convenient, economical and powerful sources of renewable energy remains urgent.
When the magnetic fields within a generator are caused to move and interact by means other than applied mechanical force, electric power can be supplied without the necessity of consuming limited natural resources, thus with far greater economy.

Summary of the Invention It has long been known that the source of the magnetism within a permanent magnet is a spinning electric current within ferromagnetic atoms of certain elements, persisting indefinitely in accord with well-defined quantum rules.
This atomic current encircles every atom, thereby causing each atom to emit a magnetic field, as a miniature electromagnet. This atomic current does not exist in magnets alone. It also exists in ordinary metallic iron, and in any element or metallic alloy which can be “magnetised”, that is, any material which exhibits ferromagnetism.

All ferromagnetic atoms and “magnetic metals” contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.
In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible.
The orientation of magnetic flux both internal and external to the material, pivots easily.
Such materials are referred to as magnetically “soft”, due to this magnetic flexibility.

Permanent magnet materials are magnetically “hard”.

The orientation axis of each is fixed in place within a rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move.
This constraint aligns the field of ordinary magnets permanently, hence the name “permanent”.

The axis of circular current flow in one ferromagnetic atom can direct the axis of magnetism within another ferromagnetic atom, through a process known as “spin exchange”. This gives a soft magnetic material, like raw iron, the useful ability to aim, focus and redirect the magnetic field emitted from a magnetically hard permanent magnet. In the present invention, a permanent magnet’s rigid field is sent into a magnetically flexible “soft” magnetic material. the permanent magnet’s apparent location, observed from points within the magnetically soft material, will effectively move, vibrate, and appear to shift position when the magnetisation of the soft magnetic material is modulated by ancillary means (much like the sun, viewed while underwater, appears to move when the water is agitated). By this mechanism, the motion required for generation of electricity can be synthesised within a soft magnetic material, without requiring physical movement or an applied mechanical force.

The present invention synthesises the virtual motion of magnets and their magnetic fields, without the need for mechanical action or moving parts, to produce the electrical generator described here.
The present invention describes an electrical generator where magnetic braking known as expressions of
Lenz’s Law, do not oppose the means by which the magnetic field energy is caused to move.

The synthesised magnetic motion is produced without either mechanical or electrical resistance.
This synthesised magnetic motion is aided by forces generated in accordance with Lenz’s Law, in order to
produce acceleration of the synthesised magnetic motion, instead of physical “magnetic braking” common to mechanically-actuated electrical generators.

Because of this novel magnetic interaction, the solid-state static generator of the present invention is a
robust generator, requiring only a small electric force of operate.

Brief Description of the Drawings The appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this
invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, as the invention encompasses
other equally effective embodiments. Fig.1 is an exploded view of the generator of this invention.

Fig.2 is a cross-sectional elevation of the generator of this invention.

Fig.3 is a schematic diagram of the magnetic action occurring within the generator of Fig.1 and Fig.2.

Fig.4 is a circuit diagram, illustrating one method of operating the electrical generator of this invention. Detailed Description of the Invention Fig.1 depicts a partially exploded view of an embodiment of an electrical generator of this invention. The part numbers also apply in Fig.2 and Fig.3. Numeral 1 represents a permanent magnet with it’s North pole pointing inward towards the soft ferromagnetic core of the device. Similarly, numeral 2 indicates permanent magnets (preferably of the same size, shape and composition), with their South poles aimed inward towards the opposite side, or opposite surface of the device. The letters “S” and “N” denote these magnetic poles in the drawings. Other magnetic polarities and configurations may be used with success; the pattern shown merely illustrates one efficient method of adding magnets to the core.
The magnets may be formed of any polarised magnetic material. In order of descending effectiveness, the most desirable permanent magnet materials are Neodymium-Iron-Boron (“NIB”), Samarium Cobalt, AlNiCo alloy, or “ceramic” Strontium-Barium or Lead-Ferrite.

A primary factor determining permanent magnet material composition is the magnetic flux strength of the particular material type. In an embodiment of the invention, these magnets may also be substituted with one or more electromagnets producing the required magnetic flux. In another embodiment of the invention, a superimposed DC current bias can be applied to the output wire to generate the required magnetic flux, replacing or augmenting the permanent magnets.

Numeral 3 indicates the magnetic core.
This core is a critical component of the generator.
The core determines the output power capacity, the optimum magnet type, the electrical impedance and the operating frequency range. the core may be any shape, composed of any ferromagnetic material, formed by any process (sintering, casting, adhesive bonding, tape-winding, etc.).

A wide range of shapes, materials
and processes is known in the art of making magnetic cores. Effective common materials include amorphous metal alloys (such as sold under the “Metglas” trademark by Metglas Inc., Conway, S.C.), nanocrystalline alloys, manganese and zinc ferrites as well as ferrites of any suitable element including any combination of magnetically “hard” and “soft” ferrites, powdered metals and ferromagnetic alloys, laminations of cobalt and/or iron and silicon-iron “electrical steel”.

This invention successfully utilises any ferromagnetic material, while functioning as claimed.
In an embodiment of the invention, and for the purpose of illustration, a circular “toroid” core is
illustrated. In an embodiment of the invention, the composition may be bonded iron powder, commonly
available from many manufacturers. regardless of core type, the core is prepared with holes, through which,
wires may pass. the holes are drilled or formed to penetrate the core’s ferromagnetic volume.

The toroidal core 3 shown, includes radial holes pointing towards a common centre. If, for example, stiff
wire rods were to be inserted through each of these holes, these rods would meet at the centre point of
the core, producing an appearance similar to a spoked wheel. If a square or rectangular core
(not illustrated) is used, then these holes are preferably oriented parallel to the core’s flat sides,
causing stiff rods passed through the holes to form a square grid pattern, as the rods cross each other
in the interior “window” area framed by the core.
While in other embodiments of the invention, these holes may take any possible orientation or patterns of
orientation, a simple row of radial holes is illustrated as one example.

Numeral 4 depicts a wire, or bundle of wires which pick up and carry the output power of the generator.
Typically, this wire is composed of insulated copper, though other materials such as aluminium, iron,
dielectric material, polymers and semiconducting materials may be substituted.

It may be seen in Fig.1 and Fig.2, that wire 4 passes alternately through neighbouring holes formed in core 3.
The path taken by wire 4 undulates as it passes in opposite direction through each adjacent hole.
If an even number of holes is used, the wire will emerge on the same side of the core on which it
first entered. Once all the holes are filled, the resulting pair of trailing leads may be twisted
together or similarly terminated, forming the output terminals of the generator shown at numeral 5.
Output wire 4, may also make multiple passes through each hole in the core. though the winding pattern is
not necessarily undulatory, this basic form is shown as an example.

Many effective connection styles exist. This illustration shows the most simple.

Numeral 6 in Fig.1, Fig.2 and Fig.3, points to a partial illustration of the input winding,

or inductive
coil used to shift the fields of the permanent magnets, within the core. Typically, this wire coil encircles
the core, wrapping around it. For the toroidal core shown, input coil 6 resembles the outer windings of a
typical toroidal inductor – a common electrical component. For the sake of clarity, only a few turns of
coil 6 are shown in each of Fig.1, Fig.2 and Fig.3.

In practice, this coil may cover the entire core, or specific sections of the core, including, or not
including the magnets.

Fig.2 shows the same electrical generator of Fig.1, looking transparently “down” through it from above, so
that the relative positions of the core holes (shown as dotted lines), the path of the output wire 4, and
the position of the magnets (white hatched areas for magnets under the core and green hatched areas for magnets above the core) are made clear. The few representative turns of the input coil 6 are shown in red in Fig.2. The generator illustrated, uses a core with 8 radially drilled holes. The spacing between these
holes is equal. As shown, each hole is displaced by 45 degrees from each of it’s adjoining holes.

The centres of all of the holes lie on a common plane lying half-way down the vertical thickness of the core.
Cores of any shape or size may have as few as two or as many as hundreds of holes and a similar number of magnets.

Other variations exist, such as generators with multiple rows of holes, zigzag and diagonal patterns,
or output wire 4 moulded directly into the core material.
In any case, the basic magnetic interaction shown in Fig.3 occurs for each hole in the core as described below.

Fig.3 shows the same design, viewed from the side. The curvature of the core is shown flattened on the page for the purpose of illustration. The magnets are represented schematically, protruding from the top and bottom of the core, and including arrows indicating the direction of magnetic flux (the arrow heads point to the magnet’s North pole). In practice, the free, unattached polar ends of the generator’s magnets may be left “as-is” in open air, or they may be provided with a common ferromagnetic path linking the unattached North and South poles together as a magnetic “ground”. The common return path is typically made of steel, iron or similar material, taking the form of a ferrous enclosure housing the device.

It may serve the additional purpose of a protecting chassis. The magnetic return may also be another
ferromagnetic core of a similar electric generator stacked on top of the illustrated generator.
There can be a stack of generators, sharing common magnets between the generator cores.
Any such additions are without direct bearing on the functional principle of the generator itself,
and have therefore been omitted from these illustrations. Two example flux diagrams are shown in Fig.3.
Each example is shown in a space between schematically depicted partial input coils 6.

A positive or negative polarity marker indicates the direction of input current, applied through the input
coil.
This applied current produces “modulating” magnetic flux, which is used to synthesise apparent motion of the permanent magnets, and is shown as a double-tailed horizontal arrow (a) along the core 3.

Each example shows this double-tailed arrow (a) pointing to the right or to the left, depending on the
polarity of the applied current. In either case, vertical flux entering the core (b,3) from the external
permanent magnets (1,2) is swept along within the core, in the direction of the double-tailed arrow (a),
representing the magnetic flux of the input coil.

These curved arrows (b) in the space between the magnets and the holes, can be seen to shift or bend
(a –> b), as if they were streams or jets of air subject to a changing wind. The resulting sweeping motion
of the fields of the permanent magnets, causes their flux (b) to brush back and forth over the holes and wire
4 which passes through these holes.


Just as in a mechanical generator, when the magnetic flux brushes or “cuts” sideways across a conductor in this way, voltage is induced in the conductor. If an electrical load is connected across the ends of this
wire conductor (numeral 5 in Fig.1 and Fig.2), a current flows through the load via this closed circuit,
delivering electrical power able to perform work.
Input of an alternating current across the input coil 6, generates an alternating magnetic field
(a) causing the fields of permanent magnets 1 and 2 to shift (b) within the core 3, inducing electrical power through a load (attached to terminals 5), as if the fixed magnets (1,2) themselves were physically moving.

However, no mechanical motion is present. In a mechanical generator, induced current powering an electrical load, returns through output wire 4, creating a secondary induced magnetic field, exerting forces which substantially oppose the original magnetic field inducing the original EMF. Since load currents induce their own, secondary magnetic fields opposing the original act of induction in this way, the source of the original induction requires additional energy to restore itself and continue generating electricity.
In mechanical generators, the energy-inducing motion of the generator’s magnetic fields is being physically actuated, requiring a strong prime mover (such as a steam turbine) to restore the EMF-generating magnetic fields’ motion against the braking effect of the output-induced magnetic fields

(the induced field c and the inducing field b), destructively in mutual opposition, which must ultimately be
overcome by physical force, which is commonly produced by the consumption of other energy resources.
The electrical generator of the present invention is not actuated by mechanical force. It makes use of the
induced secondary magnetic field in such a way as to not cause opposition, but instead, addition and resulting acceleration of magnetic field motion.
Because the present invention is not mechanically actuated, and because the magnetic fields do not act to destroy one another in mutual opposition, the present invention does not require the consumption of natural resources in order to generate electricity.

The present generator’s induced magnetic field, resulting from electrical current flowing through the load
and returning through output wire 4, is that of a closed loop encircling each hole in the core.

The induced magnetic fields create magnetic flux in the form of closed loops within the ferromagnetic core.
The magnetic field “encircles” each hole in the core which carries output wire 4.

This is similar to the threads of a screw “encircling” the shaft of the screw. Within this generator,
the magnetic field from output wire 4 immediately encircles each hole formed in the core (c).
since wire 4 may take an opposing direction through each neighbouring hole, the direction of the resulting magnetic field will likewise be opposite.
The direction of arrows (b) and (c) are, at each hole, opposing, headed in opposite directions, since (b) is the inducing flux and (c) is the induced flux, each opposing one another while generating electricity.

However, this magnetic opposition is effectively directed against the permanent magnets which are injecting their flux into the core, but not the source of the alternating magnetic input field 6.
In the present solid-state generator, induced output flux (4,c) is directed to oppose the permanent magnets (1,2) not the input flux source (6, a) which is synthesising the virtual motion of those magnets (1,2) by it’s magnetising action on core 3. The present generator employs magnets as the source of motive pressure driving the generator, since they are the entity being opposed or “pushed against” by the
opposing reaction induced by output current which is powering a load. Experiments show that high-quality permanent magnets can be magnetically “pushed against” in this way for very long periods of time, before becoming demagnetised or “spent”.

Fig.3 illustrates inducing representative flux arrows (b) directed oppositely against induced representative
flux (c). In materials typically used to form core 3, fields flowing in mutually opposite directions tend
to cancel each other, just as positive and negative numbers of equal magnitude sum to zero. On the remaining side of each hole, opposite the permanent magnet, no mutual opposition takes place. Induced flux (c) caused by the generator load current remains present; however, inducing flux from the permanent magnets (b) is not present since no magnet is present, on this side, to provide the necessary flux.

This leaves the induced flux (c) encircling the hole, as well as input flux (a) from the input coils 6,
continuing its path along the core, on either side of each hole.

On the side of each hole in the core where a magnet is present, action (b) and reaction (c) magnetic flux
substantially cancel each other, being directed in opposite directions within the core. On the other side
of each hole, where no magnet is present, input flux (a) and reaction flux (c) share a common direction.

Magnetic flux adds together in these zones, where induced magnetic flux (c) aids the input flux (a).
This is the reverse of typical generator action, where induced flux (c) is typically opposing the “input”
flux originating the induction. Since the magnetic interaction is a combination of magnetic flux
opposition and magnetic flux acceleration, there is no longer an overall magnetic braking or total
opposition effect. The braking and opposition is counterbalanced by a simultaneous magnetic acceleration within the core. Since mechanical motion is absent, the equivalent electrical effect ranges
from idling, or absence of opposition, to a strengthening and overall acceleration of the electrical input signal (within coils 6).

proper selection of the permanent magnet (1,2) material and flux density, core 3 material magnetic
characteristics, core hole pattern and spacing, and output medium connection technique, create embodiments
where the present generator will display an absence of electrical loading at the input and/or an overall
amplification of the input signal.

this ultimately causes less input energy to be required in order to work the generator.
Therefore, as increasing amounts of energy are withdrawn from the generator as output power performing useful
work, decreasing amounts of energy are generally required to operate it.

This process continues, working against the permanent magnets (1,2) until they are demagnetised.

In an embodiment of this invention, Fig.4 illustrates a typical operating circuit employing the generator
of this invention. A square-wave input signal from a transistor switching circuit, is applied at the input
terminals (S), to the primary (a) of a step-down transformer 11. The secondary winding (b) of the input
transformer may be a single turn, in series with a capacitor 12 and the generator 13 input coil (c),
forming a series resonant circuit.

The frequency of the applied square wave (S) must either match, or be an integral sub-harmonic of the
resonant frequency of this 3-element transformer-capacitor-inductor input circuit. Generator 13 output
winding (d) is connected to resistive load L through switch 14. When switch 14 is closed, generated power
is dissipated at L, which is any resistive load, for example, and incandescent lamp or resistive heater.
Once input resonance is achieved, and the square-wave frequency applied at S is such that the combined
reactive impedance of total inductance (b + c) is equal in magnitude to the opposing reactive impedance
of capacitance 12, the electrical phases of current through, and voltage across, generator 13 input coil (c)
will flow 90 degrees apart in resonant quadrature.

Power drawn from the square-wave input energy source applied to S will now be at a minimum. In this
condition, the resonant energy present at the generator
input may be measured by connecting a voltage probe across the test points (v), situated across the
generator input coil, together with a current probe around point (I), situated in series with the generator
input coil
(c). The instantaneous vector product of these two measurements indicates the energy circulating at the
generator’s input, ultimately shifting the permanent magnets’ fields in order to create useful induction.
This situation persists until the magnets are no longer magnetised. It will be apparent to those skilled
in the art that a square (or other) wave may be applied directly to the generator input terminals (c)
without the use of other components.

While this remains effective, advantageous re-generating effects may not be realised to their fullest extent
with such direct excitation. Use of a resonant circuit, particularly with inclusion of a capacitor 12 as
suggested, facilitates recirculation of energy within the input circuit, generally producing efficient
excitation and a reduction of the required input power as loads are applied.

Charles Flynn The technique
of applying magnetic variations to the magnetic flux produced by a permanent magnet is covered in detail in


the patents of Charles Flynn which are shown in the “PatD20” document in this set.
In his patent he shows techniques for producing linear motion, reciprocal motion, circular motion and power conversion, and he gives a considerable amount of description and explanation on each, his main patent containing a hundred illustrations. Taking one application at random: He states that a substantial
enhancement of magnetic flux can be obtained from the use of an arrangement like this: Here, a laminated


soft iron frame has a powerful permanent magnet positioned in it’s centre and six coils are wound in the
positions shown. The magnetic flux from the permanent magnet flows around both sides of the frame.

pyramids

10000 BC Crimea, before the deluge or big flood. Breaking-up or destruction of planet Tiamat and is now our asteroid belt.


HISTORY

The hidden pyramids of Crimea

by ELLA STER on 21 MARCH 2022  2 COMMENTS

In 1999, scientist Vitaly Gokh discovered a unique complex of seven underground pyramids in Crimea. Later, his team discovered dozens of other pyramids, partly underground and above ground, that were built according to a fixed structure. Under one pyramid they also found a sphinx. The pyramids turn out to be of special historical value.

Vitaly Gokh at the site of his discovery

Vitaly Gokh was doing research at this site to find underground water sources when he discovered the pyramids. Because the area of Sevastopol was known for its poor water supply, he developed an instrument to search for underground drinking water. As a former engineer, he was well acquainted with instruments that use magnetic resonance and had built a device himself.

Vitaly Gokh

As early as the summer of 1999, his instrument had uncovered an underground anomaly on the outskirts of Sevastopol, southwestern Crimea. They found an opening there that led down. After further digging, several limestone blocks were found. When it turned out that these had regular dimensions of approximately 1.5 by 2.5 meters, it was assumed that they were made by man. After analyzing an area of thirty meters, the team realized that they had discovered a pyramid.

The problem was: the pyramid was underground. However, Vitaly Gokh was also able to perform vertical measurements with improved instruments and was also able to confirm the square structure of the pyramid. Each side was 72 meters long, the height was about 45-52 meters, with the top almost at ground level.

Above-ground pyramids disappeared due to floods underground

Excavation work also revealed that the surrounding layers showed signs that the pyramid had originally been above ground, but that flooding had caused the area to be flooded. These floods had also brought clay and other silt.

The pyramids of Crimea are arranged in a certain order and aligned with each other.

Later, a whole chain of pyramidal structures was discovered in the region, the height of which varies from 36 to 62 meters. These had remained hidden from scientists and the local inhabitants for a long time, because they were completely underground. The tops of the pyramids are located only a few meters from the earth’s surface. The estimated age of the structures is said to be 7-10 thousand years.

A total of 37 pyramids have been discovered in Crimea, some of which have a three-sided shape, unlike the four-sided Egyptian pyramids. The special structure of the locations of the pyramids in crimea, is well mapped. In the vicinity of the village of Krasny Mak is a central 56 meter high pyramid. This is surrounded by several chains of pyramids. To the east of it is a smaller structure with also a pyramid in the middle.

In the rock of mountain fortress of Balaklava you can clearly see a pyramid shape. From the western Kozacha bay of Sevastopol runs a pyramid chain to Balaklava in the southeast.

The scientists who discovered these pyramids met with considerable resistance from the ukrainian authorities at the time. Vitaly Goh was the first to bring out the discovery of the pyramids in crimea.

Certificate of the Scientific Discovery of the Crimean Pyramids by a group of scientists led by Vitaly Gokh, issued on October 24, 1999 by the International Academy of Energy Information Sciences (international non-governmental, public creative, self-governing and self-funding higher scientific institution).

Pyramidal structures in the landscape of Krasny Mak, east of Sevastopol.

Similarities with Egyptian pyramids

A few years later, another unique pyramidal complex was discovered in the mountainous Crimea that, unlike the underground pyramids, is located in the rock. These differ in shape from the previously discovered pyramids: they have a rounded shape with a truncated top. This makes them look like one of the oldest and most mysterious pyramids in Egypt, the pyramid of Djoser.

The pyramids on the southwest coast of Crimea, near the city of Sudak

Of all the pyramids found in Crimea, the pyramid in the Ai-Petri region is recognized as the largest. A statue of a sphinx was also found under one of them, and it “looks” — unlike the Egyptian sphinx — to the west. After a comparative analysis of the opening of the pyramid of Giza and the pyramid of crimea, it turned out to everyone’s great surprise that both pyramids were made of the same material.

The sphinx is built into the underground pyramid. At the top of the pyramid there are 3 ventilation shafts. In the head of the sphinx is a ‘camera’ that is also connected to ventilation shafts.

Energy resonators

The Crimean Peninsula contains many unsolved mysteries. The pyramids are one of them. The historical value of the pyramids lies in their deep content of powerful energy, which they accumulate through the geometry of shapes. Created fields within these objects make it possible to neutralize negative energy and convert it into positive energy. The question is: who made these energy converters and for what purpose?

The suspicion is that the pyramids are double like an octahedron, which is a regular octahedron, a spatial figure bounded by eight equilateral triangles. From the base of the pyramids, crystal lattices of similar pyramids have been built at the bottom. These have the tops facing down, which provides a connection to the earth’s core.

The scheme of the pyramids’ energy interaction with the stars and with the earth’s core, proposed by a group of scientists led by Vitaly Gokh.

The scientists led by Vitaly Gokh think that the pyramids of Crimea thus maintain the earth’s energy balance. The radiation from the edges of the pyramids affects the state of our planet’s tectonic plates and transmits this energy to space, using special subtle (torsion) energies.

In addition, the honeycomb structure plays a role, which is characteristic of the Crimean pyramids. The edges — with equal gaps in strict order — are interspersed with oval structures. These are energy information capsules, the internal cavities of which are filled with compressed carbon dioxide (CO2), so that the entire structure resembles a crystal lattice. As a result, the honeycomb edges of the pyramids act as energy resonators, a kind of antenna emitter, which transmit energy information.

According to Gokh, these pyramids were part of a global system, where they were used to receive and transmute cosmic energy and then spread it across the planet. He thinks the pyramids were scientific tools to control and stabilize the land masses of planet earth. According to him, the construction of this system would be about 16,000 years old, or date from 14,000 BC.

Despite these extraordinary archaeological discoveries, which moreover do not fit into the official narrative of the history of human civilization, little attention has been paid to the hidden pyramids in crimea. Perhaps this is just one of the country’s hidden treasures and another reason why the Republic of Crimea is of great geopolitical value.

Bronnen:

Alien civilisations:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is elite-illuminati-1024x576.jpg
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is magnetic-poles-flipping.jpg
HOM

EINTRODUCTIONEARTH’S NUCLEUS NEW MODELTORSION TECHNOLOGIESCOMMERCIAL PROPOSALEXPLORATION REPORTWATER IN THE DESERTWORLD PYRAMID SYSTEMCRIMEAN PYRAMIDS vitalygoh@yahoo.com
 EARTH’S NUCLEUS
AND ROLE OF THE PYRAMIDS
IN CONTROL OF ITS PROCESSES.


Current opinion that the Earth’s nucleus consists of iron and nickel is based upon seismic observation data, without taking into consideration thermophysical characteristics of mentioned metals. Actually, iron and nickel are characterized by high thermo-conductivity and relatively low thermal heat capacity. That’s why both the Earth itself and its nucleus should have got cold for a thousand years’ period only. Then, what is the source of the volcanoes, geothermal waters and hot oil?
 
The research, conducted by means of quantum generator for scanning the Earth’s nucleus as well as special test attachments, enabled to determine its real diameter and composition with great precision. The Earth’s nucleus consists of 7 shells, varying in thickness and composition. The nucleus radius is equal to 2340+30 Km. The thickness of the outer layer is about 430 Km. It is on alloy of sand and clay with insertions of graphite, diamonds, ruby and other crystals. The next shell is about 220 Km. and is composed of a various liquid metals’ conglomerate: lead, platinum, gold, silver, copper, nickel, tin, etc. The thickness of the next shell is about 90 Km. and is composed of liquid lead. The next shell is approximately 360 Km. long and is composed of uranium. The next shell is about 70 Km. long, is composed of graphite, serves as delay mechanism and reflector of neutrons. Under this shell we can found 90 Km. layers of inert gases. It is the zone of convective thermo exchange in the gas area of the nucleus. The central part of the nucleus is composed of the of light gas elements, which participate in the reaction of thermonuclear fusion as well as its products (hydrogen, deuterium, tritium, helium, nitrogen, carbonic acid, lithium, methane, oxygen, etc.). The thickness of this shell is about 720 Km by radius. Thus, it has for the first time been found, that the reactions of nuclear fusion are being happened in the earth’s nucleus. These processes are of the same nature with those, being happened inside the sun. Following the exhaust of the matter, which participates in the reactions, a gradual decrease of temperature should have been occurred. However, owing to the circumstances, beyond our understanding, things are going another way. Since, the volcanic activity increases from time to time, we have a sound reason to believe that alongside with nuclear fusion reactions, the processes of uranium accumulation and fusion are being underway. However, influences of other factors are admittable. Thus, for example, comparing an explosive nature of solar reactions with rather calm processes inside the Earth’s nucleus, it seems reasonable to believe that certain energies could exist. These hypothetic energies might control and restrain nuclear fusion and decay as well as additionally heat metallic nucleus shells.Having analyzed energy exchange in the Great Pyramids of Egypt as well as Seven Sevastopol Pyramids, which have been found by us, the author came to the following conclusions:    – the high frequency cosmic energy comes to the tops of the whole group of the Pyramids through 3 channels, varying in frequency. Inside the Pyramid this energy is converting into low-frequency one, and is summarizing and penetrates by a focused beam down to graphite nucleus’ shell.Simultaneously, by means of inductive influence of this energy, metal-composed shells are additionally heated.Energy distribution analysis taken by a separately chosen Pyramid, located in different parts of the planet, revealed an unexpected result: certain group of Pyramids serves only as a receiver of Cosmic energy, another group – only as a transmitter using diamond layer as big quantity of lasers. This proved to be very high frequency energy. However, a certain part of this energy is converting into low-frequency one is radiate into open Space.The model of the interaction of the Pyramids and Earth’s nucleus is presented at pic. 1. Willing to find the source of the cosmic energy, the author composed the holograms of the sky and synchronized them with the holograms of the parts of the Earth, containing Pyramids (Egypt, Himalayas, England, Mexico, Sevastopol, Easter Island and Bermuda Islands).Having hologrammically tracked the energy flows, the author revealed that Himalayas and Bermuda Pyramids provide energy exchange of the Earth’s nucleus with Alpha Aurigus (Capella); Mexican and English (Stonehenge) – with Alpha Lyra (Vega); Egyptian, Sevastopol and Easterr  Island – with Alpha Cule (Canopus).Each Star of Northern Celestial Hemisphere controls two groups of Pyramids. One group serves as a receiver, whereas another as a transmitter to the Star. The Stars are located under the 120″ angle in relation to each other, thus, creating electromagnetic momentums, effecting the position of the Earth’s axis, and, probably, its rotation. However, in accordance with the laws of celestial mechanics, one more group of Pyramids should have been existed, in order to get the equality of momentums of the Northern and Southern Earth Hemispheres. According to the mathematical calculation, this group of Pyramids must have been existed in the center of South America. These missing Pyramids have been found in Brasilia. The whole scheme of energy exchange with stars is shown at Pic.2.  In view of the above-mentioned, the following conclusions could be deducted:    – The Pyramids play an important role in control of the Earth’s nucleus, position of the Earth’s axis and the rotation of the Globe. That is why it seems intuitively clear, that is very significant to preserve the entirety of the Pyramids’ structure. The decreased vertical energy exchange Pyramids should be specially treated by the cosmic energy for the sake of vertical conductivity restoration. This work could be performed New Age Masters Restoration of the Pyramids’ direct function could contribute the prolongation of the current civilization and to ease the Transitive collapses.


The author,
assistant technical sciences, professor

Vitaly A. Gokh. academician
 

Сайт управляется системой uCoz

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is teslapyramide.jpg

Principle Tesla:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Tesla-patent-1901-300x206.jpg

Tesla

It has long been known that moving a magnetic field across a wire will generate an electromotive force (EMF), or voltage, along the wire. When this wire is connected in a closed electrical circuit, an electric current, capable of performing work, is driven through this closed circuit by the induced
electromotive force.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is tesla_radiant-energy-1024x302.jpg

Permanent magnet materials are magnetically “hard”. The orientation axis of each is fixed in place within a
rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move.
This constraint aligns the field of ordinary magnets permanently, hence the name “permanent”.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Pyramide_and_electrictry.jpg

The magnets may be formed of any polarised magnetic material. In order of descending effectiveness, the most desirable permanent magnet materials are Neodymium-Iron-Boron (“NIB”), Samarium Cobalt, AlNiCo alloy, or “ceramic” Strontium-Barium or Lead-Ferrite.

Magnetic flux adds together in these zones, where induced magnetic flux (c) aids the input flux (a).
This is the reverse of typical generator action, where induced flux (c) is typically opposing the “input”
flux originating the induction. Since the magnetic interaction is a combination of magnetic flux
opposition and magnetic flux acceleration, there is no longer an overall magnetic braking or total
opposition effect. The braking and opposition is counterbalanced by a simultaneous magnetic acceleration within the core. Since mechanical motion is absent, the equivalent electrical effect ranges
 from idling, or absence of opposition, to a strengthening and overall acceleration of the electrical input signal (within coils 6).

It has also long been known that this resulting electric current causes the closed circuit to become
encircled with a secondary, induced magnetic field, whose polarity opposes the primary magnetic field which first induced the EMF. this magnetic opposition creates mutual repulsion as a moving magnet approaches such a closed circuit, and a mutual attraction as that moving magnet moves away from the closed circuit. Both these actions tend to slow or cause “drag” on the progress of the moving magnet, causing the electric generator to act as a magnetic brake, whose effect is in direct proportion to the amount of electric current produced.

Key to understanding:

All ferromagnetic atoms and “magnetic metals” contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.
In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible.
The orientation of magnetic flux both internal and external to the material, pivots easily.
Such materials are referred to as magnetically “soft”, due to this magnetic flexibility.

The axis of circular current flow in one ferromagnetic atom can direct the axis of magnetism within another ferromagnetic atom, through a process known as “spin exchange”. This gives a soft magnetic material, like raw iron, the useful ability to aim, focus and redirect the magnetic field emitted from a magnetically hard permanent magnet. In the present invention, a permanent magnet’s rigid field is sent into a magnetically flexible “soft” magnetic material. the permanent magnet’s apparent location, observed from points within the magnetically soft material, will effectively move, vibrate, and appear to shift position when the magnetisation of the soft magnetic material is modulated by ancillary means (much like the sun, viewed while underwater, appears to move when the water is agitated). By this mechanism, the motion required for generation of electricity can be synthesised within a soft magnetic material, without requiring physical movement or an applied mechanical force.

The synthesised magnetic motion is produced without either mechanical or electrical resistance.
This synthesised magnetic motion is aided by forces generated in accordance with Lenz’s Law, in order to
produce acceleration of the synthesised magnetic motion, instead of physical “magnetic braking” common to mechanically-actuated electrical generators.

A primary factor determining permanent magnet material composition is the magnetic flux strength of the particular material type. In an embodiment of the invention, these magnets may also be substituted with one or more electromagnets producing the required magnetic flux. In another embodiment of the invention, a superimposed DC current bias can be applied to the output wire to generate the required magnetic flux, replacing or augmenting the permanent magnets.

If you woud like to try there are some who came before you but a few minor changes and it wil possible produce energy. Some where hoaxes put there deliberately to discourage and suppress these activities.

Heaven
History
Sumer/Aliens
Mind control

Attempts and research in free energy devices some successful.

Home grown types.

Patent from Germany and widely used in different secrete Alien/human underground facilities like Dulce.

Comments

  1. Beauty Fashion

    One more important issue is that if you are an elderly person, travel insurance intended for pensioners is something you should make sure you really contemplate. The mature you are, greater at risk you happen to be for making something undesirable happen to you while in foreign countries. If you are certainly not covered by many comprehensive insurance, you could have many serious complications. Thanks for giving your good tips on this website.

  2. Buy Proxies In Bulk

    Hi would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using? I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  3. Beauty Fashion

    An added important issue is that if you are a senior citizen, travel insurance regarding pensioners is something you should really look at. The mature you are, the harder at risk you are for having something negative happen to you while in foreign countries. If you are certainly not covered by some comprehensive insurance coverage, you could have many serious issues. Thanks for giving your suggestions on this website.

  4. Proxy Sale

    Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your site? My blog is in the exact same area of interest as yours and my visitors would truly benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!

  5. Hairstyles

    Helpful information. Lucky me I found your site unintentionally, and I’m stunned why this coincidence didn’t took place earlier! I bookmarked it.

  6. Latest Hairstyles

    I抳e been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i am satisfied to show that I have an incredibly good uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed. I so much certainly will make sure to do not forget this web site and give it a glance on a continuing basis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.