AND RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES?
And there are all kinds of explanations about the why and how of chem-trailing and other interferences on a big scale, but all governments are keeping quiet about them and discourage speculation?
Maybe? Do you believe it?
Right above our heads, in plain sight, powders and aerosols descending from the skies, changing our flora and our fauna by killing it off, perhaps making Earth a planet fit for some other kind of life that requires aluminum to live on?
Trees, plants, seaweed use the CO2 in the air to grow and form/produce carbohydrates and is also our food and animals do need it too. In addition, produce O2 or oxygen which we and these animals use/need. By poisoning this process does has grave consequences and is done on purpose, no question about it?
Or perhaps even creating new kinds of plants, using our existing flora as a basis, plants that will absorb aluminum and contain it for consumption by that new species that intends to replace us?
Even if the governments in the World are keeping a silence of the dead around discussion of Chem trailing and other interferences actively and 24/7, denying that it even exists, that all who claim to see it are psychotics under some sort of mass-hallucination (do photographs lie?), what would we notice, that might give the lie to governmental lying?
Would, say, attempts be proceeding to develop aluminum-resistant plants, perhaps even animals? Yes, such developmental projects are being pushed at high speed right now.
Are these developments to our benefit, or to those intending to replace us? Answer: As we and our present-day plants and animals will definitely be killed off by the aluminum, we certainly are not the beneficiaries of this.
Only if our world governments, becoming daily more intolerant towards those they are robbing of pension, and medical-benefits and even mere decent wages,
acting like we are just a nuisance to some agenda of their own, are under the control of those aliens from Somewhere who are currently Alien-forming Earth, do all these phenomena we are witnessing today make sense.
We are being replaced by something else, and our governments are under the control of those who are doing this and are doing it for them, not for us. Unfortunate, but true.
If we are too dumb to notice what is happening right above our heads, then we deserve to die.
The lowest temperature ever recorded in our registered history was this in Antarctica. The climate is changing and a dynamic process. But there is interference on a big scale and no authority wants to discus nor its influences on what we see/experience?
| Eat your heart out, Al Gore. Being a carbon billionaire is so passé now that we’re in the age of the $100 trillion climate swindle. So, the real question is who (or at least which corporate front) will be the first carbon trillionaire? Will it be a carbon eugenics promoting Rockefeller or a global government promoting Rothschild, or a carbon divesting Saudi government, or one of the shady hedge funds that are spearheading weather derivatives and other Enron-developed financial instruments to try to cash in on the carbon fraud? Source|
Global warming is dead on arrival. We are living in a cooling world because we revolve around a cooling sun, which will reach the height of inactivity in about ten to fifteen years. Many cooling activities are also happening earth side: dramatically increased volcanic activity, continued commercial air traffic (global dimming effect), the loss of ozone in the stratosphere; and because of the geoengineering of the atmosphere to cool the earth even though there is no global warming.
We also have increasing cloud cover and precipitation because of increased cosmic rays touching down on earth, which explains much about the record-breaking snow and cold as well because more sun light that is reflected back to space because of the clouds. Source
There is “no climate emergency” according to over 1,100 scientists and professionals from across the world, led by the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever, who have signed the recently published World Climate Declaration.
The article by the World Climate Declaration (WCD) claiming that “there is no climate emergency” began gaining traction on social media on Thursday 18 August after it was reportedly “scrubbed from the internet” and retrieved by the Wayback Machine as per a report in Euro Weekly News yesterday.
Push, push and push. The never-ending discussion, CO2 does not change the climate on earth, did not so in the past, not now, nor will it in our future.
It is the raw material plants, trees, seaweed, need to grow and produce. Live/life/produce. Simple/basic.
Essential, combined with sunlight and water produces our food and release oxygen which we and our animals need. Currently it is at an all-time low about 0.04% of our air and has never been that low in the history of planet earth. Too low in fact to produce enough food for us/animals resulting in famine. It is free, CO2, Water, Sunlight. But not for long anymore. They want Money, Money and more Money?
Please note: Biden’s Message on Climate Might Not Be the One the World Wants? The summits where developing nations (BRIC +) have spent all week excoriating the US and other industrialized nations for causing climate change and demanding reparations. The Plan developed by Rockefeller and others within the deep State (NWO) and advanced and executed by WEF/EU/and currently US. Also, the creation of BRIC. Factual he owns both and deeply in-dept to his banks. The standard mode like WW2 owning Germany and the US. Because of the winner takes all but also very profitable. The money borrowed is created from thin air or nothing. (Special drawing rights). Part of this plan is to let the bricks win. And colonialism to be destroyed. All to do to make us in the West feel guilty and give up. (Suicide)
That is also the origin of the scam. Bringing extreme left on board in the beginning and pushing the save the world agenda. Sounds good and who would not be willing to go for that? Trouble is that CO2 does not change the climate, but every human worldwide produces it good enough. To bring the rest of the world on board promise large payments and lucrative jobs for the current rulers/family/friends.
Playing Santa and we to pay. They the NWO/Cabal tried a couple of time to finish/complete the scam but failed as result of external complications. Do remember the introduction and push of Lundberg. With an increasing number of heads of state and related waiting for the ships with gold arriving and add to what was expected. To the politicians in the West no problem promising a lot, but you are not bound by it.
They the Cabal/Banks start to buy all industry in Europe working and supplying the world markets and relocating to China/India. Why cheap labor especial EU was there the demands to clean the toxic left over or the industrial waste. In addition, the large numbers of people (Markets). Now have it two ways, low labor cost countries and no real demands in respect of removal of toxins. Netting trillions in extra profits. Now a 100% switch. We the West are responsible for the sorrow state of the World environment and should be punish/Pay.
The World upside down. Now, in addition, the NWO/WEF or globalist are telling the developing countries that they should in addition demand compensation as well and more specific now CHINA. Not that they need too because the main participants/organizers are recruited from extreme left/collectivists. Stood out during their education in Universities of the West and integrated by the NWO/Cabal specific. Also, brain washed.
That is why they have been successful in using our education system to teach us that we the people in the West are guilty for any and everything that is going on in the world and not good. Nothing to do with us but that is what we did learn/hear in schools after WW2 and our history changed/updated.
Next unite them, arm them and start moving. By removing our industrial base in the past, we are no longer really able to produce the needed for defense other than going nuclear and with high speed.
Socking the fact that CO2 is the raw material plants need to produce and the current amount with the air already too low to produce enough. Should at least be double the current level being 0.04 and is really nothing. The planners and pushers of the great reset do know this and love it. Business who grows vegetables in glasshouses return the combusted air from the heaters back when used into the glasshouses to increase growth. The higher the CO2 content the higher the growth/yield. Nothing new and well known. However, what these extremists are pushing for is the opposite and lower the CO2 in the air and decrease growth/yield worldwide/famine.
Who within his right mind would do such a thing and only possible because they own/control the main media. If I dear write about it for example a note will be attached stating that the temperatures are changing. Everything is part of a dynamic process. Even when I did intend school 70 years ago the teachers would tell us kids that at one time Greenland was subtropical. We do know that our poles do not stay in one place. We know that the electrical/magnetically charges flip at certain period in time. I did read that in Antarctica the lowest temperature ever measured was recorded. One part of Antartica is melting and the opposite site is growing. I love water and the sea (Ocean) and build a house on a strand at a tidal inlet 50 years ago. (Atlantic) When I did was warned about possible flooding. I never did, still possible depending on wind and the moon but the sea-level did rise a little but not much in all that time. That makes it easy for me.
The Davos group/WEF are using the media which are under their control pushing this agenda and knowing that it will result in a great famine and many people/animals will pass. (Depopulation) Please wake-up before it is too late?
Enslavement for the so-called greater good. Forgot to inform you much earlier. The Carbon footprint because it catches all humans, every single life on earth but also the animal. So, if you wonder what is happening, nothing by accident nor nature but planned and pushed by the Cabal. And most of our elected politicians decided to join the party.
Behind all of it is an attempt by the WEF/Cabal too monetize everything and control it like they do now with oil and gas. Unfortunately, CO2 is the raw material plants need to grow/produce and on a historic low leading to famine?
To low should be between 0.08 and 0.10 to feed the current population/animals. And transparent and open for discussion instead of feeding restricted and manipulated info.
The Cabal/FEW are unsaturable. Not differ much of the EU/fact he same other than by name. Working in tandem and most elected member in Brussels are also WEF members and Agenda. (Proper?)
Started some time ago and when the investor/friend Soro talk about it he most of the time talked about the War on The Poor and they were winning. At least a dozen times during interviews given.
Using small lock-steps.
End of the story it is all about money, money, big money and you and I will be forced to pay the bill.
Push, push like was and still is the case with the so-called Covid pandemic.
The latest from COP27.
Despite the fact that the scientific statements proposed by Kerry and the First Movers Coalition are proven false, Kerry said “President Biden is more determined than ever to continue” with the radical green agenda.
NEWS agenda 201
John Kerry says climate change strategy will be rolled out like COVID vaccines
The WEF-U.S. State Department’s ‘First Movers Coalition’ is convinced that rising global temperatures will cause international deaths to rise.
However, this is in contradiction to the most up to date research.
Last year, climate science expert Bjorn Lomborg noted that nearly half a million people died from “storms, floods, droughts, wildfires and extreme temperatures” per year a century ago while in 2020 just 14,000 died in similar events.
“That’s almost 99% less than the death toll a century ago,” he wrote. “The global population has quadrupled since then, so this is an even bigger drop than it looks.”
Not that it matters. Generating Fear, censorship and push, push.
During a COP27 panel on Tuesday, John Kerry said that the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “First Movers Coalition” climate initiative has been modeled from COVID vaccine rollouts.
COP27 is an annual climate change conference held by the UN and features organizations such as the WEF as well as statesmen and businessmen from governments and corporations.
Appearing alongside WEF president Børge Brende and various corporate executives, U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry urged the private sector to merge with the public sector in order to stop an allegedly catastrophic climate disaster that he believes is coming.
In his speech, he said, “We have an enormous challenge before us to bring to scale new technologies and to harness the deeply capable capacity of private sector entrepreneurs in order to bring them to the table because without it, no government has enough money … we need everybody behind this.”
The First Movers Coalition is the result of a partnership between the U.S. State Department and the WEF, and was established before last year’s COP26 conference.
The essence of the endeavor is to lure big companies into committing to “green” initiatives by attaching loads of public funding in order to take away the risk of losing any money on behalf of the corporation.
Kerry told the attendees at the panel that the initiative sought seeks to harness the same infrastructure that rolled out COVID jabs where collaboration between corporations and the state was commonplace.
Kerry said that he believes the state-corporation collaboration to roll out COVID jabs was necessary because “human life was so at risk.” And he believes the same type of collaboration is necessary now because of “the challenges of the global climate crisis.”
The WEF-U.S. State Department initiative is convinced that rising global temperatures will cause international deaths to rise.
Also proven to truth but who cares. The eminent take-over and control by big business is all that matter.
Despite the fact that the scientific statements proposed by Kerry and the First Movers Coalition are proven false, Kerry said “President Biden is more determined than ever to continue” with the radical green agenda.
Rich countries must spend $2 trillion per year for ‘climate justice’: UN report
Leaders at the COP27 climate summit in Egypt demanded a ‘fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty’ be signed, despite many of them having jetted in from around the world.
Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore speaks vat the COP27 climate conference on November 9, 2022, in Sharm El-Sheikh, EgyptPhoto by Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Sat Nov 12, 2022 – 12:59 pm EST
Listen to this article
0:00 / 4:111X
SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt (LifeSiteNews) — A United Nations report has called for wealthy nations to “invest” over $2 trillion in developing countries by 2030 to address the alleged climate crisis.
The “Finance for Climate Action” report, developed in a partnership between Egypt and the U.K. – the respective hosts of the COP27 and COP26 climate summits –was released on Tuesday. It calls for a “major, rapid and sustained investment push … to drive a strong and sustainable recovery out of current and recent crises, transform economic growth, and to deliver on shared development and climate goals.”
This is unlikely to be applauded by the 41% of climate scientists who are willing to admit that they don’t believe that there is a climate crisis.
According to the report, the goal of limiting global average temperature rises to 1.5 Celsius, set forward in the pro-abortion Paris Climate Agreement, can be achieved only through “$1 trillion per year in external finance” before 2030, to be donated to “emerging markets and developing countries” by “developed countries.” Around $1.4 trillion is to be raised domestically by scaling back on fossil-fuel subsidies and implementing a “carbon tax,” the report suggested.
Despite contributing more than any other nation to global carbon emissions, China was explicitly excluded from the requirement to fund the climate action initiative.
The 94-page analysis focused on “mitigation” and “adaptation,” with the former calling for a global shift from fossil-fuel usage and the latter promoting infrastructure for supposed climate change-induced disasters to be provided at the expense of the fossil fuel industry.
According to a report in France24, Nicholas Stern, an economist and one of the report’s co-authors, stated that achieving the Paris climate goals was not driven merely by self-interest, but also “justice.”
— Article continues below Petition —
SIGN: Pope Francis must revoke nomination of pro-abortion atheist to Pontifical Academy for Life
8466 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 9000!
Add your signature:
Show Petition TextCountry…USACanadaAaland IslandsAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuracaoCyprusCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinePanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarRepublic of KosovoReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthelemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint MartinSaint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan Mayen IslandsSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican CityVenezuelaVietnamVirgin Islands (British)Virgin Islands (U.S.)Wallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweNot Collected
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues. Sign this Petition
“Rich countries should recognise that it is in their vital self-interest – as well as a matter of justice given the severe impacts caused by their high levels of current and past emissions – to invest in climate action in emerging market and developing countries.”
The report itself also claims that “[d]eveloped countries have a crucial responsibility from the standpoint of climate justice, given historical responsibilities and the interrelationship with poverty reduction.”
The authors suggested that providing financial assistance to poor countries is “critical… to support action on restoring land and nature, and for protecting against and responding to the loss and damage due to climate change impacts.”
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
Despite many having themselves jetted in, leaders at the COP27 conference in Egypt called for a “fossil fuels non-proliferation treaty.” Tuvalu Prime Minister Kausea Natano declared that “[I]t’s getting too hot, and there is very [little] time to slow and reverse the increasing temperature. Therefore, it is essential to prioritize fast-acting strategies.”
However, in an appearance on Fox News last month, aerospace engineer and former climate alarmist Tom Harris decried the push to curtail carbon emissions as part of an apparent climate saving agenda, calling the international movement a “scam.”
Harris argued that climate modelling is far from “settled science,” stating instead that “it’s a very immature science.”
“In fact, we don’t even know whether it’s going to warm or cool in the future,” he said. “Various people who study the sun… show that we’re headed into a great solar minimum around 2060, and that we’ll see gradual cooling over the next few decades.”
“So the bottom line is, we have no clue what’s going to really happen, so the only sensible approach is to get ready for it, to make our infrastructure harder, to use solid, dependable sources of energy like coal… and not to turn off our solid, reliable energy sources for flimsy wind and solar power,” Harris concluded.
‘Scam’: Former climate change alarmist says agenda has ‘no foundation’
‘So the bottom line is, we have no clue what’s going to really happen, so the only sensible approach is to… use solid, dependable sources of energy like coal… and not to turn off our solid, reliable energy sources for flimsy wind and solar power.’
Aerospace engineer Tom HarrisBridge City News / YouTube
Thu Oct 20, 2022 – 12:30 pm EDT
Listen to this article
0:00 / 6:461X
(LifeSiteNews) — A former climate alarmist appeared on Laura Ingraham’s FOX News program las week, calling climate alarmism, the belief that the world will suffer catastrophically as a result of man-made climate change or global warming, a “scam.”
Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition, an organization that seeks to promote a better understanding of climate science, told Ingraham that contrary to the mainstream position, there is not an impending climate crisis.
“I was originally an aerospace engineer,” Harris began, “and I would give speeches, and I wrote articles. I wrote one in the Ottawa Citizen about comparative climatology, how studying the planets helps us understand the earth better. And I used the example of the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus. I said ‘This could happen on the earth, if we don’t reduce carbon dioxide!’”
“A local professor at Carleton University, a professor of geology, he liked my article so much he used it in his course on climate change,” Harris continued. “But he said to the students, ‘But that part about Venus is wrong. What happened on Venus cannot physically happen on earth,’ and he explained why.”
Harris claimed that the professor took him to his lab and showed him his findings, as well as those of other scientists, recounting “At times, [carbon dioxide] was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions. So it was all over the board. So I started wondering, ‘Well, maybe he’s right.’”
Harris also stated that the professor introduced him to people that showed him that thousands of scientists who disagree with the so-called “climate consensus,” shattering the proposition that most scientists believe in global warming.
Harris then brought out a book that dismantles the claims of thousands of articles about the climate crisis, showing that “there is no foundation” to the proposition.
“Here’s a book actually that illustrates that, it’s called Climate Change Reconsidered, and this is on climatechangereconsidered.org,” Harris said. “There are thousands of references here which talk about the fact that there is no foundation to the climate scam. It’s all based on models that don’t work.”
When asked by Ingraham if the science around climate and climate change was “settled science,” Harris answered in the negative.
“No,” Harris said. “In fact, it’s a very immature science. In fact, we don’t even know whether its going to warm or cool in the future. Various people who study the sun … they show that we’re headed into a great solar minimum around 2060, and that we’ll see gradual cooling over the next few decades.”
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
“So the bottom line is, we have no clue what’s going to really happen, so the only sensible approach is to get ready for it, to make our infrastructure harder, to use solid, dependable sources of energy like coal … and not to turn off our solid, reliable energy sources for flimsy wind and solar power,” Harris concluded.
Harris’ comments come as the World Economic Forum (WEF) has proposed climate protocols similar to the COVID lockdowns to help “alleviate” stresses caused by “climate change.”
In the WEF report, titled ‘My Carbon’: An approach for inclusive and sustainable cities, the authors suggested that implementing systems to track and restrict personal carbon usage has had “limited success due to a lack of social acceptance, political resistance, and a lack of awareness and fair mechanism for tracking ‘My Carbon’ emissions,” but that the response to the COVID lockdowns created an environment in which that “lack of social acceptance and political resistance” may be overcome.
“A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world,” the report stated. “There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.”
Speaking to LifeSiteNews last month, Marc Morano, author of The Great Reset: Global Elites and the Permanent Lockdown, warned that lockdowns, restrictions, and even planned economic collapse are all part of the “climate” agenda.
“The COVID lockdowns were literally a version of what they’ve called for for decades in the climate movement,” Morano said. “I attend every United Nations climate summit, and I’m going to the one in Egypt this year…and what these summits call for…is the ‘degrowth movement,’ or ‘planned recessions’ … to fight global warming. And what that means is the government imposes slower economic growth or forces a recession to lower emissions.”
“If you live under authoritarianism, if you live under government control over every aspect of your life, you’re solving viruses, you’re solving climate…You’re also solving inequity, you’re also solving transgenderism, whatever the wokeism is,” Morano continued.
“The point is they want control, and they’ll do whatever they have, whether it’s a virus, whether it’s climate, you name it, they want to invoke emergency powers. That’s really what this is about. Emergency powers to bypass democracy.”
The WEF has long advocated for a “hard shift” away from conventional fuels in favor of green energy, as part of its “Great Reset” agenda, which would obliterate the fossil fuel industry, destroy reliable access to electricity, implement a “universal basic income,” and replace traditional energy industry jobs with guaranteed government positions protected by unions, LifeSiteNews previously reported.
Over the summer, the WEF argued that pushing forward an “clean energy transition,” partly by hiking up already record-breaking gas prices, would be necessary for both saving democracy and staving off a so-called environmental catastrophe.
U.S. President Joe Biden, who has presided over skyrocketing inflation and historically high gas prices, drew backlash in May when he suggested that the high cost of fuel was part of an “incredible transition.”
Harris is not the only scientist that has come out against the climate agenda. Last year, Pat Moore, founder and former president of Greenpeace, published a book called Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom, in which he argued against climate alarmism, claiming that global warming is not a threat to the planet, going as far as positing that the earth is currently experiencing an ice age.
Environmental alarmism is nothing but a big lie from the ‘climate industrial complex’
Geologist Gregory Wrightstone makes a massively compelling case that pretty much everything we have been told about so-called climate change is the opposite of the truth.
Geologist and author Gregory WrightstoneEpoch Times / Rumble
Thu Oct 20, 2022 – 8:49 pm EDT
Listen to this article
0:00 / 5:241X
(LifeSiteNews) — It may come as a shock, but I will venture to say that everything you have been told about so-called climate change is a lie.
For the truth on the matter, look no further than the recent Epoch Times interview with Gregory Wrightstone, a geologist and author of the bestselling book, Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know. He is a senior fellow at the Cornwall Alliance and is an advisory board member of the Heartland Institute.
In the interview, Wrightstone makes a massively compelling case that pretty much everything we have been told about so-called climate change is the opposite of the truth.
I know, I know… governments and mega-corporations have proven themselves to be so trustworthy since 2020.
In all seriousness, in my experience, the issue of climate change is one of the most profoundly entrenched issues into the consciousness of liberals and conservatives alike.
We have been brought up for generations to venerate the environment, recycling, and supposedly renewable energies. And, because of our good-natured love for nature, we don’t see anything wrong with making milk-carton planters or switching to reusable coffee mugs.
It is understandable, as there is nothing virtuous about being wasteful, so we at least in part embrace the “green” revolution as a way of keeping up with the times.
However, it is time to take the “green pill” and see the truth about environmental issues.
Red pill, green pill
Maybe you have already taken the “red pill,” which is to say you have swallowed the hard truth that the institutions and organizations you were brought up to trust were in fact lying to you.
This is not to say does that every institution was lying every time, but it is definitely the case that you have been told more lies that you would like to admit. However, you took that red pill and you began to see through all the lies and disorder.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
That being said, there are lies that are so deep, lies that are so pervasive that we just don’t see through them, for a variety of reasons.
For one, it is a bit tiring to constantly be “red-pilling” yourself on this or that topic. Learning new things is hard and embracing completely new paradigms is a lot of work.
But, then comes the moment when the paradigm is shoved down your throat and you cannot ignore it any longer. For many, the COVID hysteria presented an opportunity to be red-pilled on the, well, companies and governments who we are supposed to trust about what pills to take.
Presently, we are facing a paradigm of environmental tyranny fueled – pun intended – by what Wrightstone calls the “climate industrial complex.”
The goal of the adherents to this complex is an “end game” of “zero fossil fuels.”
He believes that the governmental and corporate powers-that-be are so attached to climate zealotry that “they are intentionally inflating energy costs” so that consumers will see supposed “green energy” as a viable option.
Although he doesn’t believe climate lockdowns are likely, he did say that he thinks they are a desirable outcome by the “fringe” of the environmental movement, and that we shouldn’t discount them altogether.
The carbon lie
The crux of the whole green-paradigm is the insistence that too much carbon – whatever that means – is the cause of warming. However, Wrightstone said this is patently false.
For one, he said that carbon (co2) is in reality a “hugely beneficial molecule” and that the presence of more co2 has led to better crop yields and a “greening” of the world.
One such benefit of more co2, he said, is that “more co2 means less water is needed for crops.”
To dispel the myth that carbon is the cause of warming, he points to historical periods of warming that occurred long before the industrial revolution.
“They were growing barley in Greenland,” he said. “You can’t grow that now.”
To put this in perspective, the climate of present-day Greenland is more like the most northern regions of Canada and Russia than a place with a long enough growing season for such a robust crop.
In addition, Wrightstone stated that in Northern England “the Romans were growing citrus.”
The only places you can expect to grow citrus fruits in Europe today are the most southern regions of the Mediterranean nations that are known for blisteringly hot summers and mild winters.
Fear the cold, welcome the warm
Admittedly, one of the reasons I have largely rejected the “global warming” narrative is because as a Canadian I view cold temperatures as a bit of a badge of honor.
However, Wrightstone said we should “fear the cold and welcome the warm.”
He added that historically when a warming period would end, civilizations would basically collapse due to lack of crop yield and a rise in disease. We are in a much better position today with technology to withstand a cooling, but in his opinion, warming is our friend.
I would have to agree, and I would also have to believe – according to his statements – that there were periods where it was much warmer in the past, and the human race was better off for it.
Again, as much as I love to embrace the Canadian winter, I would have to admit that if things were to warm up like they had in other golden ages of civilization, there would be great benefits, especially in the expansion of habitable areas of a frozen nation like mine.
As a consolation, we could still have our hockey rinks due to modern refrigeration techniques. Sounds like the best of both worlds to me.
Kennedy Hall is an Ontario based journalist for LifeSiteNews. He is married with children and has a deep love for literature and political philosophy. He is the author of Terror of Demons: Reclaiming Traditional Catholic Masculinity, a non-fiction released by TAN books, and Lockdown with the Devil, a fiction released by Our Lady of Victory Press. He writes frequently for Crisis Magazine, Catholic Family News, and is on the editorial board at OnePeterFive.
Open Letter to Global Leaders assembled at COP27 in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt global climate intelligence group.
Open Letter to Global Leaders assembled at COP27 in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt
Amsterdam, November 1, 2022
By the year 2030, historians will wonder with amazement how it could happen that the UN in previous decades had proposed far-reaching climate-related measures that totally failed to arrest global warming, but instead would have the unintended consequence of an unprecedented negative impact on the world’s prosperity and well-being.
They will wonder why many people at that time unquestioningly believed in an “existential climate crisis.” That crisis narrative was based on outdated “over-heated” computer models, in turn widely supported by mainstream media. They will consider it beyond belief that a senior UN official in September 2022 audaciously declared that “we own the science, and we think the world should know it and the (social media) platforms also.”
Indeed, why did the UN and IPCC ignore Clintel letters (the most recent in October 2021), clearly pointing out serious scientific flaws in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report? Why did IPCC refuse any open debate on these flaws? Does the UN not realize that Clintel’s global network now embodies greater objective scientific knowledge than exists within IPCC?
They will wonder why the world did not loudly protest the spread of the superstition that climate science was fully understood (“The Science is Settled”, the UN and politicians declared). That superstition regrettably led to legislation on totally unnecessary social engineering measures with net-zero CO2 targets (“mitigation”).
Indeed, why didn’t the UN then want to let the world see that the mitigation measures they proposed were scientifically nonsensical, technically unfeasible, economically unaffordable and, ultimately, socially unacceptable?
And why did they not admit that mitigation even at a global scale – as already proven in the pandemic of 2020 – would have imperceptible effect on climate?
And why did they also not want the world to know about the fact that CO2 is an essential building block for life on earth? More CO2 is indispensable in making the earth greener. Looking at all the facts, more CO2 is much more likely to bring net benefits than net harm!
They will also wonder why an extremely expensive transition to intermittent renewables was pursued without realizing that the transition would lead to major economic problems.
Indeed, why didn’t people then recognize that reliable energy supply with solar panels and wind turbines was technically impossible without the future availability of affordable large-scale electrical energy storage?
And why then didn’t people recognize that mass generation of solar and wind energy would create a serious shortage on materials such as copper and neodymium.
And why then were conventional fossil fuel power plants banned, particularly in Africa, while there was as yet no affordable and reliable alternative? Much of the serious energy crisis was erroneously blamed on the war in Ukraine; the reality however was that world leaders had not promoted investment in conventional reliable power generation to maintain economic well-being and societal stability.
Fortunately, today it is not yet 2030 and we still have time to make the necessary changes. What is needed to make that happen?
Here are three suggestions for you, the global political leaders:
- Depoliticize climate science, discarding computer models that do not match reality, focusing instead on real-world climate observations and the latest climate science, listening carefully to objective interventions from independent experts.
- Change climate policy from the senseless mitigation approach to the successful adaptation method. Mitigation is prohibitively expensive and has never saved a single human life and will do very little to alter an ever-changing climate. Adaptation, on the other hand, is affordable, can be precisely focused and has already saved millions of lives. Adaptation is without a doubt the way to go in climate policy.
- Invest in extending and replenishing the world’s oil & gas reserves. Be realistic, the world will still need oil and gas for several decades. In parallel, go full steam ahead with developing nuclear power, the energy source of the future.
Dear Excellencies, you are meeting at COP27 in Egypt in early November, apparently to promote continuation of failed global climate policy. It would be a crime against the African people to require them to base their energy system on intermittent wind and solar power. After all, that would push the more than 1.3 billion people there further into poverty. Economic development cannot happen without affordable and reliable energy supplies.
Africa must make full use of affordable indigenous fossil fuels for power generation, with a future plan for a network of modern nuclear power plants. With plenty of affordable energy, the supply of clean drinking water can also be guaranteed.
Next, full efforts should be made to apply adaptation technology, especially for growing tailor-made crops (“precision farming”) and for securing against extreme weather (“risk minimization”). Those, as you well know, are the real and urgent needs of Africa.
The above points are the messages from Clintel to all of the global political leaders arriving in their private jets to attend the COP27 meeting in the luxury resort of Sharm El-Sheikh. We beg you, our political leaders, to be conscientious of the daily realities of grinding poverty of the forgotten people living on the African continent in the shadow of your flightpath.
On behalf of the Clintel ambassadors,
President of Clintel
Download the letter in pdf