Will democracy control capitalism or will capitalism control democracy? Two of our founding fathers in the US, Jefferson and Hamilton were the represent the two sides of the coin in this tension, and awareness of this dynamic conflict was built into our US constitution.
The resulting Democracy would in have in theory, through democratic representation, have the power to elect leaders and pass laws, prevent the development of monopolist tendencies but did not do so. Joined the Globalist and we the electorate betrayed or sold.
Alien intervention.
The Intervention is of two kinds. There are resource explorers, which nearly always represent one race, operating with great freedom and impunity, which are clients of larger powers. Sometimes, they are clients of independent trading networks that are engaged in illegal trade. Those resource explorers who have been in your world and who are in your world today represent members of this group.
Then there are Collectives, who are multi-racial, hierarchical and very well organized. Their worker classes are bred for specific purposes, and they are involved in collective breeding, which is a practice not all advanced races are engaged in. The Collectives seek a more permanent residence in this world. They seek it as a world that either they or their clients could own and govern from afar, with human assistance.
Dulce New Mexico and other underground research facilities.
That is why such great care has been taken to study human psychology, human physiology and your reproductive process, as well as the biological hazards that exist on Earth. That is one of the reasons that plant samples have been taken and the world has been observed for such a very long time.
Under need are some important stake holders part of this monopoly; are-Rothschild family-Du Pont family-Rockefeller family-Carnegie family-Orsini Family-American Bush family-British Royal family. Behind much of the events and the decisions are several foundations causing and ferment chaos in our world; the world Bill and Melinda Gates foundation Soros Open Society foundation Clinton foundation These foundations are instrumental for geopolitical destabilization. Chaos which helps & good for business and power acquisition.
It is perhaps surprising for you to realize that an advanced technological race would have difficulty adapting to your world, believing that their science and medical technology would have overcome the difficulties involved here.
But, alas, so great are these difficulties that there is no race who has evolved in sterile or near sterile environments that could easily withstand the biological agents that exist here. Even the illnesses of your animals could affect them. So great is this hazard that in recent history few races have attempted colonization of this world.
But now the Collectives see an advantage, for humanity has built networks that they can use—worldwide communications, worldwide resource extraction and a sufficient level of technology that can, at a basic level, interface with what they use and rely upon.
Our so-called or self-appointed elite
All of this has come about with little more than a whimper from an oblivious American populace largely
comprised of nonreaders and television and internet zombies, but we have been warned about such an ominous future in novels and movies for years.
Globalist tactics and the desired outcomes. The creation of the digital prison by the Cabal ( Banks, Globalists,
freemasons and all wedded with the alien forces/connect.
The globalist methodology/trick is to lower the hammer upon an individual or group who is despised by the general
population, which elicits the “we didn’t need their viewpoint, anyway” response. But the ordinary people unable to look through/background being.
Such people do not realize that what is being set up is just legal precedence, so while thought-crime laws of today are brought against someone who might be seen as despicable by the mass population, tomorrow, these same laws can be used against anyone else – all because legal precedence has been established.
Today, while these thought-crime laws can be exercised against so-called ‘terrorists,’ tomorrow, they can and will be used against you or I, just changing the definition and has been the case during the Covid farce. Only 6% of the population in Africa got vaccinated and no real problems/lives/cost. Used to cause widespread upheaval and resulted in the Governments borrowing enormous amount of money which they created out of thin air.
Now is it the turn with the so-called hate-crimes legislation meaning introducing the censoring of the Internet.
To stop any deviation of the so-called government narrative/science and the globalist fomented interest to stop any and immediately halt to all antigovernmental polemics, replacing them with an Internet that has been ‘wiped-clean’.
This is what true patriotism is all about – and not fear-based enflamed nationalism by placing a red, white,
and blue ribbon sticker on my car, as can now be seen on about every fifth car on the roads of this endangered nation.
The push by our Public Health Elite, trying to turn our society into a Collectivist/monopolist one and centralized and total control by the WHO.
Destruction by this public health elite is calling for what would require to reject the cultural values on
bodily integrity/control, way of lives, believes, traditions and right on life.
How can somebody really suggest that our bodies and life belong to the State/greater good and change it according to changes in the definitions. The definition about what is and was a vaccination? Cheap trick.
In name of the greater goods and of so-called free will, children, body treatment/ownership, life.
Bypassing of believes and governmental structure outlined in the hard fought for Constitution, which provides badly needed decentralized checks and balances on political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights that limit the power of government.
Not even be bothered by explaining, allowing comments, public and trying to create understanding/highlighting the benefits for the people involved/consent and giving a change to vote on.
The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability.
That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of America “reorient” toward a collectivist
society, which would require disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal government
in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course — has the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their children. We all known an dare told what did happen in WWII in Germany and already forgotten and not to talk what did happen in the so-called soviet-union.
Incredibly, as the various nascent technologies employed and shared by the government and corporations
alike—facial recognition, iris scanners, massive databases, behavior prediction software, and so on—are
incorporated into a complex, interwoven cyber network aimed at tracking our movements, predicting our
thoughts and controlling our behavior, Spielberg’s unnerving vision of the future is fast becoming our reality.
Both worlds — our present-day reality and Spielberg’s celluloid vision of the future—are characterized by
widespread surveillance, behavior prediction technologies, data mining, fusion centers, driverless cars,
voice-controlled homes, facial recognition systems, cybugs and drones, and predictive policing (pre-crime) aimed at capturing would-be criminals before they can do any damage.
Surveillance cameras are everywhere. Government agents listen in on our telephone calls and read our emails.
Political correctness — a philosophy that discourages diversity — has become a guiding principle of modern society.
The courts have shredded the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
In fact, SWAT teams battering down doors without search warrants and FBI agents acting as a secret police that investigate dissenting citizens are common occurrences in contemporary America.
We are increasingly ruled by multi-corporations wedded to the police state. Much of the population is either hooked on illegal drugs or ones prescribed by doctors. And bodily privacy and integrity has been utterly eviscerated by a prevailing view that Americans have no rights over what happens to their bodies during an encounter with government officials, who are allowed to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.
Motivation
Members/ex-members, great reset
The NWO/FREEMASONS/WEF
Have over time captured any function of importance in the US/EU/BRIC taken and a member/agenda placed there. They are now in control of all of the most important position and going to use it to establish the so desired one world, one party government. Part of the plan is also setting the BRIC’s against the West and make sure they will win. For most of us it does not make sense but they the banks own both and the winner takes all. Same in WW2 where they supported Hitler Germany and the US.
Money wise are the profits shy high but for the owners of the bank not that important. The banks create money out of nothing and has no real value. It is the Freemasons/alien connect that matters (33+) and also a big bonus if they manage to decimate the population. They and their families will get rejuvenated, filthy rich and allowed to travel between the stars. An offer the old man/women who have grabbed control of Earth/resources could not refuse.
The Aliens they have an agreement with is the Anunnaki and have already positioned themselves on Earth and Mars also known as Draco.
Origin.
Aldebaran.
11/02/22
•It’s becoming ever clearer that the major, most influential health authorities around the world are now still blatantly lying to the public, given the current status of scientific and medical information.
3 Reasons the Official COVID Narrative Is Falling Apart
It’s becoming ever clearer that the major, most influential health authorities around the world are now blatantly lying to the public, given the current status of scientific and medical information.
By
Alliance for Natural Health International
Link copied
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
By Rob Verkerk, Ph.D.
It’s becoming ever more clear that the major, most influential health authorities around the world are now blatantly lying to the public, given the current status of scientific and medical information.
Why do I say this?
The answer is simple: because the most influential health authorities are communicating to the public, both in words and in actions, the view that COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective” when the totality of available evidence suggests otherwise.
Let me explain.
Shouting from the webpage of what is the world’s largest “health system,” the U.K.’s National Health Service, is the statement below, in bold text, declaring the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 “vaccines.”
The following screengrab was taken Oct. 27:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, like so many others, parrots the same information, using bold text for emphasis in the new, lockstep tradition.
The following screengrab was also taken Oct. 27:
It is widely acknowledged that the proportion of proven cases of injury from COVID-19 vaccines is currently very small compared with the total number of doses administered. But this metric is not sufficient to declare a product as safe.
After all, society seems quite happy to deem a children’s toy unsafe even if there is just a theoretical risk of injury — let alone a demonstrated one that has led to death or permanent injury.
The Oxford Dictionary tells us that a product that is safe is one that is “free from hurt or damage.” The Cambridge Dictionary offers a similar meaning: “not in danger or likely to be harmed.” Obviously, there are some harms that are inevitable and would be readily accepted by most who were being offered an injectable medicine, even saline.
These minor harms include common reactions caused by the breach of the skin by the hypodermic needle or even the risk of fainting from “needle phobia.” Then there are nocebo responses that might include headache or fatigue.
But that’s not what we’re talking about here. What’s much more relevant is the rapidly building evidence base that shows substantial differences in severe reactions between injecting a placebo and the real thing.
Sadly and to confuse the wider picture — quite probably deliberately — some of the clinical trials have not been conducted with saline controls, but rather with other vaccines or with mixtures of adjuvants.
This aside, let’s look at two pieces of relatively recent evidence from available data that any court would likely find hard to ignore, that demonstrate the COVID-19 “vaccines” should not and cannot be regarded as safe based on clear-cut differences between treatment and placebo arm results.
Study 1: Haas et al., Journal of the American Medical Association (January 2022)
The first is a comprehensive meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials published in January this year in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association.
The study was led by Julia Haas from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and among the 8 author-strong team was senior author, Ted Kaptchuk, from Harvard Medical School. This is not a marginalized journal, nor a marginalized or discredited authorship.
The findings show a clear and pronounced, statistically significant elevation in severity and number of adverse events in those receiving the COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA, adenoviral vector and protein subunit types), compared with those receiving controls — especially after the second of two doses included in the trials.
That’s it — it should be GAME OVER for any claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe.”
A second study in a major high-impact journal should make it not just GAME OVER but a SLAM DUNK. Turns out there is at least one. In fact, there are many more; I have simply been selective in providing two composite studies (meta-analyses) that in turn include many other studies.
Study 2: Fraiman et al., Vaccine (September 2022)
The authorship of the second study I’ve selected is equally star-studded, including leading researchers from UCLA, Stanford and the University of Maryland, the latter including as its senior (last) author, Peter Doshi, also a senior editor at The BMJ.
What these authors did was painfully tease apart available data from the phase 3 trials that Pfizer and Moderna used to gain their emergency use authorizations (EUAs).
The authors found a consistent trend for significantly greater risks for serious adverse events in the COVID-19 “vaccine” arms compared with placebos, the risk ratios being between 1.36 and 1.57 times greater in the “vaccine” arms for those adverse events defined as being of “special interest.”
These include criteria developed specifically for COVID-19 vaccines by the Brighton Collaboration, and have been agreed upon by the World Health Organization.
The common clotting and heart health issues we see around us today were actually concealed in the data reviewed by the likes of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the European Medicines Agency at the time the EUAs were issued.
They were just ignored by the regulators. That includes the coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries and the myocarditis/pericarditis issues that all jumped off the journal pages.
Joseph Fraiman and colleagues, the authors of the study, had difficulty getting to the bottom of the data in these trials given that both Pfizer and Moderna kept protocols secret and failed to make public individual participant data.
They decided to publish the letter they sent to Albert Bourla and Stéphane Bancel, the respective CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, in a Rapid Response to The BMJ in August, raising their concerns over non-transparency. We drew attention to this major problem in 2020, here and here.
Damning stuff — yet not even a squeak from the vaccine confidence brigade. Punch in (as I just have) “Doshi” in the search bar of The Vaccine Confidence Project and you’ll find zero hits.
Then follow this by plugging in “Offit,” as in Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, also a long-term vaccine protagonist, albeit one who has been voicing caution over COVID-19 vaccines to healthy youngsters.
You’ll find multiple pages of hits when you use Offit’s name. Have they not worked out that it’s this kind of illogic and imbalance that adds to our lack of confidence?
What was concealed from view in the Phase 3 trials, is the disturbing picture of the spectrum of neurological injury that we are now witnessing from the real-world, population-wide roll-out that appears to be linked to COVID-19 vaccines, albeit not commonly, but predictably uncommonly.
Then there are suggestions of increasing cancer incidence, this inevitably clouded by cancer cases among those who didn’t receive standard care during the lockdowns as well as emerging evidence of natural killer and T cell exhaustion following repeat COVID-19 “vaccination.”
Even more challenging will be deconstruction of the long-term complications caused by this new technology that will inevitably be delayed in time post-vaccination and become ever more difficult to unwrap as people get exposed to more shots while the virus continues to circulate and infect people.
High on the watch list are fertility, autoimmune conditions and the smorgasbord of chronic, degenerative diseases associated with aging populations, especially in industrialized countries.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/embed/defender-sms-reminders-v2
Are COVID ‘vaccines’ unavoidably unsafe?
U.S. courts established some 40 years ago (e.g., here and here) that traditional vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The precedent set the scene for vaccine makers to seek indemnity from governments, which would then make the vaccine makers immune from prosecution in the event of no-fault (i.e., non-negligent) injury.
Compensation would then be available in cases where causation of vaccine injury could be proven. That was the theory.
Those of us who have been aware of these issues for many years know just how difficult it is to prove causation.
But those who know it even better are the vaccine injured themselves as they often spend years, at huge personal cost, attempting to work their way on behalf of loved ones through the compensation schemes in different countries.
More often than not they’re spat out of the process and left to contend with life-changing injuries without any state support.
Disturbingly, given that so many of us have now been exposed to the virus, it’s also easy for authorities to try disguising COVID-19 “vaccine” harms under the general HEADING of “long COVID.”
In the U.K. alone, the Office for National Statistics estimates that as of Sept. 3, 2.3 million people are “living in private households who are experiencing self-reported long COVID symptoms.”
Aside from the issue of conflating “vaccine” and virus-induced harms, the current data reported even by official sources are pointing to an emerging problem of an unprecedented scale.
Official data associated with COVID-19 shots in the USA, as reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as summarized on OpenVAERS.com, currently reveals:
- 59,127 permanently disabled
- 34,492 life-threatening injuries
- 31,569 deaths
- 53,302 reported cases of myocarditis/pericarditis
- 180,915 hospitalizations
Let’s get some perspective on these figures using another very common and widely utilized technology: the motor car. The number of people who died in the USA from motor vehicle accidents, 40,698 in 2018, is in the same order as the VAERS figure for COVID-19 vaccines.
However, the VAERS figure is widely considered to be an underestimate of the real figure, with Pantazatos and Seligmann (2021) suggesting the reported number of adverse events might just represent 5% of the total.
But even if we stick to the official numbers, how can we consider COVID-19 “vaccines” to be safe? We, as in society generally, do not consider motor vehicles to be intrinsically safe. They are intrinsically, or unavoidably, unsafe.
That’s why society has seen fit to instigate a bunch of processes that aim to make them safer, from the design of the vehicles to the licensing of drivers, to the creation of safer cars and roads, and of course, the creation of laws, supported by human and robotic enforcement, that attempt to ensure safer (but not entirely safe) driving and road use.
The shots on the other hand are administered by people who say the products they are administering are safe, with no hint that they might lead to death or permanent injury, despite this being a real, albeit low probability, consequence.
There is no admittance that the manufacturers, like car manufacturers, should be pressured into making safer COVID-19 vaccines.
It seems we’re meant to blindly accept what they’ve produced at breakneck speed — and just lump it (that means accepting and paying for injuries, given we, the taxpayers, fund the government indemnity programs).
It’s not just the relentless use of the word “safe” by authorities and so-called “health systems” — it’s also their actions.
Right up there has to be the fact that they are deemed safe enough to administer to our most vulnerable, including babies as young as 6 months and pregnant women. Which pregnant woman or new mother gets to sign a consent form that asks her to accept possible harms or future fertility impacts on her unborn child or baby? None, it seems.
The effectiveness claim used in the mantra “safe and effective” is also dubious. But it’s tougher to argue against given the health authorities could say, as they have done, that they have elsewhere qualified what they mean.
This would include suggesting that effectiveness is measured only over short durations such as 6 months or less, and it now refers to the protection against severe disease and death, not to the ability of the product to stop transmission from human to human (the usual intended purpose of vaccines).
Accordingly, let’s not open this can of worms right now.
Cracks in the narrative
Amidst the bleak background of COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced harms is some light; light that’s breaking through the cracks in the narrative. The sands are now definitely shifting, with increasing numbers who were previously steadfast advocates of the unquestionable safety of COVID-19 “vaccines” doing U-turns.
That’s mainly a function of the available science and the fact so many have either directly experienced adverse effects or know people close to them who have.
I sense that the authorities as well as the media and tech companies that are trying to control the message and sideline dissent through censorship and manipulation of messaging using behavioral science have underestimated the power of experience.
Let me give you three important areas where these cracks are appearing.
The first is the science — and I’ve given you earlier in this article examples of two big studies in big journals by authors from big-name institutions. That’s a far cry from early-mid 2021 when these signals could only be found in studies on preprint servers and occasionally in minor journals.
For good measure, an article in Science — one of the most influential scientific journals in the world — caught my eye when it was published some 10 days ago.
It’s not a study but it’s an insight piece that provides a perspective on the elevated risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination based on widely published data (i.e., it will inevitably underestimate risks).
Included in the article are quotes from mainstream experts, including Paul Offit, who do not recommend boosters to children or healthy people under 65.
Also, the notion of previously undescribed post-vaccination syndrome linked specifically to COVID-19 vaccines, as explained by Josef Finsterer from the Neurology and Neurophysiology Center in Vienna, Austria, is entering the mainstream medical community.
Mainstream doctors often won’t have any idea of how to treat it having no pre-set pathway established by their health systems. But they’ve often seen too many cases that have been temporally associated with vaccination to continue to deny what they are observing.
The second area where cracks are appearing is among politicians. Take the latest All Party Parliamentary Group on Covid-19 Vaccine Damage that we reported on separately on Oct. 27. And a stunning change in view is that of Danielle Smith, the 19th premier of Alberta, Canada, who only took office on Oct. 11.
Responding to a question from a journalist at Rebel News, Ms. Smith replied:
“I’m deeply sorry for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to discrimination as a result of their vaccination status. I am deeply sorry for any government employee who was fired from their job because of their vaccine status. I’d welcome them back if they wanted to come back.”
That’s a full 360-degree turnaround on premier Smith’s predecessor. You can see her full response at a press conference here.
A government data leak in Australia reported on Oct. 26 by Sky News Australia revealed the Australian government is budgeting for an 80-fold increase in COVID-19 vaccine injury payments, to nearly $77 million for 2023. That will be mana to some politicians, no doubt.
A third area is the recognition of a corrupt or broken system by mainstream players. Take what America’s top litigator for vaccine injury cases has said about the prospects for COVID-19 vaccine injury claims.
In June 2021, Maglio told Reuters, not some local rag or even the Epoch Times, that “the current system for handling COVID-related claims is different [from previous systems] — and not in a good way.”
There’s a statement on the website of Maglio’s law firm, Maglio Christopher & Toale, that is likely deeply disheartening to many victims of COVID-19 “vaccine” injury:
“We have concluded that there is nothing our attorneys can do to help you in filing a claim in the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.”
When both the top law firm dealing with the U.S. “vaccine court” and Reuters agree there is a “black hole” for COVID-19 vaccine injury claims, to use Reuters’ own words, that means the main players, not just those disheveled conspiracy theorist types, recognize the system has been manipulated to work against the public interest.
More to the point, to favor a protected class — the people who profit from making these new “vaccine” technologies that are being trialed on humans as if they were experimental guinea pigs. While making it ever harder for those injured to be compensated for the damage that can be guaranteed to occur.
As disgusting as that is, it’s also just the stuff that causes people to say, you know what; I’m going to stop buying into the stuff those health authorities are feeding us, including the fact they’re claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are safe. They wonder why we distrust governments and why politics in many countries has become something of a circus.
Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.
Rob Verkerk, Ph.D., is the founder and executive & scientific director of Alliance for Natural Health International.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
The fake world, based on isolation and total digital control almost completed. NWO/WEF (ex) Members.
11/02/22
•
› VIEWS
3 Reasons the Official COVID Narrative Is Falling Apart
It’s becoming ever more clear that the major, most influential health authorities around the world are now blatantly lying to the public, given the current status of scientific and medical information.
By
Alliance for Natural Health International
Link copied
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
By Rob Verkerk, Ph.D.
It’s becoming ever more clear that the major, most influential health authorities around the world are now blatantly lying to the public, given the current status of scientific and medical information.
Why do I say this?
The answer is simple: because the most influential health authorities are communicating to the public, both in words and in actions, the view that COVID-19 “vaccines” are “safe and effective” when the totality of available evidence suggests otherwise.
Let me explain.
Shouting from the webpage of what is the world’s largest “health system,” the U.K.’s National Health Service, is the statement below, in bold text, declaring the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 “vaccines.”
The following screengrab was taken Oct. 27:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, like so many others, parrots the same information, using bold text for emphasis in the new, lockstep tradition.
The following screengrab was also taken Oct. 27:
It is widely acknowledged that the proportion of proven cases of injury from COVID-19 vaccines is currently very small compared with the total number of doses administered. But this metric is not sufficient to declare a product as safe.
After all, society seems quite happy to deem a children’s toy unsafe even if there is just a theoretical risk of injury — let alone a demonstrated one that has led to death or permanent injury.
The Oxford Dictionary tells us that a product that is safe is one that is “free from hurt or damage.” The Cambridge Dictionary offers a similar meaning: “not in danger or likely to be harmed.” Obviously, there are some harms that are inevitable and would be readily accepted by most who were being offered an injectable medicine, even saline.
These minor harms include common reactions caused by the breach of the skin by the hypodermic needle or even the risk of fainting from “needle phobia.” Then there are nocebo responses that might include headache or fatigue.
But that’s not what we’re talking about here. What’s much more relevant is the rapidly building evidence base that shows substantial differences in severe reactions between injecting a placebo and the real thing.
Sadly and to confuse the wider picture — quite probably deliberately — some of the clinical trials have not been conducted with saline controls, but rather with other vaccines or with mixtures of adjuvants.
This aside, let’s look at two pieces of relatively recent evidence from available data that any court would likely find hard to ignore, that demonstrate the COVID-19 “vaccines” should not and cannot be regarded as safe based on clear-cut differences between treatment and placebo arm results.
Study 1: Haas et al., Journal of the American Medical Association (January 2022)
The first is a comprehensive meta-analysis of 12 clinical trials published in January this year in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association.
The study was led by Julia Haas from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and among the 8 author-strong team was senior author, Ted Kaptchuk, from Harvard Medical School. This is not a marginalized journal, nor a marginalized or discredited authorship.
The findings show a clear and pronounced, statistically significant elevation in severity and number of adverse events in those receiving the COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA, adenoviral vector and protein subunit types), compared with those receiving controls — especially after the second of two doses included in the trials.
That’s it — it should be GAME OVER for any claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe.”
A second study in a major high-impact journal should make it not just GAME OVER but a SLAM DUNK. Turns out there is at least one. In fact, there are many more; I have simply been selective in providing two composite studies (meta-analyses) that in turn include many other studies.
Study 2: Fraiman et al., Vaccine (September 2022)
The authorship of the second study I’ve selected is equally star-studded, including leading researchers from UCLA, Stanford and the University of Maryland, the latter including as its senior (last) author, Peter Doshi, also a senior editor at The BMJ.
What these authors did was painfully tease apart available data from the phase 3 trials that Pfizer and Moderna used to gain their emergency use authorizations (EUAs).
The authors found a consistent trend for significantly greater risks for serious adverse events in the COVID-19 “vaccine” arms compared with placebos, the risk ratios being between 1.36 and 1.57 times greater in the “vaccine” arms for those adverse events defined as being of “special interest.”
These include criteria developed specifically for COVID-19 vaccines by the Brighton Collaboration, and have been agreed upon by the World Health Organization.
The common clotting and heart health issues we see around us today were actually concealed in the data reviewed by the likes of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the European Medicines Agency at the time the EUAs were issued.
They were just ignored by the regulators. That includes the coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries and the myocarditis/pericarditis issues that all jumped off the journal pages.
Joseph Fraiman and colleagues, the authors of the study, had difficulty getting to the bottom of the data in these trials given that both Pfizer and Moderna kept protocols secret and failed to make public individual participant data.
They decided to publish the letter they sent to Albert Bourla and Stéphane Bancel, the respective CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, in a Rapid Response to The BMJ in August, raising their concerns over non-transparency. We drew attention to this major problem in 2020, here and here.
Damning stuff — yet not even a squeak from the vaccine confidence brigade. Punch in (as I just have) “Doshi” in the search bar of The Vaccine Confidence Project and you’ll find zero hits.
Then follow this by plugging in “Offit,” as in Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, also a long-term vaccine protagonist, albeit one who has been voicing caution over COVID-19 vaccines to healthy youngsters.
You’ll find multiple pages of hits when you use Offit’s name. Have they not worked out that it’s this kind of illogic and imbalance that adds to our lack of confidence?
What was concealed from view in the Phase 3 trials, is the disturbing picture of the spectrum of neurological injury that we are now witnessing from the real-world, population-wide roll-out that appears to be linked to COVID-19 vaccines, albeit not commonly, but predictably uncommonly.
Then there are suggestions of increasing cancer incidence, this inevitably clouded by cancer cases among those who didn’t receive standard care during the lockdowns as well as emerging evidence of natural killer and T cell exhaustion following repeat COVID-19 “vaccination.”
Even more challenging will be deconstruction of the long-term complications caused by this new technology that will inevitably be delayed in time post-vaccination and become ever more difficult to unwrap as people get exposed to more shots while the virus continues to circulate and infect people.
High on the watch list are fertility, autoimmune conditions and the smorgasbord of chronic, degenerative diseases associated with aging populations, especially in industrialized countries.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/embed/defender-sms-reminders-v2
Are COVID ‘vaccines’ unavoidably unsafe?
U.S. courts established some 40 years ago (e.g., here and here) that traditional vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The precedent set the scene for vaccine makers to seek indemnity from governments, which would then make the vaccine makers immune from prosecution in the event of no-fault (i.e., non-negligent) injury.
Compensation would then be available in cases where causation of vaccine injury could be proven. That was the theory.
Those of us who have been aware of these issues for many years know just how difficult it is to prove causation.
But those who know it even better are the vaccine injured themselves as they often spend years, at huge personal cost, attempting to work their way on behalf of loved ones through the compensation schemes in different countries.
More often than not they’re spat out of the process and left to contend with life-changing injuries without any state support.
Disturbingly, given that so many of us have now been exposed to the virus, it’s also easy for authorities to try disguising COVID-19 “vaccine” harms under the general HEADING of “long COVID.”
In the U.K. alone, the Office for National Statistics estimates that as of Sept. 3, 2.3 million people are “living in private households who are experiencing self-reported long COVID symptoms.”
Aside from the issue of conflating “vaccine” and virus-induced harms, the current data reported even by official sources are pointing to an emerging problem of an unprecedented scale.
Official data associated with COVID-19 shots in the USA, as reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as summarized on OpenVAERS.com, currently reveals:
- 59,127 permanently disabled
- 34,492 life-threatening injuries
- 31,569 deaths
- 53,302 reported cases of myocarditis/pericarditis
- 180,915 hospitalizations
Let’s get some perspective on these figures using another very common and widely utilized technology: the motor car. The number of people who died in the USA from motor vehicle accidents, 40,698 in 2018, is in the same order as the VAERS figure for COVID-19 vaccines.
However, the VAERS figure is widely considered to be an underestimate of the real figure, with Pantazatos and Seligmann (2021) suggesting the reported number of adverse events might just represent 5% of the total.
But even if we stick to the official numbers, how can we consider COVID-19 “vaccines” to be safe? We, as in society generally, do not consider motor vehicles to be intrinsically safe. They are intrinsically, or unavoidably, unsafe.
That’s why society has seen fit to instigate a bunch of processes that aim to make them safer, from the design of the vehicles to the licensing of drivers, to the creation of safer cars and roads, and of course, the creation of laws, supported by human and robotic enforcement, that attempt to ensure safer (but not entirely safe) driving and road use.
The shots on the other hand are administered by people who say the products they are administering are safe, with no hint that they might lead to death or permanent injury, despite this being a real, albeit low probability, consequence.
There is no admittance that the manufacturers, like car manufacturers, should be pressured into making safer COVID-19 vaccines.
It seems we’re meant to blindly accept what they’ve produced at breakneck speed — and just lump it (that means accepting and paying for injuries, given we, the taxpayers, fund the government indemnity programs).
It’s not just the relentless use of the word “safe” by authorities and so-called “health systems” — it’s also their actions.
Right up there has to be the fact that they are deemed safe enough to administer to our most vulnerable, including babies as young as 6 months and pregnant women. Which pregnant woman or new mother gets to sign a consent form that asks her to accept possible harms or future fertility impacts on her unborn child or baby? None, it seems.
The effectiveness claim used in the mantra “safe and effective” is also dubious. But it’s tougher to argue against given the health authorities could say, as they have done, that they have elsewhere qualified what they mean.
This would include suggesting that effectiveness is measured only over short durations such as 6 months or less, and it now refers to the protection against severe disease and death, not to the ability of the product to stop transmission from human to human (the usual intended purpose of vaccines).
Accordingly, let’s not open this can of worms right now.
Cracks in the narrative
Amidst the bleak background of COVID-19 “vaccine”-induced harms is some light; light that’s breaking through the cracks in the narrative. The sands are now definitely shifting, with increasing numbers who were previously steadfast advocates of the unquestionable safety of COVID-19 “vaccines” doing U-turns.
That’s mainly a function of the available science and the fact so many have either directly experienced adverse effects or know people close to them who have.
I sense that the authorities as well as the media and tech companies that are trying to control the message and sideline dissent through censorship and manipulation of messaging using behavioral science have underestimated the power of experience.
Let me give you three important areas where these cracks are appearing.
The first is the science — and I’ve given you earlier in this article examples of two big studies in big journals by authors from big-name institutions. That’s a far cry from early-mid 2021 when these signals could only be found in studies on preprint servers and occasionally in minor journals.
For good measure, an article in Science — one of the most influential scientific journals in the world — caught my eye when it was published some 10 days ago.
It’s not a study but it’s an insight piece that provides a perspective on the elevated risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination based on widely published data (i.e., it will inevitably underestimate risks).
Included in the article are quotes from mainstream experts, including Paul Offit, who do not recommend boosters to children or healthy people under 65.
Also, the notion of previously undescribed post-vaccination syndrome linked specifically to COVID-19 vaccines, as explained by Josef Finsterer from the Neurology and Neurophysiology Center in Vienna, Austria, is entering the mainstream medical community.
Mainstream doctors often won’t have any idea of how to treat it having no pre-set pathway established by their health systems. But they’ve often seen too many cases that have been temporally associated with vaccination to continue to deny what they are observing.
The second area where cracks are appearing is among politicians. Take the latest All Party Parliamentary Group on Covid-19 Vaccine Damage that we reported on separately on Oct. 27. And a stunning change in view is that of Danielle Smith, the 19th premier of Alberta, Canada, who only took office on Oct. 11.
Responding to a question from a journalist at Rebel News, Ms. Smith replied:
“I’m deeply sorry for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to discrimination as a result of their vaccination status. I am deeply sorry for any government employee who was fired from their job because of their vaccine status. I’d welcome them back if they wanted to come back.”
That’s a full 360-degree turnaround on premier Smith’s predecessor. You can see her full response at a press conference here.
A government data leak in Australia reported on Oct. 26 by Sky News Australia revealed the Australian government is budgeting for an 80-fold increase in COVID-19 vaccine injury payments, to nearly $77 million for 2023. That will be mana to some politicians, no doubt.
A third area is the recognition of a corrupt or broken system by mainstream players. Take what America’s top litigator for vaccine injury cases has said about the prospects for COVID-19 vaccine injury claims.
In June 2021, Maglio told Reuters, not some local rag or even the Epoch Times, that “the current system for handling COVID-related claims is different [from previous systems] — and not in a good way.”
There’s a statement on the website of Maglio’s law firm, Maglio Christopher & Toale, that is likely deeply disheartening to many victims of COVID-19 “vaccine” injury:
“We have concluded that there is nothing our attorneys can do to help you in filing a claim in the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.”
When both the top law firm dealing with the U.S. “vaccine court” and Reuters agree there is a “black hole” for COVID-19 vaccine injury claims, to use Reuters’ own words, that means the main players, not just those disheveled conspiracy theorist types, recognize the system has been manipulated to work against the public interest.
More to the point, to favor a protected class — the people who profit from making these new “vaccine” technologies that are being trialed on humans as if they were experimental guinea pigs. While making it ever harder for those injured to be compensated for the damage that can be guaranteed to occur.
As disgusting as that is, it’s also just the stuff that causes people to say, you know what; I’m going to stop buying into the stuff those health authorities are feeding us, including the fact they’re claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are safe. They wonder why we distrust governments and why politics in many countries has become something of a circus.
Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.
Rob Verkerk, Ph.D., is the founder and executive & scientific director of Alliance for Natural Health International.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
Each year, the self-proclaimed ruling class spend a week in Davos, Switzerland,
discussing their visions of the future and how to impose their ambitions on the rest of the
world
They believe the future is theirs to create. They believe they, the attendees in that room,
have all the power. And. by extension, they think that the rest of the world, those unfit to
wear a Davos Forum badge, have no say in the matter
Among their plans is to track your carbon footprint. They want to track where you travel,
how you travel, what you eat and any other resources you might use in your day-to-day
life.
Each year, the self-proclaimed ruling class spend a week in Davos, Switzerland,
discussing their visions of the future and how to impose their ambitions on the rest of the
world
They believe the future is theirs to create. They believe they, the attendees in that room,
have all the power. And. by extension, they think that the rest of the world, those unfit to
wear a Davos Forum badge, have no say in the matter
Among their plans is to track your carbon footprint. They want to track where you travel,
how you travel, what you eat and any other resources you might use in your day-to-day
life
To start, individual carbon footprint tracking will be sold to you as a way for you to be a
responsible citizen and track your own carbon footprint. In time, your carbon footprint
will be part and parcel of your social credit score, and used to place restrictions on your
way of life
They also openly admit that their plans will cause pain for the populace. We have to
expect shortages of food and energy, for example, because they’ve decided societal
changes need to occur faster than what the “green” technology sector can keep up with
To start, individual carbon footprint tracking will be sold to you as a way for you to be a
responsible citizen and track your own carbon footprint. In time, your carbon footprint
will be part and parcel of your social credit score, and used to place restrictions on your
way of life
In the 21st Century, a new threat to democracy and the people’s rule has emerged. That is the party of Davos, the alliance of transnational corporations, and their representatives as the leaders and managers of global governance.
This has yielded an emerging system of inverted totalitarianism on a global scale. Transnational corporate rule is not limited by national rules and regulations, and its tentacles are now everywhere.
To frame this regarding the specific case of science and medicine, Sheldon Wolin presciently wrote:
“One of the things we have seen over the last 30 or 40 years is a gradual silencing of people who are doctors or scientists,” Saul said.
“They are silenced by the managerial methodology of contracts. You sign an employment contract that says everything you know belongs to the people who hired you. You are not allowed to speak out. Take that [right] away and you have a gigantic educated group who has a great deal to say and do, but they are tied up.
They don’t know how to untie themselves. They come out with their Ph.D. They are deeply in debt. The only way they can get a job is to give up their intellectual freedom. They are prisoners.”
Regulatory and operational capture of the hospitals, health insurance and physicians is almost 100% complete now. The government, big pharma, big tech and hospitalists have worked in consort to silence scientists and physicians.
At the national level, we see its effects on the judicial, legislative and executive branches.
On the international level, the money and power from the transnational organizations have bought off entities like the World Health Organization.
The nominal head and coordinating body of this globalized effort to control the world through capitalism has become the World Economic Forum, whose primary belief is that national boundaries are less important than global connectivity and management through corporatism.
The pandemic of events of 2019/2020 has reshaped the political, social and cultural scene more than any event since the Second World War. We see the effects all around the world with greater and greater impediments to travel, and disappearance of democracy.
Draconian laws introduced to target a disease but which are aimed at local populations to better bring them under control/enslave. But to understand what is happening today, one needs the overview of human developments/past history because it is repeating itself.
WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
By Antony C. Sutton.
TABLE OF CONTENT
On the other hand, it may be observed that both the extreme right and the extreme left of the
conventional political spectrum are absolutely collectivist. The national socialist (for example,
the fascist) and the international socialist (for example, the Communist) both recommend
totalitarian politico-economic systems based on naked, unfettered political power and
individual coercion. Both systems require monopoly control of society.
While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J. P. Morgan and J. D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to
gain an unchallenged monopoly was to “go political” and make society go to work for the
monopolists — under the name of the public good and the public interest.
This strategy was detailed in 1906 by Frederick C. Howe in his Confessions of a Monopolist.1 Howe, by the way, is also a figure in the story of the Bolshevik Revolution.
Laura’s book, The Secret History of the World , is the most complete source for her
research and analysis of history.
Article by DR Mercola.
HIS STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Klaus Schwab, owner and chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is now the most dangerous man in the world
- WEF’s ultimate goal is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the technocratic elite who control it
- WEF relies on fearmongering; when the population is controlled by fear, it welcomes authoritarian “protections” like increased surveillance and digital identity systems, introduced under the guise of safety, but which ultimately remove personal autonomy and freedom
- WEF’s goal isn’t to just control life on Earth but to fundamentally change it by hacking into humans and removing free will
- WEF, in partnership with investment firm BlackRock, has infiltrated the government and is colluding in corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population
- You can protect your sovereignty by relying on your own critical thinking and choosing bravery over obedience
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the personification of The Great Reset — the ultimate goal of which is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the technocratic elite who control it.
In the video above, comedian JP Sears outlines the primary reasons why this makes Schwab easily among the most dangerous people in the world — and arguably the most dangerous. One of The Great Reset’s “new normal” dictums is that you’ll own nothing and be happy. This is part of WEF’s 2030 agenda,1 and a plan is already in place to make it happen.
These are criminal enterprises. And now you’re taking away any economic or legal incentive for them to be have? What do you think they’re going to do? You think they found Jesus suddenly? And they’re going to take care of us and our children? That they’re suddenly concerned with public health? No. They took away due process rulemaking. They’ve taken away our right to be free of warrants, of searches and seizures, with this very intrusive track and trace surveillance, etc. Oh, we are watching something now that I never believed that I would see in my lifetime. And I read George Orwell and Aldous Huxley and dystopian science fiction novels warning that one day the United States would be overtaken by fascism. Fascism incidentally is defined — Mussolini defined it — as a merger of state and corporate power —as orchestrated by Tony Fauci.
When it walks like a gigantic global conspiracy and talks like a gigantic global conspiracy it’s … transphobic racist paranoia to identify it as a gigantic global conspiracy.
More seriously, the reason none of this is discussed is probably a mixture of the covidians tripling down on the sanctity of their sacrament, and the Machiavellians understanding full well that admitting they were this wrong and this mendacious would end with literal heads on literal pikes. Since they control corporate, state, and media power, they don’t have to admit anything. So they don’t.
What we’re seeing today — what we’re seeing today is what I call turnkey totalitarianism. They are putting in place all of these technological mechanisms for control we’ve never seen before. It’s been the ambition of every totalitarian state from the beginning of mankind to control every aspect of behavior, of conduct or thought and to obliterate dissent. None of them have been able todo it. They didn’t have the technological capacity. Even in Hitler’s Germany, you could cross the Alps into Switzerland. You could hide in the attic like Anne Frank did. I visited, in 1962, East Germany with my father, and met people who had climbed the wall and escaped. So it was possible. Many died truly, but it was possible. Today, the mechanisms are being put in place that will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide. Within five years, we’re going to see 415,000 low orbit satellites. Bill Gates says his 65,000satellites alone will be able to look at every square inch of the planet 24 hours a day. They’re putting in 5G to harvest our data and control our behavior — digital currency that will allow them to punish us from a distance and cut off our food supply — vaccine passports. You have a series of rights. As flawed as our government is, you can still go out and go to a bar. You can go to a sporting event. You can get on a bus or an airplane and you can travel. You have certain freedoms. You can get educated, et cetera.
The minute they hand you that vaccine passport, every right that you have is transformed into a privilege contingent upon your obedience to arbitrary government dictates. It will make you a slave. And what do we do about this? What do we do? We resist. I’m going to tell you three rules that you will all need to know and memorize. Number one, every power the government takes from us it will never relinquish voluntarily. They tell you we just want you to lock down for two weeks, just to flatten the curve in the hospitals. But then 20months later, they still have us locked down. And even when they give up, when they close the lockdowns and let us go back to normal, they are not relinquishing the power to do it to you again and again and again. They now have power and they will never let it go until we make them let it go. Power through the backdoor by creating incidents).
Number two, every power they take from us, they will ultimately abuse to the maximum extent possible.
Number three, nobody in the history of the planet has ever complied their way out of totalitarian control. Every coup, every capitulation is a signal to the oppressors to oppose new forms of torment or torture or compliance or obedience. Every time you comply, you get weaker.
The hill that you’re going to die on is the hill that you’re on right now. And they’re coming for our children. And every time they push you back when you say yes because you think if I just do this, we can all return to normal. Every time they talk you and fool you, bullies cannot be appeased. It just encourages them to new forms of torture and torment.
Every time you say yes, you’re getting pushed back to a weaker position. That’s why we need to resist today. You, all of you in the crowd, I thank you, I love you. You came out on this cold cold day to do your duty for the United States of America. Let’s go and fight for freedom and let’s build back for our children the America that our parents fought and died for. Thank you very much. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
So if we don’t believe in evil, we will always be a sucker for the colorful ribbons and lollipops of those who really want to steal our life and that of our progeny, and put us in digital cages where they can track and trace our every movement, our every word and our every thought to keep us in line with with their tyrannical agendas. With the COVID Vaccines Came a old Dream Come True for Central Banks.
Paired with the rollout of related surveillance technologies — digital tracking devices, vaccine passports, brain-machine interfaces and planet-wide 5G — COVID vaccines are a critical component of central bankers’ plan to establish a global control grid. The Antichrists’ expressed through AI and possible to play, mislead, misinformation.
This group is comprised of the most selfish, megalomaniacal, and sociopathic individuals, some of whom are bigshots in the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission global policy-making groups.
But these groups are not synonymous with The Cabal, since BC, CFR and TLC also contain some well-intentioned individuals. The Cabal is a kind of “parallel government” to the official elected and appointed governments of the more developed countries. In the Cabal five branches may be identified.
These branches are:
the Executive Branch, the Intelligence Branch, the War Department, the Weapons Industry Branch, the Financial Department
An analysis of the overall purposes of these five branches suggests that the overall purpose of the Cabal is to exercise covert control by: using/collecting comprehensive institutional and personal information.
Pushing/establishing national and international policy independently of the established Governments. Globalists/collectivist.
By developing and use of high-tech arms and equipment/media, and, with also include these, establishing small, specialized, highly-mobile, elite military units to effect/influence these covert policies, portrayed and sold as protest and uprisings when need arises, without having to rely on the official (and “unreliable“) Armed Services, (whose subservience to the Cabal is reasonably suspect) by developing an armed capability to repel any threat to the status quo, (including the uncertain ontological, social, and economic impacts of any revelation of the reality of UFO and extraterrestrial presence) through the development of a Star Wars/BMDO ground and space-based surveillance and SDI weapons network
Secrecy: by denying information compromising to the Cabal from all those outside “need-to-know” policymaking levels by exercising control on the money supply, availability of credit, and the worth of money, through policy decisions made outside of the official Governments
The Cabal are also the rogue group behind the continuation of the unauthorized UFO Cover-Up and very important to hide there cooperation and possible be controlled by Aliens.
Unfortunately, The Cabal has its proxies on some of the seats in the Special Studies Group of the U.S. National Security Council, which controls official-government UFO information and access.
Since the Cabal has enormous international wealth at its disposal, it has the funds and influence to make sure that the majority of presentations which make it to public view are negativistic in tone.
Cute/smart, evil, if they can’t sell you the lie that “UFOs don’t exist“, then their fall-back strategy is to convince you that “they are evil mean invaders.” Thus, the presentations they finance
and promote feature the Star Visitors as torturers, plotters and monsters.
The unauthorized UFO Cover-Up is to be distinguished from the official-government UFO Cover-Up. The unauthorized UFO Cover-Up is the organization that conducts/organized in reality kidnappings and behind terrorizing of innocent civilians, camouflaged as “alien abductions”.
They do wholesale “cattle mutilations”, hoping that angry ranchers and terrorized citizens will blame it on “the aliens”.
It should also be noted that some of the lurid reports being palmed off on the public as examples of “alien misbehavior” are actually secret psychological warfare operations by human rogue military-intelligence units. These renegade military-intelligence units kidnap civilians without legal
authorization or justification. These units drug those they kidnap, (often experiencers).
These renegades deliberately intimidate, interrogate, physically abuse, and even gang-rape the civilians they kidnap. The renegade military-intelligence units then use brainwashing techniques to make the civilians they kidnap forget about the military kidnapping, while the renegades narco-hypnotically implant a false memory about the horrific experience as an “alien abduction”.
This is the level of evil, distortion and treachery that the Cabal repressing UFO truth goes to to
protect their monopoly of highly-advanced extraterrestrial technology recovered from UFO crashes: a monopoly which has brought them trillions of dollars in profits over the last four-plus decades. Advanced and legalized by the State.
The Cabal’s operatives also terrorize some UFO researchers who get too close, and even assassinate a few.
They hijack some psychotronic weaponry for unauthorized use on their enemies or on innocent civilian guinea pig test subjects. In general, most of the horrific stuff done under the UFO Cover-Up comes from The Cabal’s unauthorized version of the UFO Cover-Up, often using their plants within military and intelligence organizations to further camouflage who is at work.
The Cabal has been around for many millennia in its various incarnations as dark-side
shamanic practitioners, priest-craft organizations, and secret societies, whose inner initiates use
dark psychic arts for power, such as psychic projection, conjured hallucinations, and dream-insertions, etc. to intimidate and influence targeted individuals.
The human-like reptoid imagery they use sometimes has been a favorite over the millennia, as these dark-arts “magicians” shrewdly capitalize on a widespread natural abhorrence of reptiles.
Huge amounts of disinformation are being pumped out about Star Visitors, and to confuse things further, the Cabal make up or distort ancient legends and traditions about “fearsome creatures”, to create the illusion that, for example, such fake “resident evil reptilians” have been going on for centuries.
The Cabal have increased their power by consciously choosing to reincarnate into an Ego-focused new lifetime/persona, time and time again in successive lifetimes, continuing to associate with other dark-arts practitioners in groups who abuse their psi powers to manipulate, control, and gain more power.
As they have grown in power with each successive generation, their abilities far outstrip most persons with incidental and occasional psychic ability.
Further, the Cabal have over the centuries “eliminated the competition” by identifying psychically-gifted individuals (through social-network snitches, or by remote-sensing such good psychics), and then branding them as witches, warlocks, voodoo doctors, heretics, “devil-worshipers”, demons-in-disguise, etc., so that either the Cabal-controlled governments or a panicked citizenry will imprison or execute them.
To the prison born, There are none so enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Goethe
Then a few people wish to control and direct a mass of humanity, there are certain key structures that have to be in place. These are the same whether you are seeking to manipulate an individual, family, tribe, town, country, continent, or even a planet like Earth.
First you have to set the “norms”, what is considered right and wrong, possible or impossible, sane or insane, good and bad. Most of the people will simply follow those norms without question because of the baa-baa mentality, which has prevailed within the collective human mind for at least thousands of years. Second, you have to make life very unpleasant for those very few who challenge your imposed “norms”.
The most effective way to do this is to make it, in effect, a crime to be different. So those who beat to a
different drum, or voice a different view, version of “truth” and lifestyle, stand out like a black sheep in
the human herd. You have already conditioned that herd to accept your norms as reality and so, in their
arrogance and ignorance, they then ridicule or condemn those with a different spin on life.
This pressurizes them to conform and serves as a warning for those others in the herd who are also thinking of breaking away.
There is a Japanese saying that goes: Don’t be a nail that stands out above the rest because that’s the
first one to get hit.
This creates a situation fundamental to the few controlling the many in which the masses police themselves and keep each other in line. The sheep become the sheepdog for the rest of the herd.* It is like a prisoner trying to escape while the rest of his cellmates rush to stop him. If that happened we would say the prisoners were crazy, how could they do that?
- I know that strictly speaking the collective word for sheep is flock and not herd, but I prefer herd so sod convention.
But humans are doing precisely this to each other every day by demanding that everyone conform to the norms to which they blindly conform. This is nothing less than psychological fascism – the thought police with agents in every home, everywhere. Agents so deeply conditioned that most have no idea they are unpaid mind controllers. “I’m just doing what’s right for my children” I hear them say.
No, what you have been programmed to believe is right for them and the belief, also, that only you know best.
I remember debating with a former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom at the Oxford Union debating society and he simply could not see a difference between education and indoctrination. It was a wonder to behold.
We see this same theme in our daily experiences of people in uniform and others from the masses who are promoted to power over the masses. It’s summed up by the satirical version of the British Labor Party song, The Red Flag, which goes:
“The working class can kiss my arse, I’ve got the foreman’s job at last.”
This is all part of the divide and rule strategy so vital to ensuring that the herd will police itself.
Everyone plays a part in everyone else’s mental, emotional, and physical imprisonment.
All the controllers have to do is pull the right strings at the right time and make their human puppets dance to the appropriate tune.
This they do by dictating what is taught by what we bravely call “education” and what passes for “news”
through the media they own. In this way they can dictate to the unthinking, unquestioning, herd what it should believe about itself, other people, life, history, and current events. Once you set the norms in society, there is no need to control every journalist or reporter or government official. The media and the
institutions take their “truth” from those same norms and therefore ridicule and condemn by reflex action
anyone who offers another vision of reality.
Once you control what is considered “normal” and possible, the whole system virtually runs itself.
The end result is all around us: The quality of life (QOL) has been severely degraded for the vast majority of people now living in the USA but also the West as result of Power & greed.
“He (the false prophet who deceives many by his miracles) causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
During these dark and troubled times, the topic of “the mark of the beast” as mentioned in the Bible is
getting a lot of press, especially in relation to the bioweapon type COVID-19 shots, and transhumanism.
According to Childs, almost every notable person running the world today, from politics to business to
entertainment, got there through Freemasonry.
The Bible in the book of revelations and the second coming of Jesus Christ and this time as war lord.
Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret
Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order. The new Anti-Christ arriving and soon after
the second coming of Jesus Christ The penalty for renouncing your vows in Freemasonry is death, but he feels compelled to expose Freemasonry for what it is: the oldest religion in the world.
The implementation or consequences and warn about what is soon coming: the implementation of the Luciferian New World Order, which includes a significant reduction of the world’s population. Much of what we have published for the past year plus on the Plandemic, and the coming of the ”New World Order”, will now make much more sense once you finish viewing this video.
As I have written in other articles, there are two competing “kingdoms” on earth in the spiritual realm:
the Kingdom of Satan, referred to sometimes as the Kingdom of Darkness, and the Kingdom of God, or the Kingdom of Light.
Peter Madden is with Mick Joe Nì Bhrasaíl and 8 others.
11 uur · Look at what I have just stumbled upon whilst reading this book !So the Marburg plan was set in place over 100 years ago . 
To be finally accomplished by the Marburg virus now ? This book was written in 1974 
Link to the full book … essential knowledge
Dear Mr. President:
I am in sympathy with the Soviet form of government as that best suited
for the Russian people…
Letter to President Woodrow Wilson (October 17, 1918) from William
Lawrence Saunders, chairman, Ingersoll-Rand Corp.; director, American
International Corp.; and deputy chairman, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
The frontispiece in this book was drawn by cartoonist Robert Minor in 1911 for the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch. Minor was a talented artist and writer who doubled as a Bolshevik
revolutionary, got himself arrested in Russia in 1915 for alleged subversion, and was later bankrolled by prominent Wall Street financiers. Minor’s cartoon portrays a bearded, beaming Karl
Marx standing in Wall Street with Socialism tucked under his arm and accepting the
congratulations of financial luminaries J.P. Morgan, Morgan partner George W. Perkins, a
smug John D. Rockefeller, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Teddy Roosevelt —
prominently identified by his famous teeth — in the background. Wall Street is decorated by
Red flags. The cheering crowd and the airborne hats suggest that Karl Marx must have been a
fairly popular sort of fellow in the New York financial district.
Was Robert Minor dreaming? On the contrary, we shall see that Minor was on firm ground in
depicting an enthusiastic alliance of Wall Street and Marxist socialism. The characters in
Minor’s cartoon — Karl Marx (symbolizing the future revolutionaries Lenin and Trotsky), J. P.
Morgan, John D. Rockefeller — and indeed Robert Minor himself, are also prominent characters
in this book.
The contradictions suggested by Minor’s cartoon have been brushed under the rug of history
because they do not fit the accepted conceptual spectrum of political left and political right.
Bolsheviks are at the left end of the political spectrum and Wall Street financiers are at the
right end; therefore, we implicitly reason, the two groups have nothing in common and any
alliance between the two is absurd. Factors contrary to this neat conceptual arrangement are
usually rejected as bizarre observations or unfortunate errors. Modern history possesses such a
built-in duality and certainly if too many uncomfortable facts have been rejected and brushed
under the rug, it is an inaccurate history.
History
Trotsky was for world revolution, for world dictatorship; he was, in one word, an
internationalist.13 Bolshevists and bankers have then this significant common ground —
internationalism.
Revolution and international finance are not at all inconsistent if the result of
revolution is to establish more centralized authority. International finance prefers to deal with
central governments. The last thing the banking community wants is laissez-faire economy and
decentralized power because these would disperse power.
This, therefore, is an explanation that fits the evidence. This handful of bankers and promoters
was not Bolshevik, or Communist, or socialist, or Democrat, or even American. Above all else
these men wanted markets, preferably captive international markets — and a monopoly of the
captive world market as the ultimate goal. They wanted markets that could be exploited
monopolistically without fear of competition from Russians, Germans, or anyone else —
including American businessmen outside the charmed circle. This closed group was apolitical
and amoral. In 1917, it had a single-minded objective — a captive market in Russia, all
presented under, and intellectually protected by, the shelter of a league to enforce the peace.
On the other hand, it may be observed that both the extreme right and the extreme left of the
conventional political spectrum are absolutely collectivist. The national socialist (for example,
the fascist) and the international socialist (for example, the Communist) both recommend
totalitarian politico-economic systems based on naked, unfettered political power and
individual coercion.
Both systems require monopoly control of society.
While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J. P. Morgan and J. D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to “go political” and make society go to work for the
monopolists — under the name of the public good and the public interest.
This strategy was detailed in 1906 by Frederick C. Howe in his Confessions of a Monopolist.1 Howe, by the way, is also a figure in the story of the Bolshevik Revolution.
Therefore, an alternative conceptual packaging of political ideas and politico-economic
systems would be that of ranking the degree of individual freedom versus the degree of
centralized political control. Under such an ordering the corporate welfare state and socialism
are at the same end of the spectrum. Hence we see that attempts at monopoly control of society
can have different labels while owning common features.
Consequently, one barrier to mature understanding of recent history is the notion that all
capitalists are the bitter and unswerving enemies of all Marxists and socialists. This erroneous
idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In fact, the idea is
nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit concealed, alliance between international
political capitalists and international revolutionary socialists — to their mutual benefit.
Apart from Gabriel Kolko, Murray Rothbard, and the revisionists, historians have not been
alert for such a combination of events. Historical reporting, with rare exceptions, has been
forced into a dichotomy of capitalists versus socialists. George Kennan’s monumental and
readable study of the Russian Revolution consistently maintains this fiction of a Wall Street Bolshevik dichotomy.
Russia Leaves the War has a single incidental reference to the J.P. Morgan firm and no reference at all to Guaranty Trust Company. Yet both organizations are prominently mentioned in the State Department files, to which frequent reference is made in this book, and both are part of the core of the evidence presented here.
Neither self-admitted “Bolshevik banker” Olof Aschberg nor Nya Banken in Stockholm is mentioned in Kennan yet both were central to Bolshevik funding. Moreover, in minor yet crucial circumstances, at least
crucial for our argument, Kennan is factually in error. For example, Kennan cites Federal Reserve Bank director William Boyce Thompson as leaving Russia on November 27, 1917.
This departure date would make it physically impossible for Thompson to be in Petrograd on
December 2, 1917, to transmit a cable request for $1 million to Morgan in New York.
Thompson in fact left Petrograd on December 4, 1918, two days after sending the cable to New
York.
Then again, Kennan states that on November 30, 1917, Trotsky delivered a speech
before the Petrograd Soviet in which he observed, “Today I had here in the Smolny Institute
two Americans closely connected with American Capitalist elements “According to Kennan, it
“is difficult to imagine” who these two Americans “could have been, if not Robins and
Gumberg.” But in [act Alexander Gumberg was Russian, not American. Further, as Thompson
was still in Russia on November 30, 1917, then the two Americans who visited Trotsky were
more than likely Raymond Robins, a mining promoter turned do-gooder, and Thompson, of the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
http://www.voltairenet.org/…/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the…
THE MARBURG PLAN
The Marburg Plan, financed by Andrew Carnegie’s ample heritage, was produced in the early
years of the twentieth century. It suggests premeditation for this kind of superficial
schizophrenia, which in fact masks an integrated program of power acquisition: “What then if
Carnegie and his unlimited wealth, the international financiers and the Socialists could be
organized in a movement to compel the formation of a league to enforce peace.”
The governments of the world, according to the Marburg Plan, were to be socialized while the
ultimate power would remain in the hands of the international financiers “to control its councils
and enforce peace [and so] provide a specific for all the political ills of mankind.”
This idea was knit with other elements with similar objectives. Lord Milner in England
provides the transatlantic example of banking interests recognizing the virtues and possibilities
of Marxism. Milner was a banker, influential in British wartime policy, and pro-Marxist.
In New York the socialist “X” club was founded in 1903. It counted among its members not only
the Communist Lincoln Steffens, the socialist William English Walling, and the Communist
banker Morris Hillquit, but also John Dewey, James T. Shotwell, Charles Edward Russell, and
Rufus Weeks (vice president of New York Life Insurance Company). The annual meeting of
the Economic Club in the Astor Hotel, New York, witnessed socialist speakers. In 1908, when
A. Barton Hepburn, president of Chase National Bank, was president of the Economic Club,
the main speaker was the aforementioned Morris Hillquit, who “had abundant opportunity to
preach socialism to a gathering which represented wealth and financial interests.”11
From these unlikely seeds grew the modern internationalist movement, which included not
only the financiers Carnegie, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, Bernard Baruch, and Herbert Hoover,
but also the Carnegie Foundation and its progeny International Conciliation. The trustees of
Carnegie were, as we have seen, prominent on the board of American International
Corporation. In 1910 Carnegie donated $10 million to found the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, and among those on the board of trustees were Elihu Root (Root Mission
to Russia, 1917), Cleveland H. Dodge (a financial backer of President Wilson), George W.
Perkins (Morgan partner), G. J. Balch (AIC and Amsinck), R. F. Herrick (AIC), H. W. Pritchett
(AIC), and other Wall Street luminaries. Woodrow Wilson came under the powerful influence
of — and indeed was financially indebted to — this group of internationalists. As Jennings C.
Wise has written, “Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson… made it possible for
Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport.”
But Leon Trotsky also declared himself an internationalist. We have remarked with some
interest his high-level internationalist connections, or at least friends, in Canada. Trotsky then
was not pro-Russian, or pro-Allied, or pro-German, as many have tried to make him out to be.
Trotsky was for world revolution, for world dictatorship; he was, in one word, an
internationalist.
Bolshevists and bankers have then this significant common ground —
internationalism. Revolution and international finance are not at all inconsistent if the result of
revolution is to establish more centralized authority. International finance prefers to deal with
central governments. The last thing the banking community wants is laissez-faire economy and
decentralized power because these would disperse power.
Away from nature @destruction of reality.
Facebook origin is DARPA,
What does the Department of Defense DARPA do?
The central research and development organization of the United States Department of Defense (DoD). DARPA manages and directs selected basis and applied science projects and pursues research and technology considered high in risk and payoff and that hold the potential for dramatic advances for traditional military roles and missions.
Meta & It tricks the consciousness into detaching itself from any true emotional commitment, opting instead for artificial simulation, and endless, fundamentally empty-seeming reproductions. Essentially, satisfaction and happiness are found through simulation and imitation of the real, rather than through reality itself.
Question: Will The Metaverse Be Real-Life Matrix And Imprison Humanity?
By Ansh Srivastava, November 1, 2021
The Metaverse concept is made up of shared three-dimensional virtual spaces within a perceived virtual
universe, where the Internet has evolved into an augmented reality almost indistinguishable from reality
itself. What problems could this new technology bring? How in danger is reality as we know it?
Metaverse Be Real-Life Matrix
The comparison with the Matrix is not at all random. Those who saw the movie will remember the plot:
a dystopian future where almost all human beings have been enslaved by machines and artificial intelligence.
With their minds connected to a virtual reality where they spend their daily lives unaware that they are used by AI controlled super computers/machines to obtain energy. Bio-energy and refers to the fact that we humans are not at the end or on the top of the food change. Many higher lifeforces some visible other not need vibrations/frequencies as energy to manifest in our physical universe. Not using all types but part of it.
The difference with the metaverse that is coming is that we will have the ability to create those worlds
where we want to interact with other people and they will not be created by machines to deceive us. That is, we will be aware that they are not real worlds and that our true body is safe.
Matilda Macelroy story and recall of what Airl the captured Alien in Roswell in 1947 told her. His disk was send here from space after the detection of nuclear explosions on earth. What he told Matilda was that the life-forces ( spirits) end there are many different ones including in capacities existed outside our world ( immortals) and where bored. The where looking for distraction, loved working to imagine things, share, stimulated, appreciate.. As soon as they stopped thinking/imaging it it would disappear. Than started to add energy to it and it could stay for a much longer period. As long as they will add this energy to it our universe will expand. At the latter stage they introduced reproduction/food to keep it going and became predatory. ( We have to eat by killing/eating other manifestations being plants or animals). Many can still recall the preceding time when that was not the case. We call these forms manifestation and our whole physical universe is therefore energy based. The closed you can get from not eating/killing animals is by eating fruit. What did happen was creating spiritual induced life-force manifestation is time consuming and very complex. The spirits who could do that where hard to come by and wanted to get properly rewarded for there work. Other came up with a shortcut being reproduction and food function. With the creators now out of there main businesses left this part of our galaxy and never return. As a result the total number of different life-induced form started to shrimp. Have a look Matilda-Macelroy com.
Another agreement reached was that for the life-force to manifest here it would need energy or food as we call it. Unfortunately some player’s started to forget who they where and where they came from. Started to think and believe that this is there the physical based Universe only life/place/form.
Followed by the discovery and use of high voltages charges able to wish any previous knowledge about there existence before and during the presence this physical universe in the individualized spirits and used by others to enslave/exploit. That is what did happen to all of us currently on planet Earth. Back to Mark Zuckerberg. The life-force of spiritual part within our body is older than our universe.
Another thing he Airl told Matilda is that was that planet Earth is a galactic prison and we the humans come from different planets in this part. Because of the individualized spirit we should have freewill and live in a freewill designated zone but is being suppressed from every angle possible. Earth has a very bad name and most Alien talk about it as run by a mix of lunatics and butchers. Most of the bio-body based life-forms on other planets similar to us have a life span between 120-150 Earth years. The name hell a good description for the way in which most of us have to live/dye on planet Earth. After the rulers from what they called the old empire where gone the secrete police was left behind and to control and still do known as the deep State because intensive contacts at that level and also funded by the tax-payers. All major worldwide operating banks are part of it including acting as servants for/to Alien forces.
Back to Mark Zuckerberg.
At least that’s what Mark Zuckerberg promises, who this week announced the new name of his virtual reality service: Horizon, which will focus on digital interaction within a metaverse where users can play, interact, exercise, and even work.
«We are talking about a corporeal Internet: instead of looking at a screen, we will be« inside ». It will be
more natural and vivid: screens cannot connect the entire human experience, they cannot provide the idea of presence, ”said the owner of Facebook and – his now parent company – Meta.
«There will be avatars (a graphical representation of the user): with that, we are going to represent
ourselves in the metaverse. We will live with representative images of ourselves. It will be much richer
than the experiences we have today, “he added.
How will all this be accomplished? Well, Morpheus would tell us that no one can tell us what it is like,
that we should see it for ourselves. And in this case, to see it and experience it, we must have a virtual
reality viewer, similar – in the first instance – to the Oculus.
Metaverse Be Real-Life Matrix
Credit: Oculus VR.
Metaverse is control.
Supported by the brilliant ideas of the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard ( Simulation and Simulation ),
the management team of the then Wachowski brothers produced a narrative that served as a kind of warning against the control systems that use semiotics and avatars to influence our thought patterns.
Metaverse Be Real-Life Matrix
Playing with other people in the world as if we were face to face, it will be possible in the Metaverse.
And while those deeply involved in the augmented reality (AR) and virtual (VR) space perceive the rise of
the real metaverse as a positive advance in harnessing the power of computing, some have begun to ring the warning bells.
Privacy, tracking (both physical location and eye-tracking), access, and the opportunity to monitor us –
as Zuckerberg puts it – ‘from within’, are issues to consider. In fact, virtual land grabbing has already
begun, with Meta (Facebook) pioneering many other companies that will surely come before many have realized what is happening.
And if the metaverse is control, the advancement of artificial intelligence and brain-computer interfaces
could put that control in hands beyond human capabilities – just as in the Matrix, where that control is so
effectively exercised by machines. as chilling.
The Rise Of Hyperreality
Baudrillard suggests that the world we live in has been replaced by a copied world, where we seek nothing more than simulated stimuli. This has been called hyperreality: a paradigm that explains, among other things, the cultural condition of the First World West.
Consumerism, due to its dependence on sign value, is the contributing factor for the creation of hyperreality.
It tricks the consciousness into detaching itself from any true emotional commitment, opting instead for
artificial simulation, and endless, fundamentally empty-seeming reproductions. Essentially, satisfaction and happiness are found through simulation and imitation of the real, rather than through reality itself.
The interaction in a hyper-real place like the proposed metaverse finds its most precise analogy in a Las
Vegas casino, where the sensation of going through a fantasy world is given, where everyone contributes to the illusion. The decor is not authentic, everything is a copy, and the whole experience feels like a dream.
which is not a dream, of course, is that the casino keeps the money, and one is more likely to hand over
that money if one does not realize what is really going on. In other words, even if one intellectually
understands how a casino works, one’s own conscience believes that gambling at the casino is part of the
“unreal” world. The interest of the decorators is to emphasize the appearance of the facade of the whole,
to pretend that the whole experience is unreal.
Addiction to illusion
If we consider recent world events, in a way, this was — like Agent Smith’s catchphrase — unavoidable.
The COVID-19 quarantine made everyone imagine such a world. A world where we can be the best versions of our imaginary selves without leaving our homes and doing things that we can only imagine doing.
However, the effects of this prolonged isolation also increased people’s anxiety, insomnia, and, above all,
addictions.
With this in mind, that human beings are so prone to addiction in today’s world that disconnecting is still
an option, what happens to us when that refuge is impossible? Just imagine the level of addiction we would have in a metaverse in which stimulation, pleasure, and social connection are multisensory, omnipresent, and immediate.
Metaverse
What Horizon promises.
Credit: Meta.
Dysmorphia, anxiety, and depression will be equally pervasive and urgent. At this point, there is no treatment.
There is no way to stop and get off this train. We would be thrown into this world from birth without the
ability to recognize its virality and make the intentional decision to disembark. The speed at which life
happens would make it impossible to opt-out.
So welcome to the metaverse. We are literally creating our own Matrix, which we would be pathetically waiting for Morpheus to come calling with a red or blue pill (blue like the Meta / Facebook logo) to save us.
References:
What is the Metaverse, and do I have to care? – The Verge.
How ‘The Matrix Resurrections’ Can Help Us Answer Some of the Most Important Questions About the Emerging Real Metaverse – Next Reality .
Metaverse is the Matrix – Jason Lim / Korean Times.
Humanityandearth.com links:
Links
Humans are not at the top of the food chain but part of it!
Pushing the fake & synthetic food agenda! – My Blog (humanityandearth.com)
Pushing the fake & synthetic food agenda!
The Federal Reserve Endgame Is Not a Collapse, It’s Global Domination
New Studies Deliver Harsh Verdicts on Mask Mandates, Vaccine Mandates for U.S. Cities
Emergency powers should be used only in case of war.
Skull and Bones Society & Thule society! – My Blog (humanityandearth.com)
Skull and Bones Society & Thule society!
Ron Hubbard, Founder, of the Church of Scientology.
The Change Agents for EU and Globalists who ‘Lead beyond authority’.
The Change Agents for EU and Globalists who ‘Lead beyond authority’.
Digital identity, digital twins, programmable central bank digital currency, a social credit system, human
augmentation and the Internet of Bodies (IoB). These are all part of the dystopian future being rolled out by
the globalist cabal as the “solutions” to all the world’s problems and have created.
De-population attempts?
The great food reset.
The physical Universe.
Antarctica and the hollow planets!
Is planet Earth hell?
Humanity & History!
Health and Ageing!
Mind control, US destruction from inside out!
Africa, Marduk’s Bluff? & Alien response & Putin.
The Biofield and low frequent EM field/waves.
Liberalism now lost?
Dulce, New Mexico, whistle-blower rapport by Thomas Edwin Castello.
Numbers 3, 7, 9,11,13, 33, 39.and the Free- Masons & illuminati.
Loosh, energy generated by all organic life forms.
Mad Science from Dr Mercola publication.
End of the Western Democracy and liberalism.
Links humanityandearth.com:
Banning Early Treatment Was a Crime Against Humanity?
Big Data, Transhumanism & Why the Singularity May Be Faked.
Skull and Bones Society & Thule society!
Power & greed, pushing for the economic collapse or great reset.
Forcing the New Dystopian future.
History of the human build UFO’s
Humanity being sold like cattle, agenda 21 UN.
EU Central bank, pushing for Digital currency.
energy-from-space.com links:
Use of frequencies and effects on our bio energy field that surrounds our body.
A new U.S. & Alien agreement as claimed by Israeli-Scientist?
US considering admitting working with Aliens and do research on Mars.
NWO & WHO coupe, the Alien card.
China and free energy Technology.
Free magnetic energy generator.
Tesla and wireless electricity.
Healing and Channeling device.
Big companies who brought us Toxins, food and climate changes.
Finite Element Model for Atmospheric IR-Absorption Joseph Reynen. (CO2)
“There is class war, right, but it is my class, the class of the rich, that is waging war.
Free energy and T. E. Bearden, Ph.D