NASA, would you trust them again after Mars?

Facebook :Secrets in Antarctica, please click on the link.

Tide is changing and everybody in a big rush to prepare you and me for the presence of Aliens on earth, in our seas/planets and stars! Why, what is wrong with the people in government. What do they have to hide? Who did benefited of it?

Anonymous Just Announced The TERRIFYING Truth About Antarctica!

Let have a look at our past, in add ion you find a copy of one of paper about the statement of the Pentagon chief as published by the media.

Power, Corruption and greed within the US government.

The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of life in our world, that those who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status quo.

The United States comprises large organizations – corporations, bureaucracies, “interest groups,” and the like – which are conspiratorial by nature.

That is, they are hierarchical, their important decisions are made in secret by a few key decision-makers, and they are not above lying about their activities.

Such is the nature of organizational behavior. ”Conspiracy,” in this key sense, is a way of life around the globe. Power and what does come with it very addictive.

Within the world’s military and intelligence apparatuses, this tendency is magnified to the greatest extreme. During the 1940s, the military and its scientists developed the world’s most awesome weapons in complete secrecy…

Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that official manipulation of the truth occurs daily.
But societies have their many and their few. In all times and all places, it is the few who rule, and the few who
exert dominant influence over what we may call official culture. – All elites take care to manipulate public
information to maintain existing structures of power. It’s an old game.

America is nominally a republic and free society, but in reality an empire and oligarchy, vaguely aware of its
own oppression, within and without. I have used the term “national security state” to describe its structures of power. It is a convenient way to express the military and intelligence communities, as well as the worlds that feed upon them, such as defense contractors and other underground, nebulous entities.

Its fundamental traits are secrecy, wealth, independence, power, and duplicity.

Nearly everything of significance undertaken by America’s military and intelligence community in the past
half-century has occurred in secrecy. The undertaking to build an atomic weapon, better known as the
Manhattan Project, remains the great model for all subsequent activities. For more than two years, not
a single member of Congress even knew about it although its final cost exceeded two billion dollars.

During and after the Second World War, other important projects, such as the development of biological weapons, the importation of Nazi scientists, terminal mind-control experiments, nationwide interception of mail and cable transmissions of an unwitting populace,

infiltration of the media and universities, secret coups, secret wars, and assassinations all took place far removed not only from the American public, but from most members of Congress and a few presidents.

Indeed, several of the most powerful intelligence agencies were themselves established in secrecy, unknown by the public or Congress for many years.

Since the 1940s, the US Defense and Intelligence establishment has had more money at its disposal than most nations. In addition to official dollars, much of the money is undocumented. From its beginning, the CIA was engaged in a variety of off-the-record “business” activities that generated large sums of cash.

The connections of the CIA with global organized crime (and thus de facto with the international narcotics trade) has been well established and documented for many years. – Much of the original money to run the American intelligence community came from very wealthy and established American families, who have long maintained and interest in funding national security operations important to their interests.

In theory, civilian oversight exists over the US national security establishment. The president is the military
commander-in-chief. Congress has official oversight over the CIA. The FBI must answer to the Justice Department.
In practice, little of this applies. One reason has to do with secrecy. […]

A chilling example of such independence occurred during the 1950s, when President Eisenhower effectively lost
control of the US nuclear arsenal. The situation deteriorated so much that during his final two years in office,
Eisenhower asked repeatedly for an audience with the head of Strategic Air Command to learn what America’s
nuclear retaliatory plan was. What he finally learned in 1960, his final year in office, horrified him:
half of the Northern Hemisphere would be obliterated.

If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower could not control America’s nuclear arsenal, nor get a straight answer from the Pentagon, how on earth could Presidents Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, or Nixon regarding comparable matters?

Secrecy, wealth and independence add up to power. Through the years, the national security state has gained access to the world’s most sophisticated technology, sealed off millions of acres of land from public access or scrutiny, acquired unlimited snooping ability within US borders and beyond, conducted overt or clandestine actions against other nations, and prosecuted wars without serious media scrutiny. Domestically, it maintains influence over elected officials and communities hoping for some of the billions of defense dollars.

Deception is the key element of warfare, and when winning is all that matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes an impediment. When taken together, the examples of official duplicity form a nearly single totality.

They include such choice morsels as the phony war crisis of 1948, the fabricated missile gap claimed by the air force during the 1950s, the carefully managed events leading to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution…

[S]keptics often ask, “Do you really think the government could hide [anything] for so long?”

The question itself reflects ignorance of the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the National Security
State. Actually though, the answer is yes, and no.

Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure, frequently unknown to the public for decades,
becoming public knowledge by a mere roll of the dice. But also no, in that … information has leaked out
from the very beginning. It is impossible to shut the lid completely.The key lies in neutralizing and
discrediting unwelcomed information, sometimes through official denial, other times through proxies in the media.

[E]vidence [of conspiracy] derived from a grass roots level is unlikely to survive its inevitable conflict with
official culture. And acknowledgement about the reality of [conspiracies] will only occur when the official
culture deems it worthwhile or necessary to make it. Don’t hold your breath.

This is a widespread phenomenon affecting many people, generating high levels of interest, taking place in
near-complete secrecy, for purposes unknown, by agencies unknown, with access to incredible resources and
technology. A sobering thought and cause for reflection. [Richard Dolan, UFOs and The National Security State]

Wednesday, Jun 14th 2023 6PM 17°C 9PM 15°C 5-Day Forecast

Hundreds of UFOs have been spotted ‘all over the world’, Pentagon chief admits as NASA unveils findings into first ever study of unexplained phenomena in the skies

Pentagon reveals expert ‘NASA embeds’ now cleared for classified UFO briefings
NASA astrobiologist recommends search for alien ‘artifacts’ in our solar system
FAA official asks NASA to help reduce ‘stigma’ for scientists studying UAP data
READ MORE: Military whistleblower says US has recovered ‘dead pilots’ from craft of ‘non-human origin’

By REUTERS and MATTHEW PHELAN SENIOR SCIENCE REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

4.8kshares

1.1k

View comments

Unidentified metallic orb UFOs have been spotted ‘all over the world’, a Pentagon chief admitted today during NASA’s first-ever public hearing into the phenomenon.

Physicist Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, director of the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), said: ‘We see these [‘metallic orbs’] all over the world, and we see these making very interesting apparent maneuvers.’

Dr Kirkpatrick presented AARO’s latest findings to NASA’s independent team of scientists and other experts who have been tasked with studying the UFO phenomenon — which has become increasingly less stigmatized following several high-profile congressional hearings and military sightings.

Scientists and policymakers from NASA’s independent panel also discussed their own proposed recommendations to the federal space agency, including: an active effort to remove the stigma surrounding UAP research, as well as a hunt for alien ‘artifacts’ within our solar system.

Meanwhile, it was also revealed at today’s NASA hearing that the space agency will work closely with the Pentagon’s official UFO investigators on top secret UFO cases.

Dr Kirkpatrick said that the Pentagon is closely collaborating with ‘NASA embeds,’ scientists who have been cleared for work on classified UAP cases where their expertise could help military investigators identify the mysterious craft or events.

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick describes reporting trends of UAPs

Need Text

NASA's independent UAP study group, as well as officials from both the Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration's UAP investigative teams, will present their latest UFO findings today

View gallery

NASA’s independent UAP study group, as well as officials from both the Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration’s UAP investigative teams, will present their latest UFO findings today

While playing a 2022 military UFO video taken by an MQ-9 Reaper drone in the Mid East, AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick told the NASA panel that 'We see these ['metallic orbs'] all over the world, and we see these making very interesting apparent maneuvers'

View gallery

While playing a 2022 military UFO video taken by an MQ-9 Reaper drone in the Mid East, AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick told the NASA panel that ‘We see these [‘metallic orbs’] all over the world, and we see these making very interesting apparent maneuvers’

Dr. Kirkpatrick describes UAP observed in Middle East

Need Text

TRENDING

Can YOU see it? There’s a number hidden in this red speckled image

59.2k viewing now You thought it was hot now! Experts predict the UK’s weather in 208013.1k viewing now Secret trick supermarkets use to make shoppers spend 10% MORE9.2k viewing now

Kirkpatrick added that AARO plans to deploy ‘dedicated sensors for typical UAP’ sightings, equipment independent of the existing military defense sensors that have thus far picked up UAP evidence in the course of their normal duties.

Both NASA’s head of science, the space and atmospheric physicist Dr. Nicky Fox, and AARO’s director, Dr. Kirkpatrick, also took time to rebuke unnamed individuals for harassing members of the NASA panel.

Both said that these attitudes, online and among officialdom, have contributed to the continuing social stigma surrounding UAP.

NASA UAP study group member Karlin Toner, senior advisor for data policy integration of the FAA’s Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, recommended that the space agency work to ‘make it safer to explore data’ for any scientists facing the ‘negative stigma’ surrounding UAP.

Toner suggested that the independent panel ‘consider advising NASA to more fully assess the cultural and social barriers to studying and reporting UAP,’ to effectively work hard to end the stigma on UAP research among the scientific community.

NASA, she said, should ‘implement a plan to leverage its brand image to start removing these obstacles.’

Ultimately, however, as the chair of NASA’s independent UAP panel, theoretical astrophysicist David Spergel, described it, their group’s main purpose is to answer this one question: ‘How can NASA contribute to understanding the nature of UAPs?’

He summarized the current state of data collection efforts on UAP as ‘unsystematic’ and ‘fragmented across various agencies’ often using instruments that were fit for their security or safety mandate, but ‘uncalibrated for scientific data collection.’

NASA's study group of 16 experts ranging from physicists to astronauts was formed last June to examine unclassified UFO sightings and from civilian government and commercial sectors

NASA’s study group of 16 experts ranging from physicists to astronauts was formed last June to examine unclassified UFO sightings and from civilian government and commercial sectors

AARO director Kirkpatrick presented one brand new, but resolved UAP case in which a P-3 Orion surveillance aircraft misidentified three commercial aircraft. The commercial planes were moving on an established flight corridor, but looked like a closer and weirder trio of UAP

View gallery

AARO director Kirkpatrick presented one brand new, but resolved UAP case in which a P-3 Orion surveillance aircraft misidentified three commercial aircraft. The commercial planes were moving on an established flight corridor, but looked like a closer and weirder trio of UAP

AARO's Kirkpatrick also presented fresh statistics on the Pentagon's UAP findings to the NASA panel, adding to data he first reported to the Senate's Armed Services Committee this April

View gallery

AARO’s Kirkpatrick also presented fresh statistics on the Pentagon’s UAP findings to the NASA panel, adding to data he first reported to the Senate’s Armed Services Committee this April

Spergel added that some of the work done in this realm did achieve the admirable status of ‘citizen science.’ He cited previous anomalies, like the fantastic accounts of upward-going red lightning, or sprites, which had been first reported by shocked pilots and initially discounted by atmospheric scientists.

‘If it’s something that’s anomalous. That makes it interesting and worthy of study,’ Spergel said.

Five legendary UFO sightings that still puzzle observers

UFOs — or UAPs, as they’re now being called — have enjoyed a renaissance in recent years, but their sightings have been reported for decades.

But study group member Mike Gold, NASA’s former associate administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships, went even further.

Gold, currently with the private space infrastructure firm Redwire, called on the agency to institute ‘a permanent office within NASA to support this activity’ the serious study of UAP.

NASA’s study group, an assemblage of 16 experts ranging from physicists to astronauts, was formed last June to examine unclassified UFO sightings and other data collected from civilian government and commercial sectors.

The study group represents the first such inquiry ever conducted by the US space agency into a subject the government had previously consigned to the purview of military and national security officials, when accorded respect or attention at all.

Today, these parallel NASA and Pentagon efforts, both undertaken with some semblance of transparency, mark a turning point for in the government’s public stance on UFOs or UAP.

After decades spent deflecting, debunking and discrediting sightings of unidentified flying objects, or UFOs, dating back to the 1940s, Pentagon officials now say that their recent push to investigate such sightings has led to hundreds of new reports that are under examination.

Speaking to the NASA panel today, AARO director Kirkpatrick said that roughly 2 to 5 percent of AARO’s current database of approximately 800 UAP cases constituted real and baffling anomalies.

Kirkpatrick’s report, as well as a presentation by an advisor to the Federal Aviation Administration’s Air Traffic Surveillance Services Office, Mike Freie, constituted the first major presentations during today’s public panel by NASA’s UAP study group.

While NASA’s science mission was seen by some as promising a more open-minded approach to a topic long treated as taboo by the defense establishment, the US space agency made it known from the start that it was hardly leaping to any conclusions.

‘There is no evidence UAPs are extraterrestrial in origin,’ NASA said in announcing the panel’s formation last June.

In its more recent statements, the agency presented a new potential wrinkle to the UAP acronym itself, referring to it as an abbreviation for ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena.’ This suggested that sightings other than those that appeared airborne may be included.

Still, NASA in announcing Wednesday’s meeting, said the space agency defines UAPs ‘as observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena from a scientific perspective.’

There were indications, however, that NASA may expand its interest in the subject far beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

One member of the panel, astrobiologist David Grinspoon, an advisor to NASA on space exploration strategy, offered much more cosmic recommendations than his peers during today’s public meeting.

Grinspoon noted that he and his colleagues’ search for ‘biosignatures’ and ‘technosignatures’ of extraterrestrial life out in the wider universe could play a significant role by assisting and collaborating with the investigation of local UAP.

‘While at present there is no evidence suggesting an extraterrestrial source for UAPs,’ Grinspoon said, ‘these existing NASA programs are relevant to the question.’

Grinspoon told the panel that it would be ‘plausible’ to find ‘extraterrestrial artifacts’ made by an alien civilization in our solar system. NASA, he said, should include attempts to search and identify any such artifacts in future planetary exploration missions.

The Pentagon whistleblower who claims the US has run a top-secret UFO retrieval program for decades says some of the ‘non-human intelligence’ discovered are malevolent and have even killed humans. David Grusch served 14 years in the Air Force, where he says he was told about the program by others who were involved.

Grusch, 36, is a decorated Afghanistan combat officer who went on to work for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). His role was to act as the NRO’s representative when dealing with the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force. The task force was specifically set up to investigate UFOs.

Over the last week, he has gone public with what he says it entailed, telling NewsNation about how the US is in an arms race with Russia and China to understand extra-terrestrial life. In his most recent comments, he says the ‘non-human’ intelligence has acted with malevolence – and even killed some humans.

‘I think the logical fallacy there is because they’re advanced, they’re kind. We’ll never really understand their full intent and that’s because we’re not them. But I think what appears to be malevolent activity has happened. That’s based on nuclear site probing activities and witness testimony. While I can’t get into the specifics because that would reveal certain US classified operations, I was briefed by a few individuals on the program that there were malevolent events like that,’ he said when asked specifically if any had killed humans. ‘

Grusch also made the astonishing claim that the US government would do anything to protect the secret – including killing people themselves. ‘At the very least, I saw substantive evidence that white-collar crime was committed…unfortunately. I’ve heard some really un-American things I don’t want to repeat right now,’ he said.

He claimed some of the UFOs discovered have been as large as football fields. Another military veteran also told sources that his six-man unit saw a hovering UFO being loaded with weapons while he was serving in Indonesia. Others say they have encountered aircraft that can distort space and time.

Grusch filed his report in July last year. At the time, the Intelligence Community Inspector General called the complaint ‘urgent and credible.’

‘There is a sophisticated disinformation campaign targeting the U.S. populace which is extremely unethical and immoral,’ he said, accusing the US government of lying to the public for ‘decades’. ‘We are most definitely not alone,’ he said, adding that ‘quite a number’ of aircraft have been discovered.

The Pentagon denied having any knowledge of the program described by Grusch last week, but said it would follow ongoing investigations into his claims ‘wherever they lead’. The House Oversight Committee also says it will investigate his claims.