Document URL: http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/nwo.htm http://www.100777.com/nwo/05.htm
“We are the Borg. Resistance is futile. Your culture will adapt to service us.
I received this over the internet last year. It is not too late to stop them, yet, but it soon will be.
Please print this out for the majority who don’t have computers, and give it to as many people as you can.
Everyone on Earth should read this and it will never get into the papers, for the reasons stated in it, that is
why everyone should make as many copies as they can and pass them on. How else will people be able to read it?
If everyone does their bit we can inform the world and set the wheels of redemption in motion.
Peace be upon you,
We are the Borg or more accurate the collectivist implementing the Alien agenda or NWO as you know it.
Resisting is futile. YOUR VAIN RESISTANCE
When any of you seek to resist us, we have ways of making you look ridiculous as we have done with your militia movement. We have delighted to use this movement to show the world how impotent any resistance is.
They look so silly marching around with their guns as if they were some match for our military.
Look at what we did near Waco. Did the Davidian’s little store of weapons help them? We have generously taxed you and used that money to make such sophisticated weapons you can in no way compete. Your own money has served to forge the chains we bind you with, since we are in control of all money.
[And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell-fire.
- Matthew 10:28]
Some of you think you may escape by buying some land in the country and growing a garden. Let me remind you that you still pay us ground rent. Oh, you may call it property taxes, but it still goes to us. You see, you need money no matter what you do. If you fail to pay your ground rent to us, we will take your land and sell it to someone who will pay us. Do you think we cannot do this?
And with your ground rent we pay for the indoctrination of your children in the public schools we have set up.
We want them to grow up well trained into the system of our thinking. Your children will learn what we want them to learn, when we want them to learn it, and you pay for it through your ground rent.
Those funds are also used for other projects we have in mind and our contractors are paid handsomely for their work. You may doubt that we own your children, or have such control, but you will find that we do.
We can declare that you abuse your children when you spank them and have them confiscated.
If they do not show up for school indoctrination, we can accuse you of neglect, thereby, giving them to us.
Your children are not yours. They are ours. You must inoculate them, you must bring them to our hospitals if we decree or we will take them from you. You know this and we know this.
Through our electronic commerce we are able to see where you are, what you are buying and how much you have to buy things with. Where do you suppose we come up with our monthly financial statistics? Through the Internet and other sources we can even know how you think and what you say. It is not especially important to us what you believe as long as you do what we say. Your beliefs are nonsense anyway*. But if you think you have a following, and we perceive that you might be somewhat dangerous to our agenda, we have ways to deal with you.
[* Here is where the NWO’s weakness lies their dis-belief in God and His Infinite Power is the root of their
arrogance and complacency.
“Don’t under-estimate The Force. The ability to destroy a planet (weapons of “mass destruction”, etc.)
is insignificant next to The Power of The Force (God’s Powers)” Please read the “Starwars, fact not fiction”
booklet at http://i.am/jah/starwar.htm for a more detailed explanation of this statement.]
We have a Pandora’s box of mischief with which to snare you. We can have you in court so long you will never get out. We can easily drain away all your assets over one pretext or another. We have an inexhaustible fund with which to draw from to pay our lawyers. These lawyers are paid by you in the form of taxes.
You do not have this vast supply of wealth. We know how to divide and conquer. Have we not brought down rulers of countries through our devices? Do you think your tiny self will be any match for us?
[ When his disciples heard [it], they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved?
But Jesus beheld [them], and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
- Matthew 19:25-26
And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation;
and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand. – Matthew 12:25]
This Awareness indicates on the more global level, it is an effort to create a One World Government that is capable of controlling all levels of society through the manipulations of individuals through their ability to buy and sell, and also through the control of health care and through the education and mind controls available to them through various electronic devices and media, and also through the microscopic chips that will eventually be implanted, into every person’s hand or forehead as mentioned in the Book of Revelation.
A Covenant with Death by Bill Cooper
“We have been taught lies. Reality is not at all what we perceive it to be.”
“We cannot survive any longer by hanging onto the falsehoods of the past. Reality must be discerned at all costs if we are to be a part of the future.
Truth must prevail in all instances, no matter who it hurts or helps, if we are to continue to live upon this
earth. At this point, what we want may no longer matter. It is what we must do to ensure our survival that counts.
The old way is in the certain process of destruction and a New World Order is beating down the door… “
seek the truth
The New World Order
Quote … unquote
The mention of the New World Order in polite conversation will provoke accusations of paranoia – yet politicians, financiers and writers discuss it openly.
“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995) That quotation and the following – and many others like them – clearly demonstrate that the words “new world order” are not only deadly serious, but implemented by force if needed and furthermore, have been in devellopment/use for decades.
“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright l nights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The “old world order” is one based on independent nation-states. The “new world order” involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government.
This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S.
Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the “new world order” differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot].
Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside
threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated [emphasis mine], that
threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil.
The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be
willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
“The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.” Myron Fagan
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation.”
David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”
Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950
“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order.'” Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)
“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.
“An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”
U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917
“The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a
New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” George Herbert Walker Bush
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority.
National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
“The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi-occult power which….pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.”
British military historian Major General J.F.C. Fuller, l941
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby,
the New Generation
“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. “
British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
“What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.”
Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920
“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….
At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.”
New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922
“From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century.
And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.”
Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.
“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.
“The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.
“The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….
The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952 “Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.”
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.
“Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.”
Senator William Jenner, 1954
“The case for government by elites is irrefutable.”
Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?
“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial
and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral
Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.”
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.”
Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.
“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.”
Former Congressman John Rarick 1971
“The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the
Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation.” The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961
“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”
CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.
“The planning of UN can be traced to the ‘secret steering committee’ established by Secretary [of State Cordell]
Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee
politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and
guide the labors of the [State] Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department’s postwar planning.”
Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, “Imperial Brain Trust:
The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.” (Monthly Review Press, 1977).
“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
Harpers, July l958
“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such
fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.”
Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915
“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.”
M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a
subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete
understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.”
Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people …
will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)
“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty.
The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,
‘ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.”
Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member
without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved
an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.”
Excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in The New York Times (October 1940)
“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves.
If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals,
wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.”
The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the
Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.
“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor”
Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)
“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of
anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and
the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.”
Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (1942)
“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new
world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.”
American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)
“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be
briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood,
suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a
new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.”
Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)
“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E.
Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he
would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has
established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.”
Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)
“Alchemy for a New World Order”
Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)
“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape
a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic,
military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the
leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty
truly meaningful through the federal approach.'” Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled
“Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” —
The New York Times (February 1962)
“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and
loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a
new world order.” Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)
“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future
contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace
and building ‘a new world order.'” Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)
“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide
the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to
complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up
a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the
end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or
adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-
case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the
top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of
reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than
the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert
a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a
new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth
pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.”
Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” in the
book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)
“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity,
that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber.
Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”
Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)
“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order.”
Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)
“A New World Order” Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H.
Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)
“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards
a new world order.”
Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)
“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet
Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)
“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work
together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision
for peace for the post-war period.”
Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness
will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision
we’ve all worked toward for so long.”
President George Bush (January 1991)
“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence
of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a
team through the U.N. Security Council.”
Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)
“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in
the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax
Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.”
George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 1991)
“… it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root;
F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.”
William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)
“How I Learned to Love the New World Order”
Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)
“How to Achieve The New World Order”
Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)
“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.”
Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)
“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State”
Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)
“The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.”
Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)
“The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.”
President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)
One World Order supporters….
“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions,
begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (administrations), too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan of reducing us to slavery.”
“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East
and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government’….National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…” Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”
President George Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1,1992.
“…This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”
Senator Joseph S. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate, March 1, 1962, about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever.
“Let me control a peoples currency and I care not who makes their laws…”
Meyer Nathaniel Rothchild in a speech to a gathering of world bankers February 12, 1912.The following year, we subscribed to the “services” of the newly incorporated Federal Reserve, headed by Mr. Rothchild.
“By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations … a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival.
One world government is inevitable.”
Pope John Paul II quoted by Malachi Martin in the book “The Keys of This Blood”
“The New World Order is a world that has a supernational authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an
international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency
that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and Communist
nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order.”
Former West German Chancellor, Willy Brandt, former chairman of the Fifth-Socialist International, who chaired
the Brandt Commission in the late 1980s.
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept
the New World Order.”
“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be
built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our
hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.”
David Rockefeller, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994.
“A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.”
Brent Scowcroft, George Bush’s National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War.
“The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)…Out of
these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its
President George Bush, September 11, 1990.
“The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a
New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of
President George Bush in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991.
“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order.”
Henry Kissinger when campaigning for the passage of NAFTA.
“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a
new world order.”
Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988.
“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in “Foreign Affairs,” July/August 1995.
“…In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down.
It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but
an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-
fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very
great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people –
will hate the new world order – and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise,
we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and
H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939).
“Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally
Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, to Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.
“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights,
giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans… and so a lot of people say there’s too much
personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the
announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and
more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities.”
President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”
“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…”
Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)
“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient
and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment
in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”
David Rockefeller, statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)
“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days
is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.”
Charles Austin Beard (1874-1948)
“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to
attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise.
The Western world will need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement
on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and
decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends.
As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.”
Dmitrii Z. Manuilskii (Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931)
“There is no reason for anyone in this country, anyone except a police officer or a military person, to buy, to
own, to have, to use a handgun….And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution.”
Michael Gartner, 1992 in USA Today
“The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.”
H. J. Res. 438Introduced by Rep. Major Owens, 1992
Vice President Al Gore traveled to Marrakech, Morocco, in April for the signing of the new world trade agreement.
Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied ‘no fly’ zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down
two U.S. helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. ‘I want to extend condolences,’ Gore said,
‘to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations.'”
(Los Angeles Times, 6/12/94)
“There is nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine . . . been here 4 1/2 billion years. We’ve been here,
what, a 100,000 years, maybe 200,000. And we’ve only been engaged in heavy industry a little over 200 years.
200 years versus 4 1/2 billion. And we have the conceit to think that somehow we’re a threat? The planet isn’t
going away. We are.”
“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and
abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”
H. L. Mencken
“Nuclear power must be dealt with irrationally. . . . Nuclear plants are carcinogens. Let’s get that story out. . .
. Their lies will catch up to them. We need endless Chernobyl reminders.”
Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” Lyall Watson, The Financial
Times, 15 July 1995
“‘Protecting the Environment’ is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the
few, under the guise of preserving nature.”
J. H. Robbins
“…the only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can’t let other countries
have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these
Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they
don’t suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them.”
Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
“The necessary consequence of an egalitarian program is the decidedly inegalitarian creation of a ruthless power
M. N. Rothbard
Global Sustainability requires: “the deliberate quest of poverty . . . reduced resource consumption . . . and set
levels of mortality control.”
Professor Maurice King
“Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweighs the risks is absolutely
anathema to the environmental community.”
Janet Hathaway, Natural Resources Defense Council
“The Environmentalist’s Dream is an Egalitarian Society based on: rejection of economic growth, a smaller
population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources
much more equally.”
“A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.
Richard Benedict, State Dept. employee working on assignment from the Conservation Foundation
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy . . . would be the equivalent o f giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
“The secret to David McTaggart’s (early officer in Greenpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace’s success:
It doesn’t matter what is true . . . . it only matters what people believe is true . . . .
You are what the media decides.
(with added details of THE ONLY WAY to DEFEAT the NWO and bring True and Lasting Peace and Justice to Planet
*The original letter (in plain text) was received from an American contact and has not been altered in any way,
it purports to come from a New World Order elitist. All notes and references in italics have been added later.
Dearest Citizen of the World,
State secrets are fully known to us. China recently accused the media in the U.S. of lying about Kosovo.
Oh, you silly people, of course we lie*. In this way we can keep the people unbalanced and always facing
controversy which is very helpful to us. Have you not seen the talk show spectacle? Some of you believe we
are the liberals and the good people are the conservatives. In reality, both serve our purposes. Each camp merely
serves with the stamp of our approval but they are not allowed to present the real issues.
By creating controversy on all levels, no one knows what to do. So, in all of this confusion, we go ahead and
accomplish what we want with no hindrance.
[ * Ye are of [YOUR] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh
of his own: for he is a liar, and the father (inventor) of it. – John 8:35]
Consider the President of the United States. Even though he regularly breaks every known check on his power, no
one can stop him. He goes ahead and does whatever we want him to do anyway. The Congress has no power to stop him.
He does what we want since he knows if he does not, because of his rather dark character, we can have him removed
in a moment’s time. Is not that a rather brilliant strategy on our part? You cannot take us to court because you
can’t see us and the courts are our servants as well. We run everything, yet, you do not know who to attack.
I must say this hidden hand is wonderfully devised and without any known historical precedent on this scale.
We rule the world and the world cannot even find out who is ruling them.
[ Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of His might.
Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil (and his advocates
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the
darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].
Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God**, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having
done all, to stand.
- Ephesians 6:10-13]
This is truly a wonderful thing. In our media we present before you exactly what it is we want you to do.
Then, as if in a flash, our little servants obey. We can send American or European troops to wherever we like,
whenever we like, and for whatever purpose we like, and you dutifully go about our business. How much more
evidence do you need? We can make you desire to leave your homes and family and go to war merely at our command.
We only need to present some nonsense to you from the president’s desk or on the evening news and we can get you
all fired up to do whatever we like. You can do nothing but what we put before you.
YOUR VAIN ORGANIZATIONS
And, let us consider your religions and the “moral majority.” The “moral majority” is neither moral nor is it in
the majority. We have delighted to use this wet noodle of a movement to make ridiculous the Christian faith.
The silly men who run that organization always end up with egg on their faces*. We have always put them in defense
of themselves as we have so successfully done with the NRA. We can make it seem by our media propaganda that the
National Rifle Association is actually the New Radical Attackers.
[ * Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the
ditch (or Pit). – Matthew 15:14]
Have we not turned the American conservative movement on its ear? If it serves our purposes we can use the
conservatives to turn the liberals on their ear. It makes no difference to us but it serves to make you believe
there are two sides struggling for their particular position. This helps to make things seem fair and free since
everyone has a voice. Actually, there is only one side now with all kinds of masks on, but you are unable to
penetrate our purposes.
You see, we can do whatever we like and you can do nothing about it. Does it not seem reasonable that you simply
obey and serve us?* Otherwise, you get eaten up in the resistance you suppose will liberate you.
[ * Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and showeth him all the kingdoms of the world,
and the glory of them;
And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him
ONLY shalt thou serve.
Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.
- Matthew 4:8-11]
You cannot be liberated. Imagine how you can. We supply your fuel for your cars. We can turn it off whenever we
like claiming that there is some sort of fuel shortage. What if your car breaks down? You cannot get parts for
it without us. We supply all the money you use. At any whim of our desire we can stop the money supply or cause
a complete crash all together. We can then order the president to declare all money worthless and that we will
have to have new money. All of your stashes of cash will go up in smoke in a moment’s time.
Don’t you need food? If necessary, we can cause a trucker’s strike which would stop deliveries of food to your
local store. We can starve you whenever we like. You only have food because we have provided it to you from our
During the great depression we controlled the food. We heaped mountains of food behind fences and let it rot.
The hungry were then made to work in our labour camps even though there was enough and more to feed them.
Do you really think you can beat us? You say you will hoard gold coins so you will still have money in the
time of the crash. We can simply pass a law which outlaws the possession of gold as we have done in the past.
If we find gold in your possession, we would simply confiscate it and put you in prison for breaking the law.
While in prison you would be required to work in one of our prison industries. We have so formed a picture of
the labour camps in our prisons these days that no one seems to object to them. We tell people that murderers
should pay for their own keep.
No one seems to consider that we have the power to put tomato growers there also. We can pass laws that prohibit
gardens and then make up some scientific reason why you may only buy food from our sources. If someone sees you
growing tomatoes, they will report you to us and then we will have you in our fields working for us. Oh, silly
nationalists, there is no escape for you, for since long before you were born, we were planning your capture.
Your teachers and ministers have been forming your thoughts for us for generations now. You have no idea how to
pull out of our influence short of suicide. Go ahead and commit suicide, it will only help us to deal with the
excessive population. You cannot hurt us, find us, or even imagine what we are up to.
I am throwing you these few crumbs only so that you may, if you have a little good sense, obey and follow our
[And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.
For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these
But rather seek ye the Kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the Kingdom.
- Luke 12:29-32]
YOUR CONTROLLED MIND
We run Hollywood. The movies such as Terminator and Armageddon, along with a great host of others, were simply
created to get you thinking according to our directions. You have been made to delight in violence so that when
we send you off to kill some bad man we have put before you, you move without a whimper.
We have placed violent arcade games in your malls to prepare your young minds in the art of battle. We have
made you to view our armies and police as the good forces and you submit to things that were unthinkable just
a few decades ago. Our artful programs, are all designed to help you submit and even help the New World Order.
Star Trek, and other such creations, have taught you to simply obey orders from the new international rulers.
Oh, silly people, you thought you were being entertained, while you were actually being educated. Dare I use
the words, “brainwashed” or “mind control?” By the way, have you seen the new Star Wars?
What a masterpiece of mental manipulation. Humans confer with nondescript beasts of all shapes and sizes and
they confer in English. I wonder where those space beasts learned English. Oh, the simpleness of the mind of
the citizen. He never considers he is being taken into fairyland. We have placed advertisements for Star Wars
almost everywhere you go. You will find them in Wal-Mart, K-Mart, Taco Bell and a host of our institutions of
commerce. There is something we want you to learn from this movie. Or, perhaps it could be said, there is
something we do not want you to learn, from Episodes 4-6. Either way, we will have what we want in the whole
[For a full explanation of, and the reason why “they” don’t want you to learn from episodes 4-6 of the Starwars
films, please study the “Starwars, fact not fiction” Booklet at http://i.am/jah/starwar.htm or send £1 Sterling
or $2 US plus postage, for a printed copy of it, to the address at the end of this article.]
Of course, to keep you off guard we have instructed our elected officials to appear to be correcting the evil
of our violence. President Clinton is now speaking against violence in Hollywood movies. This will not solve
the problem, but will only make the people believe the problem is being worked on. Sex and violence are the
very best powers to use to help us gain our advantage. How the people loathe to give up their sex and violence,
so we place all they want before them. In this way, we keep them so occupied they do not have the integrity or
brain power to deal with the really important matters which are left entirely in our hands.
President Clinton has been very helpful to us. We knew of what character he was before we placed him as president.
Exposing him was very helpful in adjusting the moral habits of the youth downward. This is to our advantage.
Even more agreeable to us were the vain efforts of those who thought they could remove him against our will.
He is useful to us and he will not be removed by anyone until we are ready to have him removed.
Excuse me if I seem to be mocking your system of beliefs, but they are rather outdated. Have you no eyes to see
your vain liberties and your righteous pontifications are nothing before us? You can only do what we say you can
do. We remove presidents when we are ready and the leader we set up will be there until it serves us to have
At that time we place our proposed leader before you and you vote for what we want. In that way we give you
the vain voting exercise in the belief you had something to do with placing your president in office.
We use the nations for what we want to use them for. Everyone knows that they must yield to us or die.
Fortunately, we have had a few resisters such as Saddam and Milosevic that have been helpful in showing
the world leaders what we will do to them if they do not submit.
There is only glory in following our purposes and doing what we say. If one does not, there will be such
a sad and tragic result. I would really have you spared of such an end. But, then, again, if you are not spared,
it is of no consequence to us. We will use you to alleviate some of the overpopulation problem.
YOUR SILLY REBELLION AGAINST OUR DOMINION
Some of you have thought you could stop us by placing a bomb in one of our abortion clinics or in a government
building. Silly souls! How can that hurt us?
All that does is give us an example to use so that we might place more controls and heavy burdens on the
population. We love it when you rebel and blow something up. You are our reason for making more laws against
all those things which might contribute to your freedom from us. If someone did not blow something up on occasion,
we would have no justification in placing more hedges about you. Can’t you see how impossible it is for you to
resist us? The more you wriggle, the more we squeeze.
[ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
But I say unto you, Do not resist evil (with evil): but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheeck, turn to
him the other also (and thereby neutralize the evil with good).
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloak also. – Matthew 5:38-40]
Our kingdom is the kingdom of money. Excuse me, but I must confess that we are the rulers of the kingdom of
non-money. You must see the humour in that statement. We have given you a piece of paper or some numbers on a
computer screen that we have termed money. It is backed up by nothing and proven by nothing but what we say it is. We create it from nothing, we print it, we loan it, we give it its value, we take its value away. All things that have to do with money are in our hands. Think of it, what is it that you can do against us without money? If you try to resist, we can cancel your credit or freeze your accounts. Your cash is easily confiscated. We have made so many rules in the realm of living that you cannot live without money.
Camp on government land and you must move in two weeks. You cannot grow much of a garden in two weeks.
Many of our wilderness trails are entered by permit only. We have passed laws that do not allow you to
live in trailers over a certain period without moving to another location. Have you not thought it ridiculous
that we will allow a man to live in a box full time but we will not allow a man to live in an RV full time unless
he is in a taxpaying campground?
[Please study Matthew chapter 23 in its completeness for Christ’s opinion of all lawyers, politicians and priests
of every denomination.]
OUR UNFATHOMABLE MYSTERIES
Our recent war in Serbia has many purposes to it but we do not speak of these things openly.
We let the talk show hosts blather all sorts of nonsense but none of it touches the core. First of all, there is
a wealth of natural resources in Kosovo that we must have complete control of. Kosovo has large supplies of
uranium in its soil and uranium is very helpful to our regime. Also, it suits us to keep all such minerals out
of the hands of potential enemies.
Milosevic has not been helpful in giving those resources into our hands so we simply make things difficult for
him until he does. Even now victory over Yugoslavia is imminent.
We are reducing that proud nation to the level of humility we require from all people. After the war, if Mr.
Milosevic does not sufficiently humble himself, we will take him to the world court charged with war crimes.
We made up that term; rather ingenious, don’t you think? How could there be such a thing as a war crime?
The very nature of war is that the rules are off. It is so entertaining to watch the nations try to fight
war according to the laws we have placed before them. The only war crime there really is only involves the
crime of being against us. Anyone against us is violating our law. As you have seen when someone is for us
we do not care what they do. Was not Nelson Mandela a bomb-toting terrorist who killed many of his enemies?
We made a hero of him.
We observe no laws when it comes to war. We do what we want, when we want and where we want.
We can starve nations to death, we can ruin civilians and any other horror for which we would take our enemies
to court. Look at our example.
We bomb Serbia out of its wits, bomb Kosovans out of their homes, poison their rivers and streams, turn off
their electricity making a grand crisis in that country, and then we masterfully make it appear it is all
Mr. Milosevic’s fault and he needs to go to court for it. It is the same way we made our inferno at Waco look
like Mr. Koresh’s fault. Then there was our chief villain, Saddam with all of his weapons of mass destruction.
Bad men are a dime a dozen and we can conjure one up whenever it suits us. This is really quite funny when you
think of it. I am not one who is usually given to humour, but I do catch myself laughing sometimes at the
absolute absurdity of the notions we place before you and you readily accept.
Do you wonder that the leaders of the world tremble at our presence? They know they have no power except the
power we give them. We have no fear of Russia or China for we are already in full control of their system of
things. China knows that we can freeze any number of its corporations in America and all of its capital at the
stroke of a pen.
We want you to be in the system. When you are buying a house, we not only receive the tax revenue to use for our
purposes, but we gain large increases from the interest on the loan. You may pay for your house two or three
times over from the interest alone. The interest is also taxed which is again placed for use in those sectors
of influence we choose.
We do not want you to escape free and that is why we have made it as we have. You are our property.
We will not permit you to buy or sell unless you submit to our mark of authority*. If you go to court against us,
we will wear you out there and in the end you will lose. If you use violence, we will end up having you in one of
our labour camps, more specifically called prison industries. You need our money, our entertainments, our fuel,
and our utilities to function and if you don’t have them, you feel deprived. By this, you are made to yield to our
- And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand,
or in their foreheads:
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast (system), or the number of
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of man
(created 6th day); and its number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six (man, man, man).
- Revelation 13:16-18
[No author’s signature attached]