The carbon dioxide scam now exposed?

Carbon Dioxide — The Gas of Life !

Climate hysteria:

“In spite of incontrovertible arguments that there is no climate emergency — CO2 is good for the Earth — the campaign to banish CO2, ‘net zero,’ has been very successful. So, how can that be? I’m really out of my depth here because now I’m talking about human nature. I’m really good with instruments and with solving differential equations but I’m not very good at understanding human beings.

But here are some of the drivers: noble lies, political lies, ignorance, stupidity, greed. Noble lies goes back to Plato who discusses it in ‘The Republic.’ ‘In politics, a noble lie is a myth or untruth, often, but not invariably of a religious nature, knowingly propagated by an elite to maintain social harmony or to advance an agenda.’

And here there’s a clear agenda. If you could somehow unite mankind to fight some external threat, for example CO2 pollution, then we won’t fight each other. There won’t be wars. So, I think many sincere people have latched on to the CO2 narrative partly for that reason. You can actually read about it in the early writings of the Club of Rome.

Then there are political lies. This is one my favorite H.L. Menken quotes: ‘The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.’”

Ignorance, of course, is widespread, and largely based on incomplete knowledge or a flawed understanding of the facts. And what of stupidity? Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the few German clergymen who opposed Hitler and eventually paid for his public dissent with his life, once wrote about human stupidity:

“Against stupidity we have no defense. Neither protest nor force can touch it. Reasoning is of no use. Facts that contradict personal prejudices can simply be disbelieved — indeed, the fool can counter by criticizing them, and if they are undeniable, they can just be pushed aside as trivial exceptions.

So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied. In fact, they can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make them aggressive. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one.”

Happer himself has experienced the danger of opposing stupidity. “I regularly get phone calls threatening me, my wife and children with death,” he says. “So, what kind of movement is this?” Lastly, greed. A.S. Pushkin once said, “If there should happen to be a trough, there will be pigs.” And climate science is currently where the big bucks are — provided your work furthers the global warming narrative and the need for net zero emissions.

Whatever the drivers are, responsible people everywhere need to push back against the false climate change narrative and the net zero agenda, as it will accomplish nothing in terms of normalizing temperatures, but will rapidly erode quality of life and the sustainability of food production, and shift wealth into the hands of the few.

https://youtu.be/tXJ7UZjFDHU

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola/January 27, 2024

Please click here the video link.

Next

How Sun Exposure Improves Your Immune Function

What We’ve Learned From Hundreds of Vaccine Shedding Reports

https://articles.mercola.com/themes/blogs/mercola/VideoPanel.aspx?PostID=1364964&v=20240127&CacheVideo=1

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) is commonly mischaracterized as a harmful waste product of respiration and is falsely blamed for disrupting the planetary climate
  • CO2 is an essential gas necessary for life. Moreover, its impact on Earth’s temperatures is negligible, and will remain negligible even if the current concentration in the atmosphere were to double. A 100% increase of CO2, from 400 ppm to 800 ppm, would decrease radiation into space by just 1.1%, resulting in a 0.7 degree C increase of the average earth temperature
  • A 0.7 degree C difference means there’s no climate emergency, and no matter what we do to reduce CO2 emissions, it’s not going to impact global temperatures. To fabricate an emergency where there is none, it is assumed that massive positive feedbacks are involved. However, most natural feedbacks are negative, not positive, so isn’t it likely the 0.7 degree C increase is an overestimation to begin with
  • There’s no single temperature of the Earth. It varies by location and altitude. For every kilometer of altitude, you have an average cooling of 6.6 degrees C
  • Higher CO2 levels will green the planet, making it more hospitable to plant life. The more CO2 there is, the better plants and trees grow. CO2 also reduces the water needs of plants, reducing the risks associated with droughts

The video above, “CO2, The Gas of Life,” features a lecture given at the Summit Old Guard Meeting in New Jersey, October 3, 2023, by William Happer, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of physics at Princeton University and former scientific adviser to the Bush and Trump administrations.

The topic: carbon dioxide (CO2), commonly mischaracterized as a harmful waste product of respiration and a pollutant that is disrupting the planetary climate. As explained by Happer in this lecture, CO2 is actually an essential gas necessary for life. Moreover, its impact on Earth’s temperatures is negligible, and will remain negligible even if the current concentration in the atmosphere were to double.

CO2 Is Not a Pollutant

At present, the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere at a few thousand feet of elevation is around 430 parts per million (ppm). Closer to the ground, concentrations vary widely, both by location and time of day. This is because ground-level readings are impacted by photosynthesis and the respiration of insects and the like.

In the room where Happer was giving his lecture, the CO2 reading was 1,800 ppm — the result of having a large group of people breathing in a closed space. Air conditioning systems have CO2 meters that turn on fans to bring outdoor air inside when levels get too high.

The question of what is too high is an important one, considering The Great Resetters are pushing a green agenda that demands the dismantling of energy infrastructure and farming in the name of stopping climate change, which quite obviously threatens our quality of life and food supply. Ultimately, it may threaten human existence altogether.

The fact of the matter is that CO2 is not the “bad guy” it’s made out to be, and the “net zero” agenda is wholly inappropriate if maintaining life on Earth is part of the equation.

“CO2 is a very essential and natural part of life,” Happer says. “It is the gas of life. We’re made of carbon after all, mostly carbon, and we breathe out a lot of CO2 a day just by living. Each of us breathes out about 2 pounds of CO2 a day. Multiply that by 8 billion people and 365 days a year, and just [by] living, people are a non-negligible part of the CO2 budget of the Earth.

Nevertheless, we are living through a crusade against so-called pollutant CO2. People talk about carbon pollution. [But] every one of us is polluting Earth by breathing, [so] if you want to stop polluting … apparently God wants us to commit suicide …

We’re doing all sorts of crazy things because of this alleged pollutant … more and more beautiful meadows are being covered with black solar panels. It doesn’t work very well; it doesn’t work at all at night. It doesn’t work on cloudy days. It doesn’t work terribly well in the middle of the winter because of the angle of the sun.

But nevertheless we’re doing it. We’re being misled into climate hysteria, and if you haven’t read this book, I highly recommend it. It was published first in 1841, called ‘Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds.’ It’s as relevant today as it was then …

I’m a physicist. I’m proud to say that no one could call me a climate scientist, but I know a lot about climate and I was a coauthor of one of the first books on the effects of carbon dioxide 41 years ago. This was a study done by the Jason Group which I was a member of. I was chairman for a while and it had really good people there.”

Long-Term Impact of Increasing Atmospheric CO2

The key question when it comes to global warming is, how much do you warm the Earth if you double the atmospheric CO2 concentration? This is called the climate sensitivity question. The GUESS is that doubling CO2 would result in a 3-degree centigrade rise in the global temperature.

“It was not based on any hard calculations,” Happer says. “It was because of group-think. That’s what everybody else thought, and so that’s what we thought. Now, in my defense, one of the reasons I didn’t pay much attention to this [is because] I was working on something at this time that I thought was much more important. So, let me tell you about that, so you get a feeling for why I think I’m qualified to pontificate about this subject.

It was the beginning of the Strategic Defense Initiative, of Star Wars … President Reagan … wanted some way to defend the United States so that we didn’t have to have this mass suicide pact, and among other things we considered using high-powered lasers to burn up incoming missiles …

But here’s the problem. If you take the 1 megawatt laser on the ground and you send it toward the missile, by the time it gets to the missile, the beam — instead of focusing all the power on the missile — breaks up into hundreds of sub beams — speckles — and this was something that was well-known to astronomers. You have the same problem when you’re looking at distant stars and galaxies.

Astronomers knew how to fix this … If you can measure how much this wave is bent, then you can bounce it off a mirror bent in the opposite direction, and when the wave bounces up it’s absolutely flat. That’s called adaptive optics and it works beautifully. Then, when you focus the corrected beam, you get a single spot instead of hundreds of [beams].

The trouble with that is that if you look at the night sky, there are only four or five stars that are bright enough to have enough photons to do the measurement of the distortion of the wave. So, we had a classified meeting in the summer of 1982. There were a number of Air Force officers there who explained the problem. By chance, I knew how to solve it.

You can make an artificial star anywhere in the sky by shining a laser tuned to the sodium frequency onto the layer of sodium above our heads, at 90 to 100 kilometers.”

While the Air Force was initially dubious about there being a sodium layer in the atmosphere, they did eventually build the sodium laser proposed by Happer, and if you go to any ground-based telescope today, you’ll usually see one or two of them. Anyway, that story was simply to impress you with the fact that Happer knows what he’s talking about when it comes to atmospheric constituents and their related phenomena.

Download this Article Before it Disappears

Download PDF

CO2 Has No Discernible Impact on Earth Temperatures

According to the climate alarmists, rising CO2 will result in global warming that will threaten all life on earth. In actuality, however, CO2 “is a very puny tool to do anything to the climate,” Happer says.

Keep in mind that there’s no single temperature on the Earth. It varies by location and altitude. For every kilometer of altitude, you have an average cooling of 6.6 degrees C. This is known as the lapse rate. That cooling continues up to the troposphere, where it stops.

The cooling is due to the fact that warm air rises and cool air descends. “It’s the convection that sets that rapid drop of temperatures — 6-and-a-half degrees per kilometer,” Happer says. He then explains the following graph, which details the thermal radiation to space from the Earth, assuming a surface temperature of 15.5 degrees C. The greenhouse gases is the area beneath the jagged black curve.

According to Happer, this is only 70% of what it would be without greenhouse gases, which is shown as the smooth blue curve, because as the sun heats the earth, greenhouse gases — mostly water vapor — impede cooling.

The most important part of this graph is the red jagged line, shown here with a red arrow pointing to it. That red line shows the effect that a doubling (a 100% increase) of CO2 would have on the surface temperature of Earth. As you can see, it’s negligible. It decreases radiation into space by just 1.1%.

earths surface temperature graph

As noted by Happer:

“Let that sink in. We’re far from doubling [CO2] today. It’ll take a long time, [and] it only causes a 1% change. So, CO2 is a very poor greenhouse gas. It’s not an efficient greenhouse gas.”

If you remove ALL CO2, you end up with the green jagged curve. As you can see, the green and black jagged lines run parallel with the exception of one spot. There’s a huge effect if you go from zero CO2 to 400 ppm (green arrow). But it’s again negligible when you go from 400 ppm to 800 ppm (black arrow). As explained by Happer:

“You get all of the effect in the first little bit of added CO2 … So, it’s really true that doubling CO2 only causes a 1% decrease of radiation. The IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] gets the same answer so this is not really controversial, although they will never show you the curve or tell you that it’s 1%. That would interfere with the narrative …

So, this is radiation to space. How do you change that into a temperature? They’re worried that we’ll get intolerable warming of the surface of the Earth where we live, or other parts of the atmosphere.

Here again it’s important to do the first order calculation … and it says that the warming from doubling CO2 is … less than one degree … 0.7 [degree] C. Very small. You really can’t feel that.”

Why, Then, the Alarm Over Rising CO2?

Needless to say, this is a huge problem for the climate science community, because a 0.7 degree C difference means there’s no climate emergency, and no matter what we do to reduce CO2 emissions, it’s not going to impact the climate.

So, to fabricate an emergency where there really is none, the IPCC “assumes enormous positive feedbacks,” Happer says. Because CO2 is not a potent greenhouse gas, the tiny direct warming caused by it is amplified by factors of anywhere from four to six to make it seem like it has a discernible impact.

“I like to say it’s affirmative action for CO2,” Happer says. “It’s not very good at warming but if you assume lots of feedback, you can keep the money coming in.” The problem with that is that most who have a background in physical chemistry and physics know that most natural feedbacks are negative, not positive.

“The 0.7 degree C of warming you get when you double the CO2 is probably an overestimate, because there are probably negative feedbacks operating in this very complicated climate system that we live in.” ~ William Happer, Ph.D.

This is known as the Chatelier Principle, named after the French chemist who first discovered that “when a simple system in thermodynamic equilibrium is subjected to a change in concentration, temperature, volume or pressure … the system changes to a new equilibrium and … the change partly counteracts the applied change.”

So, the 0.7 degree C of warming you get when you double the CO2 is “probably an overestimate,” Happer says, “because there are probably negative feedbacks operating in this very complicated climate system that we live in. The atmosphere, the oceans, everything is nonlinear.”

The key take-home from all this is that whether we’re at 400 ppm of CO2 or 800 ppm doesn’t matter when it comes to impacting the temperature of the earth. In short, the climate hysteria is just that. It’s not based on any real threat. Only if we were able to get to absolute zero CO2 would there be a change, but doing so also means we’d exterminate all living things on the planet. It’s nothing short of a suicide agenda.

More CO2 Will Green the Planet

As explained by Happer, more CO2 will green the planet, making it more hospitable to plant life. The more CO2 there is, the better plants and trees grow, so if we want lush forests and bountiful harvests, cutting CO2 is the last thing we’d want to do.

“All plants grow better with more CO2 [in the air],” he says. “Plants are really starved [of] CO2 today. We know plants need many essential nutrients. They need nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium; most important of all they need water. But they also need CO2, and like many of the other nutrients, CO2 today is in short supply.”

CO2 benefits plants by reducing their water needs, hence less risk from drought. Higher CO2 levels also reduce harmful photorespiration. According to Happer, C3-type plants lose about 25% of their photosynthesis potential due to increased photorespiration. For more in-depth information about the role of CO2 in plant growth and photosynthesis, please view the video. This discussion begins around the 40-minute mark.

Lies, Ignorance, Stupidity or Something Else?

In closing, Happer makes an effort to explain what’s driving the climate hysteria:

“In spite of incontrovertible arguments that there is no climate emergency — CO2 is good for the Earth — the campaign to banish CO2, ‘net zero,’ has been very successful. So, how can that be? I’m really out of my depth here because now I’m talking about human nature. I’m really good with instruments and with solving differential equations but I’m not very good at understanding human beings.

But here are some of the drivers: noble lies, political lies, ignorance, stupidity, greed. Noble lies goes back to Plato who discusses it in ‘The Republic.’ ‘In politics, a noble lie is a myth or untruth, often, but not invariably of a religious nature, knowingly propagated by an elite to maintain social harmony or to advance an agenda.’

And here there’s a clear agenda. If you could somehow unite mankind to fight some external threat, for example CO2 pollution, then we won’t fight each other. There won’t be wars. So, I think many sincere people have latched on to the CO2 narrative partly for that reason. You can actually read about it in the early writings of the Club of Rome.

Then there are political lies. This is one my favorite H.L. Menken quotes: ‘The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.’”

Ignorance, of course, is widespread, and largely based on incomplete knowledge or a flawed understanding of the facts. And what of stupidity? Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the few German clergymen who opposed Hitler and eventually paid for his public dissent with his life, once wrote about human stupidity:

“Against stupidity we have no defense. Neither protest nor force can touch it. Reasoning is of no use. Facts that contradict personal prejudices can simply be disbelieved — indeed, the fool can counter by criticizing them, and if they are undeniable, they can just be pushed aside as trivial exceptions.

So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied. In fact, they can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make them aggressive. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one.”

Happer himself has experienced the danger of opposing stupidity. “I regularly get phone calls threatening me, my wife and children with death,” he says. “So, what kind of movement is this?” Lastly, greed. A.S. Pushkin once said, “If there should happen to be a trough, there will be pigs.” And climate science is currently where the big bucks are — provided your work furthers the global warming narrative and the need for net zero emissions.

Whatever the drivers are, responsible people everywhere need to push back against the false climate change narrative and the net zero agenda, as it will accomplish nothing in terms of normalizing temperatures, but will rapidly erode quality of life and the sustainability of food production, and shift wealth into the hands of the few.

Use of food for compliance/control. Suggestion’s that it is the result of overpopulation and climate change.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5jSi-0vmH8

“This Is WHAT They Are TRYING To Hide From YOU” – Whitney Webb 2024 Prediction

Share

57,664 views 10 Feb 2024
In this eye-opening video, Whitney Webb delves into the unsettling future of the global economy, underscored by the potential for economic turmoil triggered by cyber-attacks or other crises. Webb sheds light on the controversial World Coin model for humanitarian aid, which leverages biometric identification for ration distribution, echoing the flaws and dangers seen in India’s Aadhaar system. As geopolitical tensions simmer, Webb reveals a unified push towards digital IDs, CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies), and a surveilled economy across global powers, despite surface-level divisions. From the financial technologies bridging CBDC models to the strategic maneuvers of cryptocurrency giants aiming to align with regulatory frameworks, this video explores the underlying agendas aimed at consolidating control and surveillance. Join us on Unscripted Crypto as we uncover the concealed mechanisms that could shape our digital future and what they mean for personal freedom and privacy.

👉 FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER
This channel is intended to share tips and investment videos by experts. We DO NOT GIVE FINANCIAL ADVICE! Please consult a licensed financial advisor and do your own research before making any financial action.

Never buy crypto just because you see a YouTuber talking about it. Always do your own independent research before investing in any coin.
love stay safe everyone

Something crazy is obviously going to happen with the economy whether it’s provoked by a Cyber attack or whatever the way the UN UNICEF world food program has set up all of their stuff for humanitarian Aid is the world coin model, which is scan your eyeball and we give you a digital ID and that tells us whether or not you eat or not.

You know if you want to get your rations you have to go to the wherever the rations are and have your eyeball scanned and if there’s a mistake in the system and it decides you’re not you no food for you and this has happened in India’s digital ID system Adar to like a significant degree and they haven’t fixed it and they don’t do anything about it and they Justified it by saying that like people’s data will be safer and more secure it’s the most easily hackable thing in the world.

There was like a a big big- time like Indian CEO guy that was like I’m publicly gonna like put up my ad horror ID number and like look how safe it is and it was like hacked in like 10 minutes and people like trolled the crud out of him you know I mean it’s a joke um but they need to manufacture consent for all of this stuff and the way they’re going to do that as fear and panic there’s obviously going to be some
sort of National Security crisis.

They have to create to bring in that fear and panic but they’re creating the base issues on purpose I mean it’s an intentional decision to have the Border in that state and it’s not just happening in the US it’s like a broader thing just like digital ID.

It is like a global thing today we’re diving deep into the insights of Whitney web discussing the intricate dance of Economics technology and control in our modern era as we stand on the precipice of a year filled with uncertainties web warns of potential economic turmoil possibly provoked by cyber attacks or other crises the introduction of a world coin model for humanitarian Aid mandating biometric IDs for food rations is a stark reminder of the digital ID systems flaws as seen in India’s odar program.

This system not only compromises data security but also threatens personal freedom highlighting the global push for digital IDs and programmable money under the guise of security and convenience.

Remember if you find this content insightful don’t forget to hit the like button subscribe to our Channel and ring the bell for notifications on our latest uploads let’s prepare to navigate through these turbulent Waters together.

Talking about the geopolitical stuff you know the Divide here of you know bricks versus the West specifically like us UK Israel Europe the EU um they all agree on digital ID so like yeah there’s this geopolitical tension stuff at one level but go another level up they all agree about some sort of surveill programmable money maybe in the US it’s synthetic dbd.

cbdcs in China and the bricks countries it’s direct issue cbdc they all agree about digital IDs that are biometric they all agree on agenda 2030 and the sustainable development goals yeah and what’s interesting about that well to take it back to the article in fluent Finance the United Arab Emirates what are they setting up financially what is fluent Finance after Farmington gets shut down specifically doing in the United Arab Emirates they’re the connective tissue between the cbdcs direct issue cbdcs of brics land and the synthetic cbdcs of the West and the deposit tokens that’s what they’re setting up that’s what Finance is doing.

In the UAE right now uh with R3 that’s partnered with the dtcc for the Securities stuff and doing the Central Bank digital currency for the UAE uh and a host of other countries that are interoperable with a lot of other ones.

Specifically being overseen by the bis these mcbd projects for like multi-b cbdc projects about interoperability uh the goal is to have you know Corda the R3 DLT right have that as much run on that as possible but what doesn’t run on that will be interoperable with that so interoperability is like a key thing to watch out for and a lot of these companies like like fluent Finance for example are developing this stuff and like no one has noticed which I I think is kind of interesting like a lot of people that are so focused on cbdcs and they’re a threat to human freedom and all of this are just pointing the finger at like bricks and not paying attention to any of these other countries really.

They’re just like bis bad but like yeah um you know Wall Street has plans for this too and like they’re not good either like Jamie Diamond and Jerome pal are not coming to the rescue guys they’re creating the same system under a different name Jamie Diamond programming my dollars to expire.

Tying it to my carbon credits or whatever is not any better than Jerome Powell or uh I don’t know Janet Yellen doing it I mean it’s all the same garbage.

You know what I think is interesting too to take this back to FTX too you know in light of their team up with fluent finance and what fluent Finance has gone on to do I really am curious and I I don’t really know if there’s any way to know now but you know all those donations and cozying up to like you know Elizabeth Warren and all these other like lawmakers by FTX Executives or Ryan Salam cozying up with the Republicans and stuff like was this to uh have them favor the stable coin.

FTX was going to team up with which she seems to have been fluent finances us plus like to favor them as like you know the stable coin issuer of choice for the synthetic cbdc pretty interesting uh possibility there because a lot of it thought it was just like oh crypto reg you know regulation to favor FTX and S SPF and stuff.

But I think there’s a lot of bigger plays that have been going on here for some time and I think people
ignoring these kind of actors we’re doing ourselves a disservice. If you look at the people who created fluent Finance the main guy Bradley Algood used to work for like NATO and like Military Intelligence stuff and then immediately starts making special economic zones out of a building on this Indian reservation in South Carolina.

To like replace Delaware as a place where like companies register to like get tax advantages and stuff and that I mean and then goes on to team up with uh this guy Oliver Gail who is a failed reggae artist uh who claim s to be the in inventor of cbdcs and the other guy was with him in that first cbdc project in Barbados so the inventors of cbdc team up with like NATO spook guy uh to create the S SPF stable coin that’s what was going on before FTX uh collapsed and so yeah maybe SBF is like out of the picture and whatever but this isn’t going away like fluent Finance okay.

Yeah we can’t do the thing with Moonstone and with chalpin and Deltech and FTX but we can do it with R3 which was partnered with you know fluent Finance like pretty much from the very beginning because R3 started off as a Consortium of like some of the biggest banks in the world and their backers are still the biggest banks in the world and there’s a lot of overlap between how fluent Finance started and those same banks that back R3 specifically City Bank uh HSBC and Barclays which uh if you know the history of any of those Banks not good and then you have Bradley all good this the fluent Finance guy like publishing op-eds and and coin Telegraph and stuff being like cbdcs would be great if they put Wall Street in charge.

Literally what it says I mean it’s just they’re telling you but no one’s paying attention because they’re
like oh well look these fed chairs are saying we’re not going to do a digital dollar and that means freedom wins in the good old USA.

No what happens in the USA is is that uh Wall Street steals from everyone and funnels the money to the oligarch class and leaves everyone dirt poor that’s what they’re going to do as we delve deeper into the narrative the geopolitical chessboard reveals its pieces with major Global Powers seemingly divided yet United in their agenda for digital IDs and programmable money despite superficial tensions there is a unanimous push towards a digital surveilled economy underpinned by cbdcs and biometric IDs this convergence on digital control mechanisms transcends borders aligning closely with agenda 2030 and sustainable development goals.

The intricate web of financial technology as seen through initiatives like fluent Finance in the UAE serves as
a bridge between different models of cbdcs ensuring interoperability and control at a global scale however this
digital convergence is not without its critics as many fear the loss of freedom and privacy in the face of omnipresent surveillance and control it’s crucial to remain Vigilant and informed about these developments as the implications for personal freedom and Global sovereignty are profound.

I think tether’s recent overtures to like you know onboarding the Secret Service and the FBI and all
of this stuff freezing all of these Wallets on behalf of the US government this is them trying to Curry favor so they don’t get totally nuked by regulations and they can be like a de facto synthetic cbdc and I’m sure usdc is looking to do the same you know and that’s why I I mentioned earlier like what were these SP SPF political donations potentially really about to be like who you know.

The people that develop the regulations and and enforce them are going to be the king makers of like which stable coins are the de facto cbdc or cbdcs right and uh you know I think that’s something to to look for here I mean which one is it going to be I mean like like um Mark brought up in talking to the the paxos guy saying like he didn’t think like tether and usdc was going to make it past regulation like obviously in my opinion and that’s what s SPF and chalow pine thought because you know F FTX Deltech very tied up with tether for a very long time like very connected so why are they moving from one one dollar Peg stable coin to another well the big difference between tether and US plus is that us plus like overemphasizes regulation and cbdc compatibility and trust and reserves and all of this stuff.

It’s a trusted tether it’s a trustworthy tether right I mean I wouldn’t really say it’s actually trustworthy because it’s working with the same Shady people right so I mean uh but but they want that public perception
to be there and obviously I think the Gambit was to sell that to regulators and be like look this city group backed uh us plus stable coin and whatever uh is compliant and combatible with CBD.

It can be used for trade crossb Finance all over the world and look R3 in the UAE and they’re going to be the bridge between bricks and the Western countries and all this stuff.

I mean I’m sure those conversations have been had behind closed doors you know and then one thing
I think we didn’t mention really quick on why it’s GNA the digital dollar is going to be this and not like a direct issue cbdc like if the if the Fed was going to do a direct issue cbdc they’re really behind like that would take them multiple years to roll out and they need this stuff a lot sooner yeah so as uh CIA Spooks literal CIA veterans focused on this kind of stuff have said in publication in from think tanks like csis is like we have to use the digital dollars that are already here we can’t make a cbdc and what does that mean it means like they’re close to structural insolvency and systemic collapse yeah exactly exactly in the shadow of these advancements the maneuvers of cryptocurrency giants like tether and the political minations of figures like SPF hint at a broader strategy to align closely with regulatory expectations.

Potentially shaping the future of digital currency in the west the push for a synthetic cbdc facilitated by
compliant stable coins underscores a strategic move to integrate digital currencies into the Global Financial system seamlessly however this transition raises significant concerns about trust PR pracy and the concentration of power in the hands of a few as we stand at the crossroads of a digital Revolution.

It’s imperative to critically examine the motives and implications of these developments the future of digital currency and identity May well Define The Contours of Freedom privacy and control in the 21st century.

thank you for joining us on this exploratory Journey Through The Complex landscape of digital economy and control for more insights and analyses make sure to subscribe to unscripted crypto and
stay ahead of the Curve

The final push Push for global collapse.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *